Main Results – Finite Dimensions Sample Clauses

Main Results – Finite Dimensions. L  Consider the quantum degraded broadcast channel A→BE1E2 with layered secrecy. We obtain a regularized formula for the capacity region in this setting. Define RLS(L) = [ A (R0, R1, R2) : R0 ≤ I(X0; E2)ρ R1 ≤ [I(X1; E1|X0)ρ − I(X1; E2|X0)ρ]+  , (83) pX ,X ,X , ϕx0,x1,x2  R2 ≤ [I(X2; B|X0, X1)ρ − I(X2; E1E2|X0, X1)ρ]+  x0,x ,x1 2 where the union is over the distribution of the auxiliary random variables X0, X1, X2 and the collections of quantum states {ϕA }, with 2 0 1 2 2 A ρX X X BE E = Σ pX ,X ,X (x0, x1, x2)LA→BE E (ϕx0,x1,x2 ) . (84) x0,x1,x2 L Theorem 9. The layered-secrecy capacity region of the quantum degraded broadcast channel A→BE1E2 in finite dimensions is given by [ ∞ CLS(L) = n=1 1 RLS(L⊗n) . (85) n The proof of Theorem 9 is given in Appendix D. Remark 14. Given a classical degraded broadcast channel WY Z1Z2|X , the bound on the top-secret rate R2 in (83) can be simplified. In particular, we can choose X2 to be the channel input, i.e., X2 = X. Furthermore, the auxiliary random variables can be chosen such that X0 X1 X Y Z1 Z2 form a Markov chain, given a physically degraded broadcast channel. That is, the joint distribution of those variables can be expressed as pX0X1XY Z1Z2 (x0, x1, x, y, z1, z2) = pX0 (x0)pX1|X0 (x1|x0)pX|X1 (x|x1)WY |X (y|x)D1(z1|y)D2(z2|z1) , (86) for some input distributions pX0 , pX1|X0 , and pX|X1 , and degrading channels Dj, for j = 1, 2. In this case, we have
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Main Results – Finite Dimensions

  • Use of Areas of Operations PURCHASER shall confine equipment, storage of materials and operation to the limits indicated by contract, law, ordinances, permits or directions of the STATE's Authorized Representative. PURCHASER shall follow the STATE's Authorized Representative's instructions regarding use of the areas of operations, if any. In addition, PURCHASER shall be responsible for regular cleaning in compliance with all federal, state, and local laws rules and ordinances. Protection of Workers, Property, and Public. The PURCHASER is responsible to manage the operations to mitigate impacts to the operations, including authorized changes, which may adversely affect cost, schedule, or quality. The PURCHASER is responsible for the actions of all personnel, laborers, suppliers, and subcontractors in the performance of the operations. PURCHASER shall maintain continuous and adequate protection of all of the Work from damage, and shall protect the STATE's workers and property from injury or loss arising in connection with this contract. PURCHASER shall remedy to the STATE's satisfaction, any damage, injury, or loss, except such as may be directly due to errors in the contract or caused by authorized representatives or personnel of the STATE. PURCHASER shall adequately protect adjacent property as provided by law and the contract. PURCHASER shall take all necessary precautions for the safety of all personnel on the areas of operations, and shall comply with the contract and all applicable provisions of federal, state, and municipal safety laws to prevent accidents or injury to persons on, about or adjacent to the areas of operations. PURCHASER shall erect and properly maintain at all times, as required by the conditions and progress of the operations, all necessary safeguards for protection of workers and the public against any hazards created by the operations. PURCHASER shall designate a responsible employee or associate on the areas of operations, whose duty shall be the prevention of accidents. The name and position of the person designated shall be reported to the STATE's Authorized Representative. The STATE's Authorized Representative has no responsibility for safety on areas of operations. Safety on areas of operations is the responsibility of the PURCHASER. In an emergency affecting the safety of life or of the operation or of adjoining property, the PURCHASER, without special instruction or authorization from the STATE's Authorized Representative, shall act reasonably to prevent threatened loss or injury, and shall so act, without appeal, if instructed by the STATE's Authorized Representative. Any compensation claimed by the PURCHASER on account of emergency work shall be equitably determined.

  • - OWNERSHIP/USE OF THE RESULTS II.3.1 Unless stipulated otherwise in this agreement, ownership of the results of the action, including industrial and intellectual property rights, and of the reports and other documents relating to it shall be vested in the beneficiary.

  • BID TABULATION AND RESULTS Bid tabulations shall be available thirty (30) days after opening on the Orange County website at: xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xxx/orangebids/bidresults/results.asp or upon notice of intended action, whichever is sooner.

