Common use of Plant F53 Clause in Contracts

Plant F53. ISSUE: San Xxxxxxx requested $2,300,000 for a rerouting project at Plant F53 to improve the energy efficiency of its water system. As part of this project, San Xxxxxxx proposed to acquire land, perform grading, construct a booster station, water storage reservoir, fence and wall, and related site, landscaping and street improvements. XXX recommended the Commission reject San Gabriel’s request for all plant investments associated with the rerouting project, citing the need for a cost-benefit analysis. RESOLUTION: XXX agrees to San Gabriel’s reduced dollar request to fund only the construction of a storage tank and directly related site improvements. The Parties agree not to fund any improvements at this site associated with the reroute project that are not directly related to the proposed tank construction. Issue SGV Direct SGV Rebuttal DRA Report Difference Settlement Plant F53 (2011-2014) $2,300,000 $2,300,000 $0 $2,300,000 $1,715,000 REFERENCES: Exhibit SG-12 (Xxxxxxx), pp. 22-23 and Attachment C, Section Plant F53; Exhibit DRA-1 (Xxxxx), pp. 7-26 to 7-28; Exhibit SG-25 (Yucelen), pp. 24- 26.