Common use of Plant F49 Clause in Contracts

Plant F49. ISSUE: San Xxxxxxx budgeted $4,000,000 to construct an ion-exchange treatment system at Plant F49 in order to remove perchlorate from the groundwater produced by Well F49A. The budget included $600,000 in company funds and $3,400,000 in Contributions in Aid of Construction (“CIAC”). XXX does not oppose the project as requested, but recommended authorizing the project as an Advice Letter Project contingent on San Xxxxxxx securing the anticipated $3,400,000 in CIAC from parties responsible for the perchlorate contamination, and/or grants from governmental agencies. RESOLUTION: San Gabriel agrees to remove this ion-exchange treatment project from consideration in this GRC. XXX expects San Xxxxxxx will vigorously “pursue funding from the parties responsible for the perchlorate pollution as well as grants from public agencies” to fund this project, as indicated in its response to DRA’s data request KKE-005, 3b. Issue SGV Direct SGV Rebuttal DRA Report Difference Settlement Plant F49 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 (Advice Letter) $0 $0 REFERENCES: Exhibit SG-12 (Xxxxxxx), p. 22 and Attachment C; Exhibit DRA-1 (Xxxxx), pp. 7-25 to 7-26; Exhibit SG-25 (Yucelen), p. 24.

Appears in 6 contracts

Samples: Settlement Agreement, Settlement Agreement, Settlement Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.