Common use of Other Indicators Clause in Contracts

Other Indicators. The M&E Plan will contain the Indicators listed in the following tables. Objective Level Increased responsiveness of Local Government Units (LGUs) to community needs Use of inclusive Community Driven Development (CDD) processes by local governments Percentage of project municipal local government units (MLGUs) that have meetings with community representatives to solicit inputs to municipal development plans and / or percentage of barangays that reflect community priorities in their barangay development plans TBD 80% LGU provision of funds for O&M Percentage of MLGUs that provide funding support for KALAHI-CIDSS sub-project O&M 0% 80% LGU application of CDD practices to non-KALAHI- CIDSS activities Number of project MLGUs that pass ordinances / resolutions adopting CDD principles XXX XXX Increased community engagement in development activities Participation of women in local government Number of women representatives in targeted areas XXX XXX Community engagement in development activities Percentage of MCC-funded KALAHI-CIDSS-developed community organizations that have satisfactory organizational performance ratings 0% 80% Percentage of communities that attract additional funding for development activities after the KALAHI-CIDSS Project is completed 0% 30% Increased value of sub-project benefits6 Aggregate value of benefits of sub-projects. (Varies, please see below) Outcome Level Increased LGU engagement LGU provision of funds Percentage of LGUs that provide at least 80% of Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) funding requirements 0% 90% 4 As the municipalities are due to be randomly selected, baseline figures are not yet known. 5 These figures are indicative. 6 The baseline levels for these indicators will be determined by the initial round of data collection in the selected municipalities. The targets will be informed by this information and by the results of the endline data collection in KC1 areas. Table 1: M&E Indicators for KALAHI-CIDSS Project LGU provision of technical support Percentage of LGUs that provide at least 80% of MOA technical support requirements 0% 90% Increased community engagement Barangay assembly participation Percentage of barangay assemblies with 80% of community households represented TBD 80% Marginalized group participation Percentage of barangay assemblies with 65% of youth, women, indigenous people and poorest households represented TBD 80% Increased value of sub-project benefits7 Time savings XXX XXX Labor force participation (by age and gender) XXX XXX School enrollment XXX XXX Number of beneficiary farming households XXX XXX Yield of paddy rice XXX XXX Water consumption (by use) XXX XXX Use of barangay health facilities XXX XXX Post-harvest losses XXX XXX Sub-projects delivered Sub-projects completed Number of completed sub- projects (by type) 0 3400 Sub-projects sustained Sub-projects sustained Percentage of sub-projects that pass functionality audits or receive satisfactory or higher ratings of sustainability 0% 80% 7 The precise indicators, definitions, baseline level and final targets will be determined by the initial round of data collection in the selected control and treatment municipalities. The targets will be informed by this information and by the results of the endline data collection in KC1 areas. Objective Level Net incomes of road users increased Costs to road users Aggregate value of time savings (in 2009US$m)8 Xxxxxx-Xxxx- Borongan-Guiuan NA 5.2 9.5 Change in aggregate vehicle operating cost (in 2009US$m)9 Xxxxxx-Xxxx- Borongan-Guiuan NA 9.4 16.5

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Millennium Challenge Compact, Millennium Challenge Compact, Millennium Challenge Compact