  • ADVERTISING RESULTS The prior written approval of the Commissioner is required in order for results of the Bid to be used by the Contractor as part of any commercial advertising. The Contractor shall also obtain the prior written approval of the Commissioner relative to the Bid or Contract for press or other media releases.

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • ROAD DIMENSIONS Purchaser shall perform road work in accordance with the dimensions shown on the TYPICAL SECTION SHEET and the specifications within this road plan.

  • Expected Results VA’s agreement with DoD to provide educational assistance is a statutory requirement of Chapter 1606, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 1607, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 30, Title 38, U.S.C. and Chapter 33, Title 38, U.S.C (Post-9/11 GI Xxxx). These laws require VA to make payments to eligible veterans, service members, guard, reservist, and family members under the transfer of entitlement provisions. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 1606 is placed on the DoD. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on VA, while the responsibility of providing initial eligibility data for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on DoD. Thus, the two agencies must exchange data to ensure that VA makes payments only to those who are eligible for a program. Without an exchange of enrollment and eligibility data, VA would not be able to establish or verify applicant and recipient eligibility for the programs. Subject to the due process requirements, set forth in Article VII.B.1., 38 U.S.C. §3684A, VA may suspend, terminate, or make a final denial of any financial assistance on the basis of data produced by a computer matching program with DoD. To minimize administrative costs of implementation of the law and to maximize the service to the veteran or service member, a system of data exchanges and subsequent computer matching programs was developed. The purposes of the computer matching programs are to minimize the costs of administering the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; facilitate accurate payment to eligible veterans or service members training under the Chapter of the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; and to avoid payment to those who lose eligibility. The current automated systems, both at VA and DoD, have been developed over the last twenty-two years. The systems were specifically designed to utilize computer matching in transferring enrollment and eligibility data to facilitate accurate payments and avoid incorrect payments. The source agency, DMDC, stores eligibility data on its computer based system of record. The cost of providing this data to VA electronically are minimal when compared to the cost DMDC would incur if the data were forwarded to VA in a hard-copy manner. By comparing records electronically, VA avoids the personnel costs of inputting data manually as well as the storage costs of the DMDC documents. This results in a VA estimated annual savings of $26,724,091 to VA in mailing and data entry costs. DoD reported an estimated annual savings of $12,350,000. A cost-benefit analysis is at Attachment 1. In the 32 years since the inception of the Chapter 30 program, the cost savings of using computer matching to administer the benefit payments for these educational assistance programs have remained significant. The implementation of Chapter 33 has impacted the Chapter 30 program over the past 8 years (fiscal year 2010 through fiscal year 2017). Statistics show a decrease of 23 percent in the number of persons who ultimately use Chapter 30 from fiscal year 2015 to 2016. The number of persons who use Chapter 33 has consistently been above 700,000 in the past four years. VA foresees continued cost savings due to the number of persons eligible for the education programs.‌

  • – OWNERSHIP OF THE RESULTS - INTELLECTUAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY Any results or rights thereon, including copyright and other intellectual or industrial property rights, obtained in performance of the Contract, shall be owned solely by the Agency, which may use, publish, assign or transfer them as it sees fit, without geographical or other limitation, except where industrial or intellectual property rights exist prior to the Contract being entered into.

  • Dissemination of own Results 8.3.1.1 During the Project and for a period of 1 year after the end of the Project, the dissemination of own Results by one or several Parties including but not restricted to publications and presentations, shall be governed by the procedure of Article 29.1 of the Grant Agreement subject to the following provisions. Prior notice of any planned publication shall be given to the other Parties at least 45 calendar days before the publication. Any objection to the planned publication shall be made in accordance with the Grant Agreement in writing to the Coordinator and to the Party or Parties proposing the dissemination within 30 calendar days after receipt of the notice. If no objection is made within the time limit stated above, the publication is permitted.

  • SERVICE MONITORING, ANALYSES AND ORACLE SOFTWARE 11.1 We continuously monitor the Services to facilitate Oracle’s operation of the Services; to help resolve Your service requests; to detect and address threats to the functionality, security, integrity, and availability of the Services as well as any content, data, or applications in the Services; and to detect and address illegal acts or violations of the Acceptable Use Policy. Oracle monitoring tools do not collect or store any of Your Content residing in the Services, except as needed for such purposes. Oracle does not monitor, and does not address issues with, non-Oracle software provided by You or any of Your Users that is stored in, or run on or through, the Services. Information collected by Oracle monitoring tools (excluding Your Content) may also be used to assist in managing Oracle’s product and service portfolio, to help Oracle address deficiencies in its product and service offerings, and for license management purposes.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.