Common use of OIG Removal of IRO Clause in Contracts

OIG Removal of IRO. In the event OIG has reason to believe the IRO does not possess the qualifications described in Paragraph B, is not independent and objective as set forth in Paragraph E, or has failed to carry out its responsibilities as described in Paragraph C, OIG shall notify Dakwa and HEAG in writing regarding OIG’s basis for determining that the IRO has not met the requirements of this Appendix. Dakwa and HEAG shall have 30 days from the date of OIG’s written notice to provide information regarding the IRO’s qualifications, independence or performance of its responsibilities in order to resolve the concerns identified by OIG. If, following OIG’s review of any information provided by Dakwa and HEAG regarding its IRO, OIG determines that the IRO has not met the requirements of this Appendix, OIG shall notify Dakwa and HEAG in writing that Dakwa and HEAG shall be required to engage a new IRO in accordance with Paragraph A of this Appendix. Dakwa and HEAG must engage a new IRO within 60 days of receipt of OIG’s written notice. The final determination as to whether or not to require Dakwa and HEAG to engage a new IRO shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.‌ APPENDIX B QUARTERLY CLAIMS REVIEW‌‌‌

OIG Removal of IRO. In the event OIG has reason to believe the IRO does not possess the qualifications described in Paragraph B, is not independent and objective as set forth in Paragraph E, or has failed to carry out its responsibilities as described in Paragraph C, OIG shall notify Dakwa and HEAG Princeton Pathology in writing regarding OIG’s basis for determining that the IRO has not met the requirements of this Appendix. Dakwa and HEAG Princeton Pathology shall have 30 days from the date of OIG’s written notice to provide information regarding the IRO’s qualifications, independence or performance of its responsibilities in order to resolve the concerns identified by OIG. If, following OIG’s review of any information provided by Dakwa and HEAG Princeton Pathology regarding its the IRO, OIG determines that the IRO has not met the requirements of this Appendix, OIG shall notify Dakwa and HEAG Princeton Pathology in writing that Dakwa and HEAG Princeton Pathology shall be required to engage a new IRO in accordance with Paragraph A of this Appendix. Dakwa and HEAG Princeton Pathology must engage a new IRO within 60 days of its receipt of OIG’s written notice. The final determination as to whether or not to require Dakwa and HEAG Princeton Pathology to engage a new IRO shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.‌ OIG. APPENDIX B QUARTERLY CLAIMS REVIEW‌‌‌REVIEW‌‌

OIG Removal of IRO. In the event OIG has reason to believe the IRO does not possess the qualifications described in Paragraph B, is not independent and objective as set forth in Paragraph E, E or has failed to carry out its responsibilities as described in Paragraph C, OIG shall notify Dakwa and HEAG Mallinckrodt in writing regarding OIG’s basis for determining that the IRO has not met the requirements of this Appendix. Dakwa and HEAG Mallinckrodt shall have 30 days from the date of OIG’s written notice to provide information regarding the IRO’s qualifications, independence or performance of its responsibilities in order to resolve the concerns identified by OIG. If, following OIG’s review of any information provided by Dakwa and HEAG Mallinckrodt regarding its the IRO, OIG determines that the IRO has not met the requirements of this Appendix, OIG shall notify Dakwa and HEAG Mallinckrodt in writing that Dakwa and HEAG Mallinckrodt shall be required to engage a new IRO in accordance with Paragraph A of this Appendix. Dakwa and HEAG Mallinckrodt must engage a new IRO within 60 days of its receipt of OIG’s written notice. The final determination as to whether or not to require Dakwa and HEAG Mallinckrodt to engage a new IRO shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.‌ APPENDIX B QUARTERLY CLAIMS REVIEW‌‌‌OIG. I. Covered Functions Review, General Description