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Other Indicators. Indicators are used to measure progress toward the expected results throughout the implementation period. Different types of indicators are needed at different points in time and to trace the Program logic. The M&E Plan will contain the Indicators indicators listed in Annex III as well as other indicators, including “common indicators,” necessary for MCC management oversight and communicating progress towards the achievement of compact results. Common Indicators are used by MCC to measure progress across Compacts within certain sectors and enable MCC to aggregate results across countries for reporting externally to key stakeholders. Common indicators may be specified at all indicator levels (process milestone, output, outcome, objective, and goal). The M&E Plan indicators should be kept to the minimum necessary for Program oversight, Project management and for measuring and communicating progress toward expected results for planned activities. MCA-Cape Verde II may monitor additional indicators at the Activity level for their own management and communication purposes but these need not be included in the M&E Plan nor reported to MCC, unless requested by an MCC sector lead. MCA-Cape Verde II will compile and update baselines, pending MCC written approval, for key indicators as new data becomes available. The following tablesare Indicators and Targets for the monitoring of the Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Project. Common indicators will be revised from their Annex III abbreviated form to conform to the MCC Common Indicator Guidance in the M&E Plan. Disaggregation by urban/rural, gender of head of household and other relevant categories will be identified in the M&E Plan. Objective Level Increased responsiveness Indicators Reduced household cost of Local Government Units water needs Unit cost of all water consumed by Xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx Total cost to consumer should include tariffs paid, connection costs (LGUs) to community needs Use of inclusive Community Driven Development (CDD) processes by local governments Percentage of project municipal local government units (MLGUs) that have meetings with community representatives to solicit inputs to municipal development plans direct and / or percentage of barangays that reflect community priorities in their barangay development plans TBD 80% LGU provision of funds for O&M Percentage of MLGUs that provide funding support for KALAHI-CIDSS sub-project O&M 0% 80% LGU application of CDD practices to non-KALAHI- CIDSS activities Number of project MLGUs that pass ordinances / resolutions adopting CDD principles XXX XXX Increased community engagement in development activities Participation of women in local government Number of women representatives in targeted areas XXX XXX Community engagement in development activities Percentage of MCC-funded KALAHI-CIDSS-developed community organizations that have satisfactory organizational performance ratings 0% 80% Percentage of communities that attract additional funding for development activities after the KALAHI-CIDSS Project is completed 0% 30% Increased value of sub-project benefits6 Aggregate value of benefits of sub-projects. (Variesotherwise), please see below) Outcome Level Increased LGU engagement LGU provision of funds Percentage of LGUs that provide at least 80% of Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) funding requirements 0% 90% 4 As the municipalities are due to be randomly selectedcommercial purchases, baseline figures are not yet known. 5 These figures are indicative. 6 The baseline levels for these indicators will be determined by the initial round of data collection in the selected municipalities. The targets will be informed by this information and by the results of the endline data collection in KC1 areas. Table 1: M&E Indicators for KALAHI-CIDSS Project LGU provision of technical support Percentage of LGUs that provide at least 80% of MOA technical support requirements 0% 90% Increased community engagement Barangay assembly participation Percentage of barangay assemblies with 80% of community households represented TBD 80% Marginalized group participation Percentage of barangay assemblies with 65% of youth, women, indigenous people and poorest households represented TBD 80% Increased value of sub-project benefits7 Time savings XXX XXX Labor force participation (by age and gender) XXX XXX School enrollment XXX XXX Number of beneficiary farming households XXX XXX Yield of paddy rice XXX XXX Water consumption (by use) XXX XXX Use of barangay health facilities XXX XXX Post-harvest losses XXX XXX Sub-projects delivered Sub-projects completed Number of completed sub- projects (by type) 0 3400 Sub-projects sustained Sub-projects sustained Percentage of sub-projects that pass functionality audits or receive satisfactory or higher ratings of sustainability 0% 80% 7 The precise indicators, definitions, baseline level and final targets will be determined by the initial round of data collection in the selected control and treatment municipalities. The targets will be informed by this information and by the results of the endline data collection in KC1 areas. Objective Level Net incomes of road users increased Costs to road users Aggregate value of time savings collecting water and household coping costs (direct and otherwise) due to reliability concerns. Information will be disaggregated, to the extent possible, by gender head of household and income quartiles. US$/m3 TBD TBD1 Reduced subsidies to WASH sector Value of implicit subsidy reduction TBD US$ TBD TBD2 Reduced cost of network water delivery Average recovery price of water for corporatized utilities Cost of operation + 24 hour supply factor + maintenance investment (c.f., IB-NET definitions and toolkits) US$/m3 TBD3 Greater than 15% reduction per year within two years of corporatization4 Increased population served by corporatized utilities Service coverage by corporatized utilities Percentage of national population served by regulated, corporatized utilities Percentage TBD5 506 1 Targets will be established based on assumptions of decreasing costs for populations served by regulated, corporatized utilities. Baselines and the manner of calculation will be established in 2009US$m)8 Xxxxxx-Xxxx- Borongan-Guiuan NA 5.2 9.5 Change in aggregate vehicle operating cost (in 2009US$m)9 Xxxxxx-Xxxx- Borongan-Guiuan NA 9.4 16.5collaboration with an independent impact evaluation firm, and will use a combination of statistically representative surveys.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Millennium Challenge Compact

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!