Ownership of this agreement Sample Clauses

Ownership of this agreement. This agreement was drafted by a working group of representatives of the police, health, local authorities and London Councils. These professionals were specialists in safeguarding, social work, police procedures, information governance and law. The local authority representatives worked under the banner of the Information Governance for London Group (IGfL), to draft one agreement that would work for all boroughs, CCGs and police BCUs across London. The aim is to reduce the number of versions of sharing agreements that historically differed between boroughs, partly to reduce the burden on pan- London organisations, that must have agreements with multiple boroughs. IGfL, a group of information and security professionals at London boroughs, assisted with co-ordination of this agreement, but the responsibilities within it, and compliance with data protection legislation, remain with the listed data controllers.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Ownership of this agreement. This agreement was drafted by a working group of representatives of the Metropolitan Police Service and the London Boroughs of Camden, Hammersmith and Fulham and Lewisham. These professionals were specialists in police procedures, information governance and law. The local authority representatives worked under the banner of the Information Governance for London Group (IGfL), to draft one agreement that would work for all boroughs, CCGs and police BCUs across London. The aim is to reduce the number of versions of sharing agreements that historically differed between boroughs, partly to reduce the burden on pan-London organisations that must have agreements with multiple boroughs. IGfL, a group of information and security professionals at London boroughs, assisted with co-ordination of this agreement, but the responsibilities within it, and compliance with data protection legislation, remain with the listed data controllers.
Ownership of this agreement. This agreement was drafted by a working group of representatives of the Metropolitan Police, Probation, and local authorities. These professionals were specialists in safeguarding, Prevent and Channel, police procedures, Probation, information governance and law. The local authority representatives worked under the banner of the Information Governance for London Group (IGfL), to draft one agreement that would work for all boroughs, the Probation Service, the City of London Police, British Transport Police, and all Metropolitan Police BCUs across London. The aim is to reduce the number of versions of sharing agreements that historically differed between boroughs, partly to reduce the burden on pan-London organisations that must have agreements with multiple boroughs. For ease of use throughout the document the term “Police” will refer to the Metropolitan Police Service, British Transport Police, and the City of London Police. IGfL, a group of information and security professionals at London boroughs, assisted with coordination of this agreement, but the responsibilities within it, and compliance with data protection legislation, remain with the listed data controllers.
Ownership of this agreement. This agreement was drafted by a working group of representatives of the police services, London Fire Brigade, health sector, London local authorities and London Resilience Group. These professionals were specialists in resilience, safeguarding, social work, police procedures, information governance and law. The local authority representatives worked under the banner of the Information Governance for London Group (IGfL), to draft one agreement that would work for all Local Authorities, CCGs and police BCUs across London. The aim is to reduce the number of versions of sharing agreements that historically differed between boroughs, partly to reduce the burden on pan-London organisations that must have agreements with multiple boroughs. IGfL, a group of information and security professionals at London local authorities, assisted with coordination of this agreement, but the responsibilities within it, and compliance with data protection legislation, remain with the listed data controllers.
Ownership of this agreement. This agreement was drafted by a working group of representatives of the local authorities and London Councils. These professionals were specialists in information governance and law. The local authority representatives worked under the banner of the Information Governance for London Group (IGfL), to draft one agreement that would work for all boroughs across London. The aim is to reduce the number of versions of sharing agreements that historically differed between boroughs, partly to reduce the burden on pan-London organisations, that must have agreements with multiple boroughs. IGfL, a group of information and security professionals at London boroughs, assisted with co-ordination of this agreement, but the responsibilities within it, and compliance with data protection legislation, remain with the listed data controllers.
Ownership of this agreement. This agreement was drafted by The University of Exeter, Hammersmith & Fulham Council and Camden Council.
Ownership of this agreement. This agreement was drafted by a working group of representatives of the police, local authorities and London Councils. These professionals were specialists in the troubled/supporting families programme, police procedures, information governance and law. The local authority representatives worked under the banner of the Information Governance for London Group (IGfL), to draft one agreement that would work for all boroughs and Metropolitan Police BCUs across London, and the City of London Police. The aim is to reduce the number of versions of sharing agreements that historically differed between boroughs, partly to reduce the burden on pan-London organisations that must have agreements with multiple boroughs. IGfL, a group of information and security professionals at London boroughs, assisted with coordination of this agreement, but the responsibilities within it, and compliance with data protection legislation, remain with the listed Data Controllers. The term ‘police’ refers to both the Metropolitan Police Service and the City of London Police.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Ownership of this agreement

