Common use of Non-Routine Evaluation Clause in Contracts

Non-Routine Evaluation. a. Teachers who receive a less than satisfactory report in the routine evaluation scheme will have subsequent evaluations in a time period as described in the Collective Agreement. i. When an Officer of the Board believes that the teaching performance of a teacher requires review, the Officer is to meet with the teacher and outline the concerns and reasons for the concerns. Consensus is to be strived for in determining what actions the teacher should take to correct the problem(s) and the time period necessary to implement the corrections. A written summary of the meeting is to be signed by both parties. If no consensus is reached, the Officer is to place their concerns and suggestions in writing and to confirm the substance of the meeting and areas of agreement and disagreement. A copy of this summary will be provided to the teacher. ii. A second meeting is to be held after the timelines set as a result of the first meeting to review the situation. The Officer is to present to the teacher evidence supporting their position that the original concerns have been addressed or are still outstanding. If the outstanding issues are considered to be serious, the Officer is to inform the teacher in writing that they will be conducting a formal evaluation of the teacher, with a copy of this correspondence being filed with the Superintendent of Schools and the President of the PRSTA.

Non-Routine Evaluation. a. Teachers who receive a less than satisfactory report in the routine evaluation scheme will have subsequent evaluations in a time period as described in the Collective Agreement. i. When an Officer of the Board believes that the teaching performance of a teacher requires review, the Officer is to meet with the teacher and outline the concerns and reasons for the concerns. Consensus is to be strived for in determining what actions the teacher should take to correct the problem(s) and the time period necessary to implement the corrections. A written summary of the meeting is to be signed by both parties. If no consensus is reached, the Officer is to place their his/her concerns and suggestions in writing and to confirm the substance of the meeting and areas of agreement and disagreement. A copy of this summary will be provided to the teacher. ii. A second meeting is to be held after the timelines set as a result of the first meeting to review the situation. The Officer is to present to the teacher evidence supporting their his/her position that the original concerns have been addressed or are still outstanding. If the outstanding issues are considered to be serious, the Officer is to inform the teacher in writing that they he/she will be conducting a formal evaluation of the teacher, with a copy of this correspondence being filed with the Superintendent of Schools and the President of the PRSTA.