Position Classification Review. An employee may request an audit of his/her position to determine if the assigned classification is still appropriate. The immediate supervisor shall be notified of this audit request. All requests will be handled by the Human Resource Office. Reasonable work time shall be provided for the employee to consult with their supervisor and to prepare an updated job description. The supervisor has up to fifteen (15) workdays to finalize and submit an updated job description to Human Resources. Absent any unforeseen circumstances, reviews shall generally be completed within 45 calendar days of the date the complete position review request is submitted to Human Resources. The results of the review will be provided to the supervisor of the position and the affected employee. If the audit substantiates that an employee has been performing the duties of a higher- rated classification, the employee shall be reclassified/reallocated effective the beginning date of the pay period in which the audit was conducted, provided the employee has passed the appropriate examination for the position. The employee will be paid at the higher rate effective the same date as the reclassification/reallocation. If the employee has not passed the appropriate examination, the effective date of any salary increase and reclassification/reallocation shall be the beginning date of the pay period following the date on which the employee passes the appropriate examination. If the employee disagrees with the findings of the audit, they may request further review within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the results. Additional review will be made by the Director, Civil Service/Student Employment and Employee Relations (or designee), with the results furnished to the affected employee within thirty (30) calendar days. If the employee disagrees with these findings, they may only seek further classification review by the State Universities Civil Service System in accordance with the Statute and Rules of that system.
Appears in 3 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Position Classification Review. An employee may request an audit of his/her position to determine if the assigned classification is still appropriate. The immediate supervisor shall be notified of this audit request. All requests will be handled by the Human Resource OfficeResources. Reasonable work time shall be provided for the employee to consult with their supervisor and to prepare an updated job description. The supervisor has up to fifteen (15) workdays work days to finalize and submit sign off on an updated job description and to forward it to Human Resources. Absent any unforeseen circumstances, reviews shall generally be completed within 45 thirty (30) calendar days of the date the complete position review request packet is submitted to received by Human Resources. The results of the review will be provided to the supervisor of the position and the affected employee. If the audit substantiates that an employee has been performing the duties of a higher- higher-rated classification, the employee shall be reclassified/reallocated effective the beginning date of the pay period in which the audit was conducted, provided the employee has passed the appropriate examination for the position. The employee will be paid at the higher rate effective the same date as the reclassification/reallocation. If the employee has not passed the appropriate examination, the effective date of any salary increase and reclassification/reallocation shall be the beginning date of the pay period following the date on which the employee passes the appropriate examination. If the employee disagrees with the findings of the audit, they may request further review within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the results. Additional review will be made by the Director, Civil Service/Student Employment and Employee Relations (or designee), with the results furnished to the affected employee within thirty (30) calendar days. If the employee disagrees with these findings, they may only seek further classification review by the State Universities Civil Service System in accordance with the Statute and Rules of that system.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Position Classification Review. An employee may request an audit of his/her position to determine if the assigned classification is still appropriate. The immediate supervisor shall be notified of this audit request. All requests will be handled by the Office of Human Resource OfficeResources. Reasonable work time shall be provided for the employee to consult with their supervisor and to prepare an updated job descriptionjobdescription. The supervisor has up to fifteen (15) workdays work days to finalize and submit sign off on an updated job description and to forward it to the Office of Human Resources. Absent any unforeseen circumstances, reviews shall generally be completed within 45 calendar ceanl dar days of the date the complete position review request packet is submitted to received by Human Resources. The results of the review will be provided to the supervisor of the position and the affected employee. If the audit substantiates that an employee has been performing the duties udties of a higher- higher-rated classification, the employee shall be reclassified/reallocated reclassified effective the beginning date of the pay period in which the audit was conducted, provided the employee has passed the appropriate examination for the position. The employee will be paid at the higher rate effective the same date as the reclassification/reallocation. If the employee has not passed the appropriate examination, the effective date of any salary increase and reclassification/reallocation reclassification shall be the beginning date of the pay period following the date thedate on which the employee passes the appropriate examination. If the employee disagrees with the findings of the audit, they may request further review within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the results. Additional review will be made by the Director, Civil Service/Student Employment and Employee Relations (Asstiant Vice President for Human Resources or designee), with the results furnished to the affected employee within thirty (30) calendar days. If the employee disagrees with these findings, they may only seek further classification review by the State Universities Civil Service System in accordance with the Statute and Rules of that system.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Labor Agreement
