Primary Purpose Objection Notice Sample Clauses

Primary Purpose Objection Notice. Subject to Clause 8.5 provided that TfL has served a Primary Purpose Pre-Warning Notice in respect of the relevant decision in accordance with Clause 8.2, and provided that neither TfL nor the TfL Representatives have previously voted in favour of the relevant decision whether at a Board or Members‟ meeting or otherwise, where TfL (acting reasonably) considers, in relation to a decision made by the Board, that the Board would be materially damaging the economic value of JV LLP for its Members by taking that decision (having regard to the Primary Purpose), TfL shall be entitled to serve a written notice upon JV LLP before the date 15 Working Days following the relevant Board meeting at which such decision was taken, which shall:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Primary Purpose Objection Notice

  • Response to Objections Each Party retains the right to respond to any objection raised by a Participating Class Member, including the right to file responsive documents in Court no later than five court days prior to the Final Approval Hearing, or as otherwise ordered or accepted by the Court.

  • CAFA Notice Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1715, not later than ten (10) days after the Agreement is filed with the Court, the Settlement Administrator shall cause to be served upon the Attorneys General of each U.S. State in which Settlement Class members reside, the Attorney General of the United States, and other required government officials, notice of the proposed settlement as required by law, subject to Paragraph 5.1 below.

  • Class Notice The Settling Parties have presented to the Court proposed forms of Settlement Notice, which are appended hereto as Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4, respectively.

  • Required Notice The Company will advise the appropriate committee or committees as soon as possible, and in any case not less than one hundred and eighty (180) days before the introduction thereof, of mechanization, technological changes and/or automation which the Company has decided to introduce and which will result in terminations or other significant changes in the employment status of employees. The Company will advise the appropriate committee or committees as soon as possible, and in any case not less than thirty (30) days before the expected date of the change of the anticipated time sequence of final installation and production start-up and the anticipated effect on the job status of individual employees.

  • Notice to Settlement Class Members 5.1 The Parties agree that the following Notice Program provides reasonable notice to the Settlement Class.

  • Termination Notice If either Party, having become entitled to do so, decides to terminate this Agreement pursuant to the preceding Clause 8.2 (a) (i) or 8.2 (a) (ii), it shall issue Termination Notice setting out:

  • Notice of Objection Contractor may object to any action taken by NYSERDA pursuant to this Exhibit that prevents the commencement of the time in which interest will be paid by submitting a written notice of objection to NYSERDA. Such notice shall be signed and dated and concisely and clearly set forth the basis for the objection and be addressed to the Vice President, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, at the notice address set forth in Exhibit B to this Agreement. The Vice President of NYSERDA, or his or her designee, shall review the objection for purposes of affirming or modifying NYSERDA‘s action. Within fifteen (15) working days of the receipt of the objection, the Vice President, or his or her designee, shall notify the Contractor either that NYSERDA‘s action is affirmed or that it is modified or that, due to the complexity of the issue, additional time is needed to conduct the review; provided, however, in no event shall the extended review period exceed thirty (30) working days.

  • Objection Right for New Sub-processors Client may reasonably object to Data Processor’s use of a new Sub-processor for reasons related to the GDPR by notifying Data Processor promptly in writing within three (3) business days after receipt of Data Processor’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2 and such written objection shall include the reasons related to the GDPR for objecting to Data Processor’s use of such new Sub-processor. Failure to object to such new Sub-processor in writing within three (3) business days following Data Processor’s notice shall be deemed as acceptance of the new Sub-Processor. In the event Client reasonably objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentences, Data Processor will use reasonable efforts to make available to Client a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Client’s use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening the Client. If Data Processor is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Client may, as a sole remedy, terminate the applicable Agreement and this DPA with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Data Processor without the use of the objected- to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Data Processor provided that all amounts due under the Agreement before the termination date with respect to the Processing at issue shall be duly paid to Data Processor. Until a decision is made regarding the new Sub-processor, Data Processor may temporarily suspend the Processing of the affected Personal Data. Client will have no further claims against Data Processor due to the termination of the Agreement (including, without limitation, requesting refunds) and/or the DPA in the situation described in this paragraph.

  • Technical Objections No grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in the processing of the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitrator shall have the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of the grievance in order to determine the real matter in dispute.

  • Addressing Objections Raised During Public Comment Period The Parties agree that the procedure contemplated for public review of this Stipulated Order and the Regional Water Board’s or its delegate’s adoption of this Stipulated Order is lawful and adequate. The Parties understand that the Regional Water Board or its delegate has the authority to require a public hearing on this Stipulated Order. If procedural objections are raised or the Regional Water Board requires a public hearing prior to the Stipulated Order becoming effective, the Parties agree to meet and confer concerning any such objections, and may agree to revise or adjust the procedure and/or this Stipulated Order as necessary or advisable under the circumstances.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.