  • SCOPE OF THIS AGREEMENT 2.1. This Agreement, including Parts A through L, Tables One and Two and exhibits, specifies the rights and obligations of each Party with respect to the establishment, purchase, and sale of Local Interconnection, Collocation, resale of Telecommunications Services and Unbundled Network Elements. Certain terms used in this Agreement shall have the meanings defined in PART A – DEFINITIONS, or as otherwise elsewhere defined throughout this Agreement. Other terms used but not defined in this Agreement will have the meanings ascribed to them in the Act and in the FCC’s and the Commission’s rules, regulations and orders. PART B sets forth the general terms and conditions governing this Agreement. The remaining Parts set forth, among other things, descriptions of the services, pricing, technical and business requirements, and physical and network security requirements.

  • Execution of this Agreement This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. The exchange of copies of this Agreement and of signature pages by facsimile or other electronic transmission shall constitute effective execution and delivery of this Agreement as to the parties and may be used in lieu of the original Agreement for all purposes.

  • Duration of this Agreement The Term of this Agreement shall be as specified in Schedule A hereto.

  • Nature of this Agreement 3.1. This Agreement is a framework agreement within the meaning of regulation 2(1) of the Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2015. Call-off Contracts are public contracts within the meaning of that regulation.

  • of this Agreement If the State elects to accept the defective or nonconforming Work, a Change Order will be issued to reflect a reduction in the Contract Sum. The Architect will recommend to the State the value of diminishment of the defective or nonconforming Work. Such adjustment shall be effected whether or not final payment has been made.

  • PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT 2.1 To comply with the provisions of Section 57(1)(b),(4B) and (5) of the Systems Act as well as the Contract of Employment entered into between the Parties;

  • Operation of this Agreement (a) This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties about its subject matter. Any previous understanding, agreement, representation or warranty relating to that subject matter is replaced by this Agreement and has no further effect.

  • EFFECT OF THIS AGREEMENT Subject to the Corporation’s right to terminate the Option pursuant to Section 7.4 of the Plan, this Option Agreement shall be assumed by, be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any successor or successors to the Corporation.

  • STATUS OF THIS AGREEMENT 4.1 This contract governs your engagement from time to time by the University as a casual worker. This is not an employment contract and does not confer any employment rights on you (other than those to which workers are entitled). In particular, it does not create any obligation on the University to provide work to you. By entering into this contract you confirm your understanding that the University makes no promise or guarantee of a minimum level of work to you and you will work on a flexible "as required" basis. It is the intention of both you and the University that there be no mutuality of obligation between the parties at any time when you are not performing an Assignment.

  • Termination of this Agreement (a) The Representative shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving notice to the Company as hereinafter specified at any time at or prior to the Closing Date or any Option Closing Date (as to the Option Shares to be purchased on such Option Closing Date only), if in the discretion of the Representative, (i) there has occurred any material adverse change in the securities markets or any event, act or occurrence that has materially disrupted, or in the opinion of the Representative, will in the future materially disrupt, the securities markets or there shall be such a material adverse change in general financial, political or economic conditions or the effect of international conditions on the financial markets in the United States is such as to make it, in the judgment of the Representative, inadvisable or impracticable to market the Shares or enforce contracts for the sale of the Shares (ii) trading in the Company’s Common Stock shall have been suspended by the Commission or Nasdaq or trading in securities generally on the Nasdaq Stock Market, the NYSE or the NYSE MKT shall have been suspended, (iii) minimum or maximum prices for trading shall have been fixed, or maximum ranges for prices for securities shall have been required, on the Nasdaq Stock Market, the NYSE or NYSE American, by such exchange or by order of the Commission or any other governmental authority having jurisdiction, (iv) a banking moratorium shall have been declared by federal or state authorities, (v) there shall have occurred any attack on, outbreak or escalation of hostilities or act of terrorism involving the United States any declaration by the United States of a national emergency or war, any substantial change or development involving a prospective substantial change in United States or other international political, financial or economic conditions or any other calamity or crisis, or (vi) the Company suffers any loss by strike, fire, flood, earthquake, accident or other calamity, whether or not covered by insurance, or (vii) in the judgment of the Representative, there has been, since the time of execution of this Agreement or since the respective dates as of which information is given in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Final Prospectus, any material adverse change in the assets, properties, condition, financial or otherwise, or in the results of operations, business affairs or business prospects of the Company, whether or not arising in the ordinary course of business. Any such termination shall be without liability of any party to any other party except that the provisions of Section 5(a)(viii) and Section 7 hereof shall at all times be effective and shall survive such termination.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!