Position Classification Review. An employee may request an audit of his/her position to determine if the assigned classification is still appropriate. The immediate supervisor shall be notified of this audit request. All requests will be handled by the Human Resource OfficeResources. Reasonable work time shall be provided for the employee to consult with their supervisor and to prepare an updated job description. The supervisor has up to fifteen (15) workdays work days to finalize and submit sign off on an updated job description and to forward it to Human Resources. Absent any unforeseen circumstances, reviews shall generally be completed within 45 thirty (30) calendar days of the date the complete position review request packet is submitted to received by Human Resources. The results of the review will be provided to the supervisor of the position and the affected employee. If the audit substantiates that an employee has been performing the duties of a higher- rated classification, the employee shall be reclassified/reallocated effective the beginning date of the pay period in which the audit was conducted, provided the employee has passed the appropriate examination for the position. The employee will be paid at the higher rate effective the same date as the reclassification/reallocation. If the employee has not passed the appropriate examination, the effective date of any salary increase and reclassification/reallocation shall be the beginning date of the pay period following the date on which the employee passes the appropriate examination. If the employee disagrees with the findings of the audit, they may request further review within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the results. Additional review will be made by the Director, Civil Service/Student Employment and Employee Relations (or designee), with the results furnished to the affected employee within thirty (30) calendar days. If the employee disagrees with these findings, they may only seek further classification review by the State Universities Civil Service System in accordance with the Statute and Rules of that system.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Position Classification Review. An employee may request an audit of his/her the appropriateness of their position to determine if the assigned classification is still appropriateclassification. The immediate supervisor shall be notified of this audit request. All Such requests will be handled by the appropriate Human Resource Resources Office, and the results of the audit will be issued by such office. Reasonable work time shall be provided for the employee to consult with their supervisor and for the employee to prepare an updated job description. The supervisor has up to fifteen (15) workdays to finalize and submit an updated job description to An additional review may be requested from the Associate Vice Chancellor for Human ResourcesResources or designee. Absent any unforeseen circumstances, reviews shall generally Such audit or review should be completed within 45 thirty (30) calendar days of the date the complete position review audit request is submitted received in the personnel office or within thirty (30) calendar days of the request for review, with the results furnished to the affected employee(s). An employee may request further review by the University Administration Office of Human Resources, to be completed within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt, with the results furnished to the affected employee(s). The results of time limits specified above may be extended for good cause by the review will be provided to the supervisor of the position and the affected employeeEmployer. If the audit substantiates that an employee has been performing the duties of a higher- higher-rated classification, the employee shall be reclassified/reallocated paid the higher rate (if the duties of the employee are not reduced) effective the beginning date of the pay period in which after the audit was conducted, provided employee receives the results of the audit. This will happen if the employee has passed the appropriate examination required for the position. The employee will be paid at the higher rate effective the same date as the reclassification/reallocationhigher-rated classification. If the employee has not passed the appropriate examination, the effective date of any salary increase and reclassification/reallocation reclassification shall be the beginning date of the pay period following the date on which the employee passes notice of passing the appropriate examination. If the The employee disagrees with the findings of the audit, they may request further review within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the results. Additional review will be made by the Director, Civil Service/Student Employment and Employee Relations (or designee), with the results furnished to the affected employee within thirty (30) calendar days. If the employee disagrees with these findings, they may only seek further classification review only by the State Universities Civil Service System in accordance with the Statute Civil Service System rules and Rules of that systemprocedures.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Position Classification Review.
