PARTICIPANT RESPONSES Sample Clauses

PARTICIPANT RESPONSES. All 34 images were reviewed by 22 experts, for a total of 748 diagnosis and quality responses. A diagnosis of can- not determine was made in 18 of 748 cases (2%). Among 748 cases, image quality was scored as adequate in 656 cases (88%), possibly adequate in 72 cases (10%), and inadequate for diagnosis in 20 cases (3%). Overall diagnostic responses are summarized in the Table. Three of 34 images (9%) were classified as plus by all 22 experts. In the 3-level categorization, 1 image (3%) was classified as neither plus nor pre-plus by all 22 experts, and no images were classified as pre-plus by all 22 experts. In the 2-level classification, 4 of 34 images (12%) were classified as not plus by all experts who pro- vided a diagnosis. Representative images and responses are shown in Figure 1. INTEREXPERT AGREEMENT Figure 2 shows absolute agreement in plus disease di- agnosis, based on the percentage of experts who as- signed the same diagnosis to each image. For example, the same 3-level diagnosis was made by at least 90% of experts in 6 images (18%) and by at least 80% of experts in 7 images (21%). The same 2-level diagnosis was made by at least 90% of experts in 20 images (59%) and by at least 80% of experts in 24 images (71%). The mean n statistics for each expert compared with all others are shown in Figure 3. In the 3-level categoriza- tion, the mean weighted n statistic for each expert com- pared with all others was between 0.21 and 0.40 (fair agree- ment) for 7 experts (32%) and between 0.41 and 0.60 (moderate agreement) for 15 experts (68%). In the 2-level categorization, the mean n statistic for each expert com- pared with all others was between 0 and 0.20 (slight agree- ment) for 1 expert (5%), between 0.21 and 0.40 (fair agree- ment) for 3 experts (14%), between 0.41 and 0.60 (moderate agreement) for 12 experts (55%), and between 0.61 and 0.80 (substantial agreement) for 6 experts (27%). There were no statistically significant differences in mean n or weighted n statistics based on the following expert characteristics: working in vs not working in an institu- tion with a RetCam, having published at least 5 vs fewer than 5 peer-reviewed ROP manuscripts, type of ophthal- mologist (pediatric vs retina specialist), self-reported level of experience interpreting RetCam images (extensive, lim- ited, or none), status as a principal investigator vs not a principal investigator in the CRYO-ROP or ETROP study, or status as a certified investigator vs not a certif...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to PARTICIPANT RESPONSES

  • Participant Responsibilities The SFS scholarship participant agrees to the following:

  • Participant Information My address is: My Social Security Number is:

  • Tenant Responsibilities (a) Tenant shall immediately notify the Project Manager of the damage and intent to xxxxx rent, when the damage is or becomes sufficiently severe that Tenant believes he/she is justified in abating rent. [966.4 (h)(1)]

  • Tenant Responsibility Good housekeeping is expected of everyone. Tenant agrees to keep quarters clean and in a sanitary condition. The Tenants agree not to permit any deterioration or destruction to occur while they are occupying the property.

  • Consultant Responsibilities 12.1. Consultant must make prompt payment for any claims for labor, materials, or services furnished to Consultant by any person in connection with this Agreement as such claims become due. Consultant shall not permit any liens or claims to be filed or prosecuted against the City on account of any labor or material furnished to or on behalf of Consultant. If Consultant fails, neglects, or refuses to make prompt payment of any such claim, the City may, but shall not be obligated to, pay such claim to the person furnishing the labor, materials, or services and offset the amount of the payment against funds due or to become due to Consultant under this Agreement. The City may also recover any such amounts directly from Consultant.

  • Personnel Participant Conditions The Subrecipient shall include the following clauses in every Subcontract or purchase order, specifically or by reference, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor.

  • Participant Obligations In partial consideration for the award of these PSUs, if at any time during the period between the Grant Date and the 12-month period following the Participant’s termination of Employment (the “Obligation Period”), the Participant: (i) directly or indirectly, hires or solicits or arranges for the hiring or solicitation of any employee of the Company or its Affiliates, or encourages any employee to leave the Company; (ii) directly or indirectly, assist in soliciting in competition with the Company the business of any current customer, distributor or dealer or other sales or distribution channel partners of the Company; (iii) uses, discloses, misappropriates or transfers confidential or proprietary information concerning the Company or its Affiliates (except as required by the Participant’s work responsibilities with the Company or its Affiliates); or (iv) engages in any activity in violation of Company policies, including the Company’s Code of Conduct, or engages in conduct materially adverse to the best interests of the Company or its Affiliates; the PSUs, whether previously vested or not, may be cancelled in full, and the Participant may be required to return to the Company any shares received on settlement of vested PSUs or the net after-tax income from any disposition of any shares received upon settlement of vested PSUs, unless the Committee, in its sole discretion, elects not to cancel the PSUs and/or elects not to recover any income from settled and vested PSUs or unless applicable law prohibits such action. The obligations in this subsection are in addition to any other agreements related to non-solicitation and preservation of Company confidential and proprietary information entered into between the Participant and the Company, or otherwise applicable to the Participant, and nothing in this Agreement is intended to waive, modify, alter or amend the terms of any such other agreement. THE PARTICIPANT UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS SUBSECTION IS NOT INTENDED TO AND DOES NOT PROHIBIT THE CONDUCT DESCRIBED, BUT PROVIDES FOR THE CANCELLATION OF THE AWARD IN FULL AND A RETURN TO THE COMPANY OF ANY SHARES RECEIVED ON SETTLEMENT OF VESTED PSUS OR THE NET AFTER-TAX INCOME FROM THE DISPOSITION OF ANY SHARES RECEIVED UPON SETTLEMENT OF VESTED PSUS IF THE PARTICIPANT SHOULD CHOOSE TO VIOLATE THIS PARAGRAPH DURING THE OBLIGATION PERIOD. Nothing in this Agreement prohibits the Participant from voluntarily communicating, without notice to or approval by the Company, with any federal government agency about a potential violation of a federal law or regulation.

  • Client Responsibilities You are responsible for (a) assessing each participants’ suitability for the Training, (b) enrollment in the appropriate course(s) and (c) your participants’ attendance at scheduled courses.

  • Lobbying Activities - Standard Form - LLL No response Do not upload this form unless Vendor has reportable lobbying activities. There are Attributes entitled, “2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Xxxx Anti-Lobbying Amendment – Continued.” Properly respond to those Attributes and only upload this form if applicable/instructed. If upload is required based on your response to those Attributes, the Disclosure of Lobbying Activities – Standard Form - LLL must be downloaded from the “Attachments” section of the IonWave eBid System, reviewed, properly completed, and uploaded to this location.

  • Joint Responsibilities 2.1.1 University and Affiliate each will identify, and notify each other of, a person responsible for serving as its liaison during the course of this affiliation. The appointment of liaisons shall be subject to mutual approval of the parties.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.