New NER Results Sample Clauses

New NER Results. We have used these entities as new training data, using the same CRF model as mentioned in the introduction (Brandsen, 2018), and have seen a large increase in the overall micro F1 score, from 0.51 to 0.70, showing that this data is of better quality than the previously used training data. The difference between this, and the F1 between five human annotators (0.95) indicates that there is also still room for improvement. In Table 3.5 we show the difference in F1 score per entity type. Most types see a substantial increase, especially Locations, while the Material category sees Old New Difference Artefact 0.51 0.63 +0.12 Time Period 0.57 0.69 +0.12 Location 0.26 0.66 +0.40 Context 0.58 0.84 +0.26 Material 0.54 0.39 -0.15 Species n/a 0.49 n/a Overall Micro F1 0.51 0.70 +0.19 Table 3.5: F1 scores for entity types and overall micro F1 compared between the previous and new data set. Species wasn’t included in old data set, so we only present the score for the new data set. 0.75 F1 Entity type Artefact Context Location Material Overall Species Time Period 0.00 8 9 10 Number of chunks used as training data
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to New NER Results

  • - OWNERSHIP/USE OF THE RESULTS II.3.1 Unless stipulated otherwise in this agreement, ownership of the results of the action, including industrial and intellectual property rights, and of the reports and other documents relating to it shall be vested in the beneficiary.

  • Expected Results VA’s agreement with DoD to provide educational assistance is a statutory requirement of Chapter 1606, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 1607, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 30, Title 38, U.S.C. and Chapter 33, Title 38, U.S.C (Post-9/11 GI Xxxx). These laws require VA to make payments to eligible veterans, service members, guard, reservist, and family members under the transfer of entitlement provisions. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 1606 is placed on the DoD. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on VA, while the responsibility of providing initial eligibility data for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on DoD. Thus, the two agencies must exchange data to ensure that VA makes payments only to those who are eligible for a program. Without an exchange of enrollment and eligibility data, VA would not be able to establish or verify applicant and recipient eligibility for the programs. Subject to the due process requirements, set forth in Article VII.B.1., 38 U.S.C. §3684A, VA may suspend, terminate, or make a final denial of any financial assistance on the basis of data produced by a computer matching program with DoD. To minimize administrative costs of implementation of the law and to maximize the service to the veteran or service member, a system of data exchanges and subsequent computer matching programs was developed. The purposes of the computer matching programs are to minimize the costs of administering the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; facilitate accurate payment to eligible veterans or service members training under the Chapter of the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; and to avoid payment to those who lose eligibility. The current automated systems, both at VA and DoD, have been developed over the last twenty-two years. The systems were specifically designed to utilize computer matching in transferring enrollment and eligibility data to facilitate accurate payments and avoid incorrect payments. The source agency, DMDC, stores eligibility data on its computer based system of record. The cost of providing this data to VA electronically are minimal when compared to the cost DMDC would incur if the data were forwarded to VA in a hard-copy manner. By comparing records electronically, VA avoids the personnel costs of inputting data manually as well as the storage costs of the DMDC documents. This results in a VA estimated annual savings of $26,724,091 to VA in mailing and data entry costs. DoD reported an estimated annual savings of $12,350,000. A cost-benefit analysis is at Attachment 1. In the 32 years since the inception of the Chapter 30 program, the cost savings of using computer matching to administer the benefit payments for these educational assistance programs have remained significant. The implementation of Chapter 33 has impacted the Chapter 30 program over the past 8 years (fiscal year 2010 through fiscal year 2017). Statistics show a decrease of 23 percent in the number of persons who ultimately use Chapter 30 from fiscal year 2015 to 2016. The number of persons who use Chapter 33 has consistently been above 700,000 in the past four years. VA foresees continued cost savings due to the number of persons eligible for the education programs.‌

  • Audit Results If an audit by a Party determines that an overpayment or an underpayment has occurred, a notice of such overpayment or underpayment shall be given to the other Party together with those records from the audit which support such determination.

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • POSITION SUMMARY The incumbent provides a variety of heavy cleaning, transporting of furniture/ equipment and other related housekeeping functions in our corporate apartments, to maintain an orderly and sanitary condition. The incumbent must fulfill the requirements of the Criminal Records/Vulnerable Person, Child Abuse Registry Check and Adult Abuse Registry Check, and adhere to all Northern Health Region policies and procedures. QUALIFICATIONS • Grade 12 or equivalent • Must have a valid Manitoba Class V driver’s license and access to a vehicle and willingness to travel the region year around • Certificate for ‘Environmental Services & Infection Control’ Training Course or willingness to obtain • Previous housekeeping experience preferred • Knowledge of Infection Control Procedures as they relate to your duties • Ability to understand and follow verbal and written communication • Demonstrates interpersonal skills through clear communication and positive behavior within the Respectful Workplace Policy • Must be able and capable of lifting and/ or lifting equipment or items as required utilizing proper body mechanics as instructed • Demonstrated ability to work with minimal supervision • Ability to respect and promote a cultural diverse population • Must have a good employment record, including attendance at work • Demonstrated ability to work in a team environment • Satisfactory employment record required • Successful candidate subject to provide security checks in accordance with Security Checks for Employment Policy (HR-02-80. Waived for internal candidates with current checks on file. For a full listing of qualifications please: • Internal Candidates: Refer to the Job Description which is posted on the Intranet under Department/Human Resources/Job Description, then select the applicable department; or, • External Candidates: Contact Human Resources to request a copy Northern RHA strives to have a diverse workforce in an inclusive and accessible workplace, which provides opportunity for reasonable accommodation. Indigenous applicants are encouraged to self-declare when submitting applications & resumes. We thank all candidates for applying. Only those selected for interview will be contacted. Using Google Chrome, Apply online at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx on or before OPEN UNTIL FILLED Note: In the event of technical difficulties with the online application, please contact Human Resources at XXXXxxxxxxx@xxxx.xx for assistance prior to the closing date.

  • BID TABULATION AND RESULTS Bid tabulations shall be available thirty (30) days after opening on the Orange County website at: xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xxx/orangebids/bidresults/results.asp or upon notice of intended action, whichever is sooner.

  • Test Results The employer, upon request from an employee or former employee, will provide the confidential written report issued pursuant to 4.9 of the Canadian Model in respect to that employee or former employee.

  • Narrative Results i. A description of Xxxxxxx’x billing and coding system(s), including the identification, by position description, of the personnel involved in coding and billing.

  • Discussion of Differences If a difference arises between the Employer and an employee(s) or between the Employer and the Union concerning the interpretation, application, operation or any alleged violation of the Agreement, the employee(s) shall continue to work in accordance with the Agreement until the difference is settled.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.