Xxxxx and Xxx. Xxxxx X. Levin own in excess of the 10% threshold, they will not be deemed to be an Acquiring Person (as defined below) and their ownership will not trigger a Distribution Date. Similarly, RCG International Investors, LDC ("RCG") beneficially owns in excess of the 10% threshold through the ownership of Common Shares and warrants. Such warrants provide, however, that the stock ownership of RCG and its affiliates may not exceed 9.9% of the outstanding Common Shares. Accordingly, RCG will not be deemed to be an Acquiring Person by virtue of such ownership.
Xxxxx and Xxx xxxx.xx Tag Analysis for Finding the Most Trusted Peer The main goal of Xxxxx et al. [134] is to find out who knows what and who is the most trustworthy in delivering information on a specific subject. To achieve this, topic experience profiles are generated for each peer using ‘Revyu’, ‘xxx.xxxx.xx’, and FOAF descriptions. Previous empirical studies showed that people usually based their trust on the following five factors: expertise, experience, affinity, impartiality, and track record. The different factors were selected based on the criticality of the task and subjectivity of possible solutions. However, the first three were given much more emphasis than the others. Hence, the research of Xxxxx et al. [134] focused on computing the affinity factor when the trust relationship is between two individuals, and the expertise and experience factors when the trust relationship is between an individual and a certain topic. To compute the expertise (or credibility) factor, Revyu tags are inspected. For each tag, all items tagged with that tag are obtained. Then for each item, the mean item rating is obtained and each review of the item is inspected. At the end, each reviewer will have its credibility score updated. To compute the experience (or usage) factor, Revyu tags and user tags on xxx.xxxx.xx are in- spected. The algorithm counts how many times each reviewer has reviewed a tagged item. At the end, each reviewer will have his tag counts (usage scores) updated. Note that both algorithms above have one crucial problem: if the user is the only reviewer then this reviewer will obtain credibility and usage scores of 1, which is a full score representing maximum credibility/usage! Finally, the affinity between two individuals is computed based on the analysis of their reviews in Revyu and some further basic user details from FOAF. The algorithm looks for the items that both reviewers have reviewed. An ‘item overlap ratio’ is obtained by dividing the number of items reviewed by both peers by the highest number of reviews by either peers. Then, the ‘mean rating overlap’ is obtained by taking into consideration the average rating distance of both reviewers (the difference in their ratings of each common item they have reviewed). However, how the item overlap ratio is combined with the mean rating distance to obtain the affinity factor has no clear answer yet, although two possible options are provided.
Xxxxx and Xxx. X. Xxxxx, at sixty days from the date of delivery of cars in lots as above at Toledo. “In case of paper being given, interest is to be allowed at the rate of six per cent. per annum. “THE PENINSULAR CAR WORKS OF DETROIT. “By XXXXX X. XXXXXX, Vice Pres't and Man. “THE OHIO CENTRAL RAILROAD Co., “By XXX. X. XXXXX, President. “X. X. MCGOURKEY, Trustee. “OHIO CENTRAL CAR TRUST, SERIES B., “By X. X. XXXXX. “Cleveland, Nov. 25, 1881.” The “Xxx. X. Xxxxx” who signed said agreement for and in behalf of the Ohio Central Railroad Company is and was the same individual as “X. X. Xxxxx,” who executed it for the Ohio Central Car Trust Association, which was purely an ideal and imaginary con- cern so far as Lease B, No. 2, now under consideration, was concerned. That car trust under which these cars are now claimed was not then formed, and in respect to that there was no such Ohio Central Car Trust Association as that for which the said Xxxxx under- took to agree with himself as president of the railroad company. This singular transaction occurring in advance of the execution of Lease B, No. 2, which formed, if formed at all, the car trust association, whose trustee now claims said cars under that lease, is open to much comment and unfavorable criticism. It presents itself in the questionable form of a preparation in advance to deal with property for which the company had contracted, and which was then being furnished it in some illegitimate or irregular way. Except 200 of said cars received in March, 1882, the entire number were received by the railroad company on and prior to February 9, 1882. How and by whom were they paid for? This does not clearly appear. Notes to the amount of $489,500 were given the car company for the cars as each 100 were received by the railroad company. Said notes, except one for $44,500, given March 10, 1882, at 63 days, all bore date, and many of them matured prior to, March 1, 1882. They were in the following form: “$44,967.25. TOLEDO, O., Dec. 6, 1881.
Xxxxx and Xxx. X. Xxxxx, forty-four thousand nine hundred and sixty-seven 25-100 dollars at the Metropolitan National Bank, New York. ”Value received. Certified Feb. 7, 1882. “METROPOLITAN NATIONAL BANK. “Ohio Central Railroad Car Trust Ass. “By X. X. XXXXXX, Agent. “No.———Due——”
Xxxxx and Xxx. XXXXXX XXXXX of Xxxxxxxx 0, 00000 Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx (each a “Seller”and together the “Sellers”); and
Xxxxx and Xxx prepare a random sequence (KAandKB) of length ‘m’ for key Negotiation and ‘n’ for key authentication where n = m/2. KA = {K1 , K2 , K3 , K4 , Km+n)
Xxxxx and Xxx. Xxxxxxx are the only ones authorized to approve this request. Homecoming is a formal function and proper attire will be required in order to enter and remain: ● Bu1on up shirt with dress pants or dress. ● Dress shoes only (NO Tennis shoes/sneakers). ● No hats of any kind. ● Attire must not be revealing, too tight, or too short, and must be worn as it was designed. ● Items worn under see-through clothing must meet FHS dress code requirements. ***The Principal and her designees have the responsibility and authority to make the final determination as to the appropriate dress of any student. Any student not dressed appropriately will not be allowed entrance into the homecoming and no refund will be issued. All OCPS students remain under OCPS jurisdiction during all official Freedom High School Homecoming activities. The OCPS Student Code of Conduct will be strictly enforced by Freedom High School in response to any OCPS student violations. ONCE A STUDENT EXITS THE HOMECOMING AREA, RE-ENTRY IS NOT PERMITTED!
