Objectives for work package 1 – Policy Sample Clauses

Objectives for work package 1 – Policy impact and sustainability Governments across Europe have committed substantial funds to scientific grid computing, both through national projects and European initiatives. Scientists are reaping the benefits of this forward-looking investment, as there is an extensive production infrastructure in place, which is relied on by tens of thousands of researchers in many disciplines to produce results, including life sciences, social sciences, astronomy and high energy physics – work that is now being published in prestigious journals such as Nature2. However, this message needs to be reinforced with policy makers who influence the political decision-making process for science at the national and European levels. GridBriefings While projects such as Grid Computing Now! in the UK produced case studies and briefings aimed at UK businesses, there is still a need for reporting at a European and international level that is targeted at policy makers in science and business. In the past, this has represented a substantial gap in grid dissemination, and significant inroads have been made into this area by the GridTalk project’s series of GridBriefings. These short, full-colour policy articles illustrate the scientific results and impacts arising from grid computing, interpreting EC policy documents and reports in an accessible and attractive format. To date, GridBriefings have covered standardisation, the European Grid Initiative Design Study, grids and clouds and women in ICT among other topics and have been distributed to all contributing organisations, the Enabling Grids for E- sciencE dissemination lists and non-European projects including OSG, ThaiGrid and the E-science grid facility for Europe and Latin America (EELA-2). The GridBriefings are timed to coincide with relevant events, such as conferences or the launch of reports. In the first year, more than 40 projects contributed to the production of the briefings, including global projects and initiatives such as the Open Grid Forum, the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid, the Green Grid and the fusion project, ITER. The reviewers noted that the project “has made appropriate efforts on issues of importance to the European Commission, such as gender, through eg its GridBriefing on ‘Women in ICT’.” Examples of GridBriefings published during GridTalk With the transition from the EGEE project to EGI and the rise in publicity surrounding cloud computing, it is now more important than ever to keep the achievements supported b...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Objectives for work package 1 – Policy

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Project Specific Milestones In addition to the milestones stated in Section 212.5 of the Tariff, as applicable, during the term of this ISA, Interconnection Customer shall ensure that it meets each of the following development milestones:

  • Program Objectives In performing its responsibilities with respect to the management and administration of the Program, each party shall be guided by the following Program objectives:

  • Performance Schedule The Parties will perform their respective responsibilities in accordance with the Performance Schedule. By executing this Agreement, Customer authorizes Motorola to proceed with contract performance.

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Consultants’ Services 1. Quality- and Cost-based Selection. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 2 below, consultants’ services shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Quality and Cost-based Selection.

  • Work Plan Coordinate a work plan including a list of the proposed meetings and coordination activities, and related tasks to be performed, a schedule and an estimate. The work plan must satisfy the requirements of the project and must be approved by the State prior to commencing work.

  • Alternate Work Schedule An alternate work schedule is any work schedule where an employee is regularly scheduled to work five (5) days per week, but the employee’s regularly scheduled two (2) days off are NOT Saturday and Sunday.

  • Development Schedule The Project shall substantially comply with the specific timetables and triggers for action set forth in Article 5 of this Agreement. The parties acknowledge that, as provided in G.S. 160A-400.25(b), the failure to meet a commencement or completion date shall not, in and of itself, constitute a material breach of this Agreement pursuant to G.S. 160A-400.27 but must be judged based upon the totality of the circumstances.

  • Development Milestones In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7.1, LICENSEE specifically commits to achieving the following development milestones in its diligence activities under this AGREEMENT: (a) (b).

  • Milestones Subject to the provisions of the SGIP, the Parties shall agree on milestones for which each Party is responsible and list them in Attachment 4 of this Agreement. A Party’s obligations under this provision may be extended by agreement. If a Party anticipates that it will be unable to meet a milestone for any reason other than a Force Majeure event, it shall immediately notify the other Parties of the reason(s) for not meeting the milestone and (1) propose the earliest reasonable alternate date by which it can attain this and future milestones, and (2) requesting appropriate amendments to Attachment 4. The Party affected by the failure to meet a milestone shall not unreasonably withhold agreement to such an amendment unless it will suffer significant uncompensated economic or operational harm from the delay, (1) attainment of the same milestone has previously been delayed, or (2) it has reason to believe that the delay in meeting the milestone is intentional or unwarranted notwithstanding the circumstances explained by the Party proposing the amendment.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.