Likelihood Ratio Test Sample Clauses

Likelihood Ratio Test. ‌ Tests on parameter estimates are performed as usual, with a likelihood ratio test (LRT) comparing the fitted model (alternative model) with the constraint H1 : A ≥ 0 to the null model with the hypothesis H0 : A = 0 (i.e., the model ACE is compared to CE, and AE is compared to E). The LRT statistic, termed as “T”, is defined as T = −2 × [A(ρ0|Y) − A(ρ1|Y)],   where ρ0 and ρ1 are parameter estimates derived from the null model and the  alternative model respectively, and proven to asymptotically follow a chi-squared distribution with 1 degree of freedom, i.e., χ2 (Xxxxx, 1938). However the variance parameter A lies on the boundary of the parameter space of ρ = (A, C, E)T under the null hypothesis H0 : h2 = 0 or, equivalently, H0 : A = 0, and thus the asymp- totic sampling distribution of this LRT statistic, assuming H0 is true, is a mixture of 1 chi-squared distributions . 1 χ2 + 1 χ2Σ instead of a standard chi-square distribution (χ2) (Xxxx and Xxxxx, 1987; Xxxxxxxxx et al., 2006; Xxxxx and Xxx, 2008). Given the asymptotic null distribution of the LRT statistic, the theoretical p-value can be easily calculated. Obtaining a p-value less than a given significance level α, which is typically a small number (e.g., α = 0.05), suggests that there is a significant evidence against the null hypothesis and the null hypothesis should be rejected at level α. The p-value, denoted as p, also indicates there is a 100p% risk of incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis. Aside from the asymptotic theoretical p-value, the permutation-based p-value is exact, based on the empirical distribution of the LRT statistic.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Likelihood Ratio Test

  • PRIORITY RATING If so identified, this Contract is a "rated order" certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use, and SELLER shall follow all the requirements of the Defense Priorities and Allocation System Regulation (15 C.F.R. Part 700).

  • Staff-to-Youth Ratio Requirement For all group activities the AGENCY shall abide by the staff-to-youth ratio range that is between the ratio established by its written policy and procedures and the ratio stated in Section 402.305(4), Florida Statutes. If the staff-to-youth ratio does not meet the minimum standard of care as stated in Section 402.305 (4), Florida Statutes, the AGENCY shall increase staff- to-youth ratios to meet these minimum standards. Section 402.305(4), Florida Statutes, states the minimum staff-to-youth ratio for on-site group activities for children five (5) years of age or older there must be one (1) childcare personnel staff to every twenty-five (25) children; for field trips and other off-site activities, Chapter 65C-22.001, Florida Administrative Code, requires one (1) extra adult, in addition to the on-site requirement. This standard shall be required for all programming paid for with funds under this Contract. The AGENCY will ensure that the staffing pattern is adequate and is adjusted to meet programmatic needs. The AGENCY shall adjust its staffing ratio to meet any ratio update required by Florida Statutes that occurs during the Contract year.

  • Leverage Ratio The Borrower will not permit the Leverage Ratio to exceed 4.50 to 1.0 on the last day of any Fiscal Quarter.

  • Leverage The Fund has no liability for borrowed money or under any reverse repurchase agreement.

  • Evaluation Rating The final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors, observed during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “accomplished”, “skilled”, “developing”, or “ineffective”. The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) domain or component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation rating.

  • Debt Service Coverage Ratio Borrower shall maintain as of the last day of any fiscal quarter a Debt Service Coverage Ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.00 for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters then ended on such day.

  • WORKING TEST PERIOD Section One. The Working Test Period shall be deemed an extension of the examination process. Therefore, a determination of unsatisfactory performance during a Working Test Period shall be tantamount to a failure of the competitive exam.

  • Insurance Carrier Required Rating All insurance companies must carry a rating acceptable to the Office of Risk and Insurance Management. If the Contractor is self-insured for a portion or all of its insurance, review of financial information including a letter of credit may be required.

  • Performance Rating Describes the Educator’s performance on each performance standard and overall. There shall be four performance ratings:  Exemplary: the Educator’s performance consistently and significantly exceeds the requirements of a standard or overall. The rating of exemplary on a standard indicates that practice significantly exceeds proficient and could serve as a model of practice on that standard district-wide.  Proficient: the Educator’s performance fully and consistently meets the requirements of a standard or overall. Proficient practice is understood to be fully satisfactory.

  • Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth ESE will provide model contract language and guidance on rating educator impact on student learning growth based on state and district-determined measures of student learning. Upon receiving this model contract language and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.