PELAGIC LONGLINE BYCATCH MITIGATION Sample Clauses

PELAGIC LONGLINE BYCATCH MITIGATION. Review of current mitigation for pelagic longline gear A major product of previous SBWG meetings has been a review of information on current mitigation research for pelagic long-line fisheries and the identification of knowledge gaps (AC3 Doc 14 Rev 4, Appendix 4, Table 2; AC4 Doc 14 Rev 4, Annex 5). The advice embodied in the table has been distributed to some of the tuna RFMOs, where it has been well received. At this year‘s meeting the Working Group reviewed and updated the information in this table, following presentation of a number of papers which dealt comprehensively with design of Bird Scaring Lines, and the impact on line sink rates of line shooters, bait life-status, placement and amount of weight in relation to the hook, and bait thaw status (SBWG-3 Doc 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 Rev1 and 31). The results of this review are attached as Annex 3. As before, it is recommended that the Advisory Committee endorse this advice and encourage Parties to use this information to guide the development of policy and practice within the fisheries under their jurisdiction. These papers highlighted a number of issues relevant to mitigation of seabird bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries and provided, for the first time, information on the effectiveness of mitigation measures that have been advocated for many years, without appropriate empirical evidence. This information is summarised below: — Bird Scaring Lines, of either conventional or ‗light‘ design, and used in either single or double configuration, are inadequate for reducing seabird bycatch when used without other mitigation measures. To be effective they must be used with branchline weighting and/or night setting. — Weighting regime and sink rates. Adding weight to lines to expedite gear sink rates is the most effective method of reducing seabird mortality in longline fisheries. The influence of line weighting on seabird mortality is only partially understood. Research on line weighting is still in progress and head-to-head comparisons of the effectiveness of line weighting regimes (and associated sink rates) as seabird deterrent are encouraged, together with further studies on the economics of fishing under prescribed weighting regimes. When considering sink rates to target depths it is necessary to recognise the importance of the ―initial‖ (e.g., 0-2 m) and ―final‖ (e.g., 4-6 m, or thereabouts) sink rates. A fast initial sink rate reduces visual cues in the critical shallow depths and a fast final rate max...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PELAGIC LONGLINE BYCATCH MITIGATION. 15.2.1 The SBWG reviewed recent developments in seabird bycatch mitigation technologies by its members and others. These developments included updates on line weighting trials, an underwater bait setter, hook pods, bird scaring lines and the performance of weighted versus unweighted branchlines deployed in combination with paired bird scaring lines during day and night.
PELAGIC LONGLINE BYCATCH MITIGATION 

Related to PELAGIC LONGLINE BYCATCH MITIGATION

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract.

  • Required Coverages For Generation Resources Of 20 Megawatts Or Less Each Constructing Entity shall maintain the types of insurance as described in section 11.1 paragraphs (a) through (e) above in an amount sufficient to insure against all reasonably foreseeable direct liabilities given the size and nature of the generating equipment being interconnected, the interconnection itself, and the characteristics of the system to which the interconnection is made. Additional insurance may be required by the Interconnection Customer, as a function of owning and operating a Generating Facility. All insurance shall be procured from insurance companies rated “A-,” VII or better by AM Best and authorized to do business in a state or states in which the Interconnection Facilities are located. Failure to maintain required insurance shall be a Breach of the Interconnection Construction Service Agreement.

  • Course Curriculum, Instruction, and Grading X. Xxxx College courses offered as dual credit, regardless of where they are taught, follow the same syllabus, course outline, textbook, grading method, and other academic policies as the courses outlined in the Hill College catalog.

  • COMMERCIAL REUSE OF SERVICES The member or user herein agrees not to replicate, duplicate, copy, trade, sell, resell nor exploit for any commercial reason any part, use of, or access to 's sites.

  • Products and Completed Operations Personal Injury Liability Contractual Liability The policy shall be on an occurrence form and limits shall not be less than: $1,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 General Aggregate $1,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate $1,000,000 Personal & Advertising Injury Automotive Liability: The Party shall carry automotive liability insurance covering all motor vehicles, including hired and non-owned coverage, used in connection with the Agreement. Limits of coverage shall not be less than $500,000 combined single limit. If performance of this Agreement involves construction, or the transport of persons or hazardous materials, limits of coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 combined single limit.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement The PI agrees that information about themselves and the approved research use will be posted publicly on the dbGaP website. The information includes the PI’s name and Requester, project name, Research Use Statement, and a Non-Technical Summary of the Research Use Statement. In addition, and if applicable, this information may include the Cloud Computing Use Statement and name of the CSP or PCS. Citations of publications resulting from the use of controlled-access datasets obtained through this DAR may also be posted on the dbGaP website.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.