Possible MCO-Requested Disenrollment Sample Clauses

Possible MCO-Requested Disenrollment. If the MCO decides that it cannot establish a cost-effective care plan for supporting a member’s outcomes and assuring health and safety during the absence, it may request Department approval for disenrollment. In considering whether to allow an MCO-requested disenrollment, the Department will expect the MCO to demonstrate that it is unable to continue to support the member’s outcomes and assure the member’s health and safety with reasonable cost and effort. The member will be given the opportunity to challenge this contention and demonstrate that her/his outcomes can be met and health and safety assured with reasonable cost and effort, which could include a SDS plan.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Possible MCO-Requested Disenrollment. If the MCO decides that it cannot establish a cost-effective care plan for supporting a member’s outcomes and assuring health and safety during the absence, it may request Department approval for disenrollment. In considering whether to allow an MCO-requested disenrollment, the Department will expect the MCO to demonstrate that it is unable to continue to support the member’s outcomes and assure the member’s health and safety with reasonable cost and effort. The member will be given the opportunity to challenge this contention and demonstrate that her/his outcomes can be met and health and safety assured with reasonable cost and effort, which could include a SDS plan. MCO Responsibilities When a Member Changes County of Residence Definition Geographic Service Region (GSR) means a county or group of counties for which the MCO has applied and been certified by the Department to provide the Family Care benefit, the Family Care-Partnership benefit, or both.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Possible MCO-Requested Disenrollment. If the MCO decides that it cannot establish a cost-effective care plan for supporting a member’s outcomes and assuring health and safety during the absence, it may request Department approval for disenrollment.
Sample 1

Related to Possible MCO-Requested Disenrollment

  • Why did I get this Notice This is a court-authorized notice of a proposed Settlement in a class action lawsuit, Xxxxxx x. Loews Chicago Hotel, Inc., et. al., Case No. 19-cv-3195, pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. The Settlement would resolve a lawsuit brought on behalf of persons who allege that Loews Corporation; Loews COH Operating Company, LLC; Loews Chicago Hotel, Inc.; and Loews Chicago Operating Company, LLC (collectively, “Loews” or “Defendants”) required workers to provide their biometric identifier and/or biometric information for timekeeping or key control purposes without first providing them with legally-required written disclosures and obtaining written consent. Defendants contest these claims and deny that they violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act. If you received this Notice, you have been identified as a member of the Settlement Class. The Court has granted preliminary approval of the Settlement and has conditionally certified the Settlement Class for purposes of settlement only. This Notice explains the nature of the class action lawsuit, the terms of the Settlement, and the legal rights and obligations of the Settlement Class Members. Please read the instructions and explanations below so that you can better understand your legal rights. WHAT IS THIS LAWSUIT ABOUT? The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”), 740 ILCS 14/1, et seq., prohibits private companies from capturing, obtaining, storing, transferring, and/or using the biometric identifiers and/or information, such as fingerprints, of another individual for any purpose, including timekeeping, without first providing such individual with certain written disclosures and obtaining written consent. This lawsuit alleges that Defendants violated the BIPA by requiring current and former workers to submit their hand or finger scan between July 26, 2013 and [DATE OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL] without first providing the requisite disclosures or obtaining the requisite consent. Defendants contest these claims and deny that they violated the BIPA. WHY IS THIS A CLASS ACTION? A class action is a lawsuit in which an individual called a “Class Representative” brings a single lawsuit on behalf of other people who have similar claims. All of these people together are a “Class” or “Class Members.” Once a Class is certified, a class action Settlement finally approved by the Court resolves the issues for all Settlement Class Members, except for those who exclude themselves from the Settlement Class. WHY IS THERE A SETTLEMENT? To resolve this matter without the expense, delay, and uncertainties of litigation, the Parties have reached a Settlement, which resolves all claims against Defendants. The Settlement requires Defendants to pay money to the Settlement Class, as well as pay settlement administration expenses, attorneys’ fees and costs to Class Counsel, and an incentive award to the Class Representative, if approved by the Court. The Settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing by Defendants and does not imply that there has been, or would be, any finding that Defendants violated the law. The Court has already preliminarily approved the Settlement. Nevertheless, because the settlement of a class action determines the rights of all members of the class, the Court overseeing this lawsuit must give final approval to the Settlement before it can be effective. The Court has conditionally certified the Settlement Class for settlement purposes only, so that members of the Settlement Class can be given this Notice and the opportunity to exclude themselves from the Settlement Class, and to voice their support or opposition to final approval of the Settlement. If the Court does not give final approval to the Settlement, or if it is terminated by the Parties, the Settlement will be void, and the lawsuit will proceed as if there had been no settlement and no certification of the Settlement Class.

  • Convicted, Discriminatory, Antitrust Violator, and Suspended Vendor Lists In accordance with sections 287.133, 287.134, and 287.137, F.S., the Contractor is hereby informed of the provisions of sections 287.133(2)(a), 287.134(2)(a), and 287.137(2)(a), F.S. For purposes of this Contract, a person or affiliate who is on the Convicted Vendor List, the Discriminatory Vendor List, or the Antitrust Violator Vendor List may not perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under the Contract. The Contractor must notify the Department if it or any of its suppliers, subcontractors, or consultants have been placed on the Convicted Vendor List, the Discriminatory Vendor List, or the Antitrust Violator Vendor List during the term of the Contract. In accordance with section 287.1351, F.S., a vendor placed on the Suspended Vendor List may not enter into or renew a contract to provide any goods or services to an agency after its placement on the Suspended Vendor List. A firm or individual placed on the Suspended Vendor List pursuant to section 287.1351, F.S., the Convicted Vendor List pursuant to section 287.133, F.S., the Antitrust Violator Vendor List pursuant to section 287.137, F.S., or the Discriminatory Vendor List pursuant to section 287.134, F.S., is immediately disqualified from Contract eligibility.

  • FLORIDA CONVICTED/SUSPENDED/DISCRIMINATORY COMPLAINTS By submission of an offer, the respondent affirms that it is not currently listed in the Florida Department of Management Services Convicted/Suspended/Discriminatory Complaint Vendor List.

  • Retainage for Unacceptable Corrective Action Plan or Plan Failure If the corrective action plan is unacceptable to the Department or Customer, or implementation of the plan fails to remedy the performance deficiencies, the Department or Customer will retain ten percent (10%) of the total invoice amount. The retainage will be withheld until the Contractor resolves the performance deficiencies. If the performance deficiencies are resolved, the Contractor may invoice the Department or Customer for the retained amount. If the Contractor fails to resolve the performance deficiencies, the retained amount will be forfeited to compensate the Department or Customer for the performance deficiencies.

  • YOUR BILLING RIGHTS - KEEP THIS NOTICE FOR FUTURE USE This notice tells you about your rights and our responsibilities under the Fair Credit Billing Act.

  • Deviation from Grievance Procedure The Employer agrees that, after a grievance has been discussed at Step 2 of the grievance procedure the Employer or his representatives shall not initiate any discussion or negotiations with respect to the grievance, either directly or indirectly with the aggrieved employee without the consent of the xxxxxxx or the Union.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.