Nomination of new Operators Sample Clauses

Nomination of new Operators. (a) The Access Holder may nominate a new Accredited Operator (who is not currently an approved Operator for any Train Path under this agreement) on 10 Business Days’ written notice to ARTC. The notice must include sufficient information (to be specified on ARTC’s website from time to time) about the Accredited Operator to enable ARTC to consider the nomination. (b) ARTC will use its best endeavours to approve or reject that nomination within 10 Business Days of the later of receiving notice or the required information. ARTC is only entitled to reject a nomination if: (i) the Operator is not accredited at the time of the nomination; (ii) the Accredited Operator does not have an unconditional Operator Sub-Agreement with ARTC endorsed by the Access Holder; (iii) the nominated Operator has received a rectification notice or similar notice from ARTC for Material Default of any agreement with ARTC and the event giving rise to that rectification notice or similar notice has not been rectified; (iv) ARTC forms the view, acting reasonably, that the Accredited Operator is not of sufficient financial capacity to meet potential liabilities under the Operator Sub-Agreement provided that ARTC is only able to form this view if it has requested Credit Support from the Operator and the Operator has not provided the Credit Support within the timeframe provided under the Operator Sub-Agreement.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Nomination of new Operators. (a) The Access Holder may nominate a new Accredited Operator (who is not currently an approved Operator for any Train Path under this agreement) on 10 Business Days’ written notice to ARTC. The notice must include sufficient information (to be specified on ARTC’s website from time to time) about the Accredited Operator to enable ARTC to consider the nomination. (b) ARTC will use its best endeavours to approve or reject that nomination within 10 Business Days of the later of receiving notice or the required information. ARTC is entitled to reject a nomination if: (i) the Accredited Operator does not have an unconditional Operator Sub- Agreement with ARTC endorsed by the Access Holder; (ii) the Accredited Operator is in material default of an Operator Sub- Agreement in relation to another access holder or has had such agreement terminated by ARTC in the past; or (iii) ARTC forms the view, acting reasonably, that the Accredited Operator is not of sufficient financial capacity to meet potential liabilities under the Operator Sub-Agreement.

Related to Nomination of new Operators

  • Substitution of Key Personnel Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: Xxxxx Xxxxx.

  • Certification Regarding Prohibition of Certain Terrorist Organizations (Tex Gov. Code 2270) Certification Regarding Prohibition of Boycotting Israel (Tex. Gov. Code 2271) 5 Certification Regarding Prohibition of Contracts with Certain Foreign-Owned Companies (Tex. Gov. 5 Code 2274) 5 Certification Regarding Prohibition of Discrimination Against Firearm and Ammunition Industries (Tex.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!