1. An employee may wishing to request an audit of hisa position classification review will submit a completed request to the Department Head/her position Director and simultaneously send a copy to determine if the assigned classification is still appropriateappropriate personnel office on forms designed by Rutgers. The immediate supervisor shall be notified personnel office will complete such review within eight (8) weeks, with a two (2) week extension if necessary, after signoff of this audit requestthe forms by the Vice President/Xxxxxxx, or consultation by University Human Resources with the employee’s department. All requests Compensation for any new job classification will be handled by the Human Resource Office. Reasonable work time shall be provided for the employee to consult with their supervisor and to prepare an updated job description. The supervisor has up to fifteen (15) workdays to finalize and submit an updated job description to Human Resources. Absent any unforeseen circumstances, reviews shall generally be completed within 45 calendar days of the date the complete position review request is submitted to Human Resources. The results of the review will be provided effective retroactively to the supervisor payroll begin date following receipt of the position and the affected employee. If the audit substantiates that an employee has been performing the duties of a higher- rated classification, the employee shall be reclassified/reallocated effective the beginning date of the pay period in which the audit was conducted, provided the employee has passed completed request for review materials at the appropriate examination for the position. The employee will be paid at the higher rate effective the same date as the reclassification/reallocationpersonnel office.
2. If the employee has not passed is dissatisfied with the appropriate examination, the effective date of any salary increase and reclassification/reallocation shall be the beginning date results of the pay period following review, he/she may appeal within six (6) weeks to the date on which Office of Wage & Salary Administration for a second review of the employee passes the appropriate examinationclassification material. Such review will be completed within six (6) weeks with a two (2) week extension if necessary.
3. If the employee disagrees and the Union are dissatisfied with the findings decision of this first appeal the Union may, within thirty (30) days of receipt of that decision, submit the appeal to a neutral Classification Review Officer (CRO). The Classification Review Officer, who will be an expert in the field of salary and classification, will be selected mutually by the Union and the University and will serve for the duration of the audit, they may request further review Agreement. The Classification Review Officer will consider each case appealed to him/her on its individual merits and any determination by the Classification Review Officer will not be applicable to other employees. The Classification Review Officer will conduct hearings in an expeditious and informal manner. The Classification Review Officer will submit his/her written recommendations to the parties within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt the hearing date or any extension mutually agreed to by the parties.
4. The determination of the resultsClassification Review Officer will not be denied arbitrarily by the University; the University will provide reasons in writing for any denial of a Classification Review Officer determination. Additional A decision by the University not to reclassify an individual position whose reclassification has been recommended by the CRO will not be made for budgetary reasons.
5. If a position classification review is requested of Wage & Salary by other than the incumbent in the position, the incumbent shall be informed by Wage & Salary that such a review has been initiated. Contents of the job description submitted and the decision of Wage & Salary will be made shared by the Director, Civil Service/Student Employment and Employee Relations (or designee)department with the incumbent. The employee has the right to respond in writing to Wage & Salary, with a copy to his/her supervisor, concerning all data submitted to Wage & Salary.
6. Wage & Salary will inform the results furnished Union of any change in the form and the rationale for the change.
7. When an employee's position has been reclassified to a lower level, the affected employee within thirty (30) calendar daysmay accept the downgrade; may use the layoff, bumping procedure or may appeal the downgrade through steps two and three of this procedure. If the latter option is chosen, no salary reduction will be implemented until the payroll begin date after the final decision is made.
8. The University shall provide notice to AFSCME Local 1761 when an employee and position are removed from the bargaining unit. Requests by AFSCME Local 1761 for documentation in support of the removal of an employee and position from the bargaining unit shall not be unreasonably denied. If Local 1761 requests a meeting to discuss the removal of an employee and position from the bargaining unit, a meeting will be held. If possible, Rutgers will provide notice of said removal and/or hold a meeting prior to the position being removed from the bargaining unit. If AFSCME Local 1761 disagrees with these findingsthe decision of Rutgers to remove an employee and position from the bargaining unit, they may only seek further classification review AFSCME Local 1761 shall retain all rights under law to challenge the decision of Rutgers, including direct filings for arbitration, and Rutgers shall retain all rights, remedies and defenses against any claim filed by the State Universities Civil Service System in accordance with the Statute and Rules of that systemAFSCME Local 1761.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement