Master Thesis selection Sample Clauses

Master Thesis selection. The Master Thesis is undertaken preferably with an Associated Industrial/Academic Partners or Supporting Partner. The Consortium publish in October of Year 2 a list of Master Thesis proposals on the Programme intranet for Student’s perusal. However, a Student may submit a Master Thesis topic with another institution or industry. This topic must be submitted by the end of September of year 2 so it can be evaluated and validated by the Academic Coordinator. The topic and the institution/industry must be validated by the Academic Coordinator before it becomes a valid Master Thesis. Master Thesis must materialize into a work placement of six (6) months. The Master thesis should be according to the international standards of Master thesis and the Topic should be related to topics within the expertise of the programme. The Master Thesis proposals are validated for every intake by the Academic and Management Board. Advanced colour and image processing 5 ECTS Human Perception and Cognition 5 ECTS Optional courses Extra ECTS granted Spanish language and culture 5 ECTS Semester 2 Hosting Institution Associated Industrial Partners (or) Associated industrial Partners or Supporting Partners Learning rationale Professionalization Summer internship = No ECTS Semester 3 Hosting Institution University of Eastern Finland Learning rationale Specialization in Computational Spectral Imaging Core Teaching Modules = 30 ECTS Compulsory courses = 25 ECTS Application on photonics 5 ECTS Advanced spectral imaging devices 5 ECTS Colour science laboratory 5 ECTS Industrial group project 5 ECTS Advanced deep learning 5 ECTS Elective units = 5 ECTS Optical metrology and fabrication 5 ECTS Location-aware mobile applications development 5 ECTS Other elective course upon eligibility 5 ECTS Optional courses Extra ECTS granted Finnish language and culture 2 ECTS Semester 3 Hosting Institution Norwegian University of Science and Technology Learning rationale Specialization in Colour and Visual Computing Core Teaching Modules = 30 ECTS Compulsory courses = 22.5 ECTS Specialisation in colour imaging 7.5 ECTS Specialisation in video processing 7.5 ECTS Appearance, perception and measurement 7.5 5 ECTS Elective units Extra ECTS, 7.5 ECTS at least. Students must take 2 courses at least Advanced Colour Management 7.5 ECTS Advanced project work 7.5 ECTS Other elective course upon eligibility 7.5 ECTS Semester 4 Hosting Institution Associated Industrial Partners (or) Associated industrial Partners or...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Master Thesis selection. The Master Thesis is undertaken preferably with an Associated Industrial/Academic Partners or Supporting Partner. The list of Advanced project work 7.5 ECTS Master Thesis proposals are provided to the students by the end of Other elective course upon eligibility
Sample 1

Related to Master Thesis selection

  • Shift Selection In multiple shift operations, employees within each classification shall have a right to select their work shift on the basis of their seniority within a bureau or division thereof and competing only with employees covered under this agreement on the following basis:

  • Panel Selection 1. The Parties shall apply the following procedures in selecting a Panel: (a) the Panel shall comprise 3 members; (b) within 15 days following the date of the establishment of the Panel, each Party shall nominate a Panelist; (c) the Parties shall endeavor

  • Single Source Selection Services for tasks in circumstances which meet the requirements of paragraph 3.10 of the Consultant Guidelines for Single Source Selection, may, with the Association's prior agreement, be procured in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.9 through 3.13 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • ODUF Pack Rejection 6.4.1 Image Access will notify BellSouth within one (1) business day of rejected packs (via the mutually agreed medium). Packs could be rejected because of pack sequencing discrepancies or a critical edit failure on the Pack Header or Pack Trailer records (e.g., out-of-balance condition on grand totals, invalid data populated). Standard ATIS EMI error codes will be used. Image Access will not be required to return the actual rejected data to BellSouth. Rejected packs will be corrected and retransmitted to Image Access by BellSouth.

  • Textbook Selection Textbook committees composed of teachers, principals, and the assistant superintendent shall review textbooks and shall make recommendations to the administrative team for consideration. Final selection shall be left to the Board of Education or its authorized representatives.

  • Desirable Selection Criteria 1. Possession of, or significant progression toward the attainment of a post graduate qualification in area of specialty.

  • Direct Trunked Transport 7.3.2.1 Either Party may elect to purchase direct trunked transport from the other Party.

  • Treatment Program Testing The Employer may request or require an employee to undergo drug and alcohol testing if the employee has been referred by the employer for chemical dependency treatment or evaluation or is participating in a chemical dependency treatment program under an employee benefit plan, in which case the employee may be requested or required to undergo drug or alcohol testing without prior notice during the evaluation or treatment period and for a period of up to two years following completion of any prescribed chemical dependency treatment program.

  • Provider Selection To the extent applicable to Provider in performance of the Agreement, Provider shall comply with 42 CFR 438.214, as may be amended from time to time, which includes, but is not limited to the selection and retention of providers, credentialing and recredentialing requirements and nondiscrimination. If Subcontractor and/or Health Plan delegate credentialing to Provider, Subcontractor and/or Health Plan will provide monitoring and oversight and Provider shall ensure that all licensed medical professionals are credentialed in accordance with Health Plan’s and the State Contract’s credentialing requirements.

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.