OIG Removal of IRO. In the event OIG has reason to believe the IRO does not possess the qualifications described in Paragraph B, is not independent and objective as set forth in Paragraph E, or has failed to carry out its responsibilities as described in Paragraph C, OIG shall notify Dakwa Dr. Uradu and HEAG UTC in writing regarding OIG’s basis for determining that the IRO has not met the requirements of this Appendix. Dakwa Dr. Uradu and HEAG UTC shall have 30 days from the date of OIG’s written notice to provide information regarding the IRO’s qualifications, independence or performance of its responsibilities in order to resolve the concerns identified by OIG. If, following OIG’s review of any information provided by Dakwa Dr. Uradu and HEAG UTC regarding its IRO, OIG determines that the IRO has not met the requirements of this Appendix, OIG shall notify Dakwa Dr. Uradu and HEAG UTC in writing that Dakwa Dr. Uradu and HEAG UTC shall be required to engage a new IRO in accordance with Paragraph A of this Appendix. Dakwa Dr. Uradu and HEAG UTC must engage a new IRO within 60 days of receipt of OIG’s written notice. The final determination as to whether or not to require Dakwa Dr. Uradu and HEAG UTC to engage a new IRO shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.‌ APPENDIX B QUARTERLY CLAIMS REVIEW‌‌‌REVIEW‌

OIG Removal of IRO. In the event OIG has reason to believe the IRO does not possess the qualifications described in Paragraph B, is not independent and objective as set forth in Paragraph ED, or has failed to carry out its responsibilities as described in Paragraph C, OIG shall notify Dakwa and HEAG Xx. Xxxxxxx in writing regarding OIG’s basis for determining that the IRO has not met the requirements of this Appendix. Dakwa and HEAG Xx. Xxxxxxx shall have 30 days from the date of OIG’s written notice to provide information regarding the IRO’s qualifications, independence or performance of its responsibilities in order to resolve the concerns identified by OIG. If, following OIG’s review of any information provided by Dakwa and HEAG Xx. Xxxxxxx regarding its IRO, OIG determines that the IRO has not met the requirements of this Appendix, OIG shall notify Dakwa and HEAG Xx. Xxxxxxx in writing that Dakwa and HEAG Xx. Xxxxxxx shall be required to engage a new IRO in accordance with Paragraph A of this Appendix. Dakwa and HEAG Xx. Xxxxxxx must engage a new IRO within 60 days of receipt of OIG’s written notice. The final determination as to whether or not to require Dakwa and HEAG Xx. Xxxxxxx to engage a new IRO shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.‌ OIG.‌‌ APPENDIX B QUARTERLY CLAIMS REVIEW‌‌‌

OIG Removal of IRO. In the event OIG has reason to believe the IRO does not possess the qualifications described in Paragraph B, is not independent and objective as set forth in Paragraph E, or has failed to carry out its responsibilities as described in Paragraph C, OIG shall notify Dakwa and HEAG Xxxxxxxx Clinic in writing regarding OIG’s basis for determining that the IRO has not met the requirements of this Appendix. Dakwa and HEAG Xxxxxxxx Clinic shall have 30 days from the date of OIG’s written notice to provide information regarding the IRO’s qualifications, independence or performance of its responsibilities in order to resolve the concerns identified by OIG. If, following OIG’s review of any information provided by Dakwa and HEAG Xxxxxxxx Clinic regarding its IRO, OIG determines that the IRO has not met the requirements of this Appendix, OIG shall notify Dakwa and HEAG Xxxxxxxx Clinic in writing that Dakwa and HEAG Xxxxxxxx Clinic shall be required to engage a new IRO in accordance with Paragraph A of this Appendix. Dakwa and HEAG Xxxxxxxx Clinic must engage a new IRO within 60 days of receipt of OIG’s written notice. The final determination as to whether or not to require Dakwa and HEAG Xxxxxxxx Clinic to engage a new IRO shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.‌ APPENDIX B QUARTERLY CLAIMS REVIEW‌‌‌REVIEW‌‌‌‌