Positive event agreement Sample Clauses

Positive event agreement and event duration agreement The kappa statistic gives an overall assessment of the expert agreement; however, its calculation is based on the binary response for each of the arbitrarily pre-determined time epochs and thus may lose some information regarding the characteristics of the identified events. Therefore, in this study, we calculated an additional IRA statistic that combines two event-related agreement statistics: (1) the fraction of event agreement (FEA), and (2) the fraction of event duration agreement (FEDA). One may interpret FEA as the ‘‘inter-rater sensitivity’’, i.e., if an event is marked by Rater A, how likely it will also be marked by Rater B, and vice versa. The FEA is calculated between a pair of raters as the number of events agreed (with a minimum overlap of 1 s) by both raters divided by the sum of agreed and disagreed events. It is worth not- ing that, if Rater B marked two events that both overlapped with the same event marked by Rater A, only one ‘‘agreed’’ event was included in the FEA calculation. Fig. 2 gives a schematic example of the FEA calculation. In this example, Rater A marked a total of Fig. 1. Marking of a seizure event – this 10-s EEG page contains the first 7 s of a seizure (onset marked by a red vertical line). 1664 X.X. Xxxxxxx et al. / Clinical Neurophysiology 126 (2015) 1661–1669‌ 5 events, whereas Rater B marked 6 events, among which two overlapped the fourth event marked by Rater X. Xxxxx, the total number of the agreed events by Raters A and B is 4 and the number of disagreed events is 2, and therefore, the FEA between Raters A and B is 0.67. — ·· · — — ·· · In order to take into account the agreement on event durations, FEDA is calculated between two raters as the mean ratio of over- lapped duration of an agreed event to the total duration of that event. Mathematically speaking, suppose that an event is marked by Rater A with a duration of X seconds and a (similar) event is marked by Rater B with duration of Y seconds, and the two marked events have an overlapped interval of Z seconds, then the FEA was calculated as Z/(X + Y Z). For cases that one marked event is overlapped with multiple events marked by the other rater, the calculation is extended to (Z1 + Z2 + )/(X + Y1 Z1 + Y2 Z2 + ). The FEDA gives a quantitation of how specific the agreement between two raters is with respect to timing and duration of the marked events. Since both FEA and FEDA have a range between 0 and 1 and a perfect event agreement betw...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Positive event agreement

  • Agreement Amount The Grantee acknowledges and agrees that, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the maximum amount payable by the City under this Agreement for the initial ## month term shall not exceed the amount approved by City Council, which is $ (dollar amount), and $ (dollar amount) per ## month extension option, for a total Agreement amount of $ . Continuation of the Agreement beyond the initial ## months is specifically contingent upon the availability and allocation of funding, and authorization by City Council.

  • Paid Claims without Supporting Documentation Any Paid Claim for which Practitioner cannot produce documentation shall be considered an error and the total reimbursement received by Practitioner for such Paid Claim shall be deemed an Overpayment. Replacement sampling for Paid Claims with missing documentation is not permitted.

  • Reaching Agreement When agreement is reached covering the areas under discussion, the proposed Agreement shall be reduced in writing as a memorandum of understanding and signed by a representative of each negotiating team. Agreement on individual items during the negotiations is binding only when all items are agreed upon. Procedures for ratification of the Agreement by the Association and the Board shall be completed within ten (10) school days after the conclusion of negotiations.

  • PROVISIONAL AGREEMENT RESULTING FROM INTERINSTITUTIONAL NEGOTIATIONS Subject: Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Pan- European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) (COM(2017)0343 – C8-0219/2017 – 2017/0143(COD)) The interinstitutional negotiations on the aforementioned proposal for a regulation have led to a compromise. In accordance with Rule 69f(4) of the Rules of Procedure, the provisional agreement, reproduced below, is submitted as a whole to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs for decision by way of a single vote. AG\1177088EN.docx PE634.848v01-00 EN United in diversity EN REGULATION (EU) 2019/... OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of ... on a pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments, Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee1, Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure2,

  • Variation of Management Agreement The State and the Company agree to vary the Management Agreement by:-

  • Definitive Agreement Customer’s substitution right and Boeing’s obligation in this Letter Agreement are further conditioned upon Customer’s and Boeing’s executing a definitive agreement for the purchase of the Substitute Aircraft within [*] days of Customer’s substitution notice to Boeing or of Customer’s acceptance of an alternate delivery month in accordance with paragraph 2. above.

  • VARIATION TO AGREEMENT 21.1 You agree the NZOC has the right to amend this Agreement at any time prior to the Nomination Date. Any amendment to this Agreement after the Nomination Date, will only be valid if it is in writing and signed by you.

  • Variation Agreement (1) The First Variation Agreement is ratified.

  • CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE This Agreement shall be sufficient evidence of the matters specified herein and may be produced in court as evidence of the matters specified herein without the need to call for further or other evidence.

  • Goals and Objectives of the Agreement Agreement Goals The goals of this Agreement are to: ● Reduce wildfire risk related to the tree mortality crisis; ● Provide a financial model for funding and scaling proactive forestry management and wildfire remediation; ● Produce renewable bioenergy to spur uptake of tariffs in support of Senate Bill 1122 Bio Market Agreement Tariff (BioMat) for renewable bioenergy projects, and to meet California’s other statutory energy goals; ● Create clean energy jobs throughout the state; ● Reduce energy costs by generating cheap net-metered energy; ● Accelerate the deployment of distributed biomass gasification in California; and ● Mitigate climate change through the avoidance of conventional energy generation and the sequestration of fixed carbon from biomass waste. Ratepayer Benefits:2 This Agreement will result in the ratepayer benefits of greater electricity reliability, lower costs, and increased safety by creating a strong market demand for forestry biomass waste and generating cheap energy. This demand will increase safety by creating an economic driver to support forest thinning, thus reducing the risk of catastrophic wildfire and the associated damage to investor-owned utility (IOU) infrastructure, such as transmission lines and remote substations. Preventing this damage to or destruction of ratepayer-supported infrastructure lowers costs for ratepayers. Additionally, the ability of IOUs to use a higher- capacity Powertainer provides a much larger offset against the yearly billion-dollar vegetation management costs borne by IOUs (and hence by ratepayers). The PT+’s significant increase in waste processing capacity also significantly speeds up and improves the economics of wildfire risk reduction, magnifying the benefits listed above. The PT+ will directly increase PG&E’s grid reliability by reducing peak loading by up to 250 kilowatt (kW), and has the potential to increase grid reliability significantly when deployed at scale. The technology will provide on-demand, non- weather dependent, renewable energy. The uniquely flexible nature of this energy will offer grid managers new tools to enhance grid stability and reliability. The technology can be used to provide local capacity in hard-to-serve areas, while reducing peak demand. Technological Advancement and Breakthroughs:3 This Agreement will lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers to the achievement of California’s statutory energy goals by substantially reducing the LCOE of distributed gasification, helping drive uptake of the undersubscribed BioMAT program and increasing the potential for mass commercial deployment of distributed biomass gasification technology, particularly through net energy metering. This breakthrough will help California achieve its goal of developing bioenergy markets (Bioenergy Action Plan 2012) and fulfil its ambitious renewable portfolio standard (SB X1-2, 2011-2012; SB350, 2015). The PT+ will also help overcome barriers to achieving California’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction (AB 32, 2006) and air quality improvement goals. It reduces greenhouse gas and criteria pollutants over three primary pathways: 1) The PT+’s increased capacity and Combined Heat and Power (CHP) module expand the displacement of emissions from conventional generation; 2) the biochar offtake enables the sequestration of hundreds of tons carbon that would otherwise have been released into the atmosphere; and 3) its increased processing capacity avoids GHG and criteria emissions by reducing the risk of GHG emissions from wildfire and other forms of disposal, such as open pile burning or decomposition. The carbon sequestration potential of the biochar offtake is particularly groundbreaking because very few technologies exist that can essentially sequester atmospheric carbon, which is what the PT+ enables when paired with the natural forest ecosystem––an innovative and groundbreaking bio-energy technology, with carbon capture and storage. Additionally, as noted in the Governor’s Clean Energy Jobs Plan (2011), clean energy jobs are a critical component of 2 California Public Resources Code, Section 25711.5(a) requires projects funded by the Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) to result in ratepayer benefits. The California Public Utilities Commission, which established the EPIC in 2011, defines ratepayer benefits as greater reliability, lower costs, and increased safety (See CPUC “Phase 2” Decision 00-00-000 at page 19, May 24, 2012, xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xx.xxx/PublishedDocs/WORD_PDF/FINAL_DECISION/167664.PDF). 3 California Public Resources Code, Section 25711.5(a) also requires EPIC-funded projects to lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers that prevent the achievement of the state’s statutory and energy goals. California’s energy goals. When deployed at scale, the PT+ will result in the creation of thousands of jobs across multiple sectors, including manufacturing, feedstock supply chain (harvesting, processing, and transportation), equipment operation, construction, and project development. Additional Co-benefits: ● Annual electricity and thermal savings; ● Expansion of forestry waste markets; ● Expansion/development of an agricultural biochar market; ● Peak load reduction; ● Flexible generation; ● Energy cost reductions; ● Reduced wildfire risk; ● Local air quality benefits; ● Water use reductions (through energy savings); and ● Watershed benefits.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.