Layering Review Sample Clauses

Layering Review. The Developer acknowledges that a layering review was performed in accordance with 24 CFR 92.250 (b). The Developer hereby represents and certifies to the City that no government assistance other than the City Loans has been obtained or is contemplated to be obtained for the acquisition and rehabilitation of the Property. The Developer agrees to notify the City and Authority in the event that it applies for or proposes to use other governmental funds for the Property prior to the end of the Affordability Period. 504. Limitation Upon Change in Ownership, Management and Control of the Developer.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Layering Review. Participant acknowledges that a layering review has been performed prior to the Date of Agreement and shall be updated and performed in accordance with Federal Program Limitations as a condition to Closing. In connection with such review Participant acknowledges and agrees it shall be required to represent and certify to City that no government assistance other than the loans as provided by City pursuant to this Agreement has been obtained or is contemplated to be obtained for the Construction and operation of the Project on the Site. If and when, such layering review is conducted, Participant agrees to notify City in the event that it applies for or proposes to use governmental funds, other than as listed in the previous sentence, for the Project at the Site.
Sample 1Sample 2
Layering Review. The Owner acknowledges that a layering review was performed in accordance with 24 CFR 92.250 (b). The Owner hereby represents and certifies to the City that no government assistance other than the City Loan has been obtained or is contemplated to be obtained for the acquisition of the Property. The Owner agrees to notify the City in the event that it applies for or proposes to use other governmental funds for the Property prior to the end of the Affordability Period.
Sample 1
Layering Review. Developer acknowledges that a layering review has been performed in accordance with Federal Program Limitations. In connection with such review Developer acknowledges and agrees it shall be required to represent and certify to Authority and Agency that no government assistance other than the Agency Loan, the MHP Loan and Project Based Section 8 assistance, or the AHP Loan has been obtained or is contemplated to be obtained for the Rehabilitation of the Project. If such layering review is conducted, Developer agrees to notify Authority and Agency in the event that it applies for or proposes to use governmental funds, other than as listed in the previous sentence, for the Project or the improvements thereto.
Sample 1
Layering Review. Developer acknowledges that a layering review will be performed in accordance with Federal Program Limitations. In connection with such review Developer acknowledges and agrees it shall be required to represent and certify to Authority that no government assistance other than the HOME Loan, the Tax Credits, the MHSA Loan and/or PBV Assistance, has been obtained or is contemplated to be obtained for the acquisition, Rehabilitation and operation of the Site. If such layering review is conducted, Developer agrees to notify Authority in the event that it applies for or proposes to use governmental funds, other than as listed in the previous sentence, for the Site or the Improvements thereto.
Sample 1
Layering Review. Developer acknowledges that a layering review will be performed in accordance with Federal Program Limitations. In connection with such review Developer acknowledges and agrees it shall be required to represent and certify to Agency that no government assistance other than the Agency Loan and the HUD Grant has been obtained or is contemplated to be obtained for the acquisition and Rehabilitation of the Site. If such layering review is conducted, Developer agrees to notify Agency in the event that it applies for or proposes to use governmental funds, other than as listed in the previous sentence, for the Site or the Improvements thereto. 1304. Compliance with Laws. Developer shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes, ordinances, regulations and laws, (including the Governmental Requirements) with respect to Developer’s ownership and the Rehabilitation and the operation and management of the Site by Developer (all of which comprises the Project hereunder). Developer shall carry out the design, construction and completion of Improvements, and operation and management of the Project, in conformity with all applicable laws, including all applicable federal, state, and local labor standards, City zoning and development standards, building, plumbing, mechanical and electrical codes, and all other provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Government Code Section 4450, et seq., Government Code Section 11135, et seq., and the Xxxxx Act, Civil Code Section 51, et seq.
Sample 1

Related to Layering Review

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Standard of Review The Parties acknowledge and agree that the standard of review for any avoidance, breach, rejection, termination or other cessation of performance of or changes to any portion of this integrated, non-severable Agreement (as described in Section 22) over which FERC has jurisdiction, whether proposed by Seller, by Buyer, by a non-party of, by FERC acting sua sponte shall be the “public interest” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Claims Review Findings a. Narrative Results.‌‌

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.