Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Client may reasonably object to Data Processor’s use of a new Sub-processor for reasons related to the GDPR by notifying Data Processor promptly in writing within three (3) business days after receipt of Data Processor’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2 and such written objection shall include the reasons related to the GDPR for objecting to Data Processor’s use of such new Sub-processor. Failure to object to such new Sub-processor in writing within three (3) business days following Data Processor’s notice shall be deemed as acceptance of the new Sub-Processor. In the event Client reasonably objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentences, Data Processor will use reasonable efforts to make available to Client a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Client’s use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening the Client. If Data Processor is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Client may, as a sole remedy, terminate the applicable Agreement and this DPA with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Data Processor without the use of the objected- to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Data Processor provided that all amounts due under the Agreement before the termination date with respect to the Processing at issue shall be duly paid to Data Processor. Until a decision is made regarding the new Sub-processor, Data Processor may temporarily suspend the Processing of the affected Personal Data. Client will have no further claims against Data Processor due to the termination of the Agreement (including, without limitation, requesting refunds) and/or the DPA in the situation described in this paragraph.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. You may object to Our use of a new Sub-processor by notifying Us in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of information of Our intended changes concerning the addition of a new Sub-processor. In the event You object to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, We will use reasonable efforts to make available to You a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Your configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening You. If We are unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed sixty (60) days, You may terminate the Agreement with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Us without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Us. We will refund You any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Agreement following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on You.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Customer may object to AudioCodes use of a new Sub-processor by notifying AudioCodes promptly in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of AudioCodes notice in writing. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub- processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, AudioCodes will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub- processor without unreasonably burdening the Customer. If AudioCodes is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Customer may terminate the applicable purchase order with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by AudioCodes without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to AudioCodes. AudioCodes will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such purchase order following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Client may reasonably object to Firebolt’s use of a new Sub-processor for reasons related to the GDPR by notifying Firebolt promptly in writing within three (3) business days after receipt of Firebolt’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.1.2 and such written objection shall include the reasons related to the GDPR for objecting to Firebolt’s use of such new Sub-processor. Failure to object to such new Sub-processor in writing within three (3) business days following Firebolt’s notice shall be deemed as acceptance of the new Sub-Processor. In the event Client reasonably objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentences, Firebolt will use reasonable efforts to make available to Client a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Client’s use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening the Client. If Firebolt is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Client may, as a sole remedy, terminate the applicable Agreement and this DPA with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Firebolt without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Firebolt provided that all amounts due under the Agreement before the termination date with respect to the Processing at issue shall be duly paid to Firebolt. Until a decision is made regarding the new Sub-processor, Firebolt may temporarily suspend the Processing of the affected Personal Data. Client will have no further claims against Firebolt due to the termination of the Agreement (including, without limitation, requesting refunds) and/or the DPA in the situation described in this paragraph.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Customer may reasonably object to Red Guava’s use of a new Sub-processor (e.g., if making Customer Data available to the Sub-processor may violate applicable Data Protection Law or weaken the protections for such Customer Data) by notifying Red Guava promptly via email to xxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx within ten (10) business days after receipt of Red Guava’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 4.2. Such notice shall explain the reasonable grounds for the objection. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, Red Guava will use commercially reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Customer Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Red Guava is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, either party may terminate without penalty the applicable Agreement with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Red Guava without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Red Guava. Red Guava will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Agreement following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Customer may reasonably object to Data Processor’s use of a new Sub-processor for reasons related to the GDPR by notifying Data Processor promptly in writing within three
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Client may reasonably object to Securiti’s use of a new Sub-processor for reasons related to the GDPR by notifying Securiti promptly in writing within three (3) business days after receipt of Securiti’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2 and such written objection shall include the reasons related to the GDPR for objecting to Securiti’s use of such new Sub-processor. Failure to object to such new Sub-processor in writing within three
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Customer may object to nShift’s use of a new Sub- processor by notifying nShift promptly in writing within thirty (30) days after receipt of nShift’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub- processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, nShift will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub- processor without unreasonably burdening the Customer. If nShift is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Customer may terminate the applicable Services which cannot be provided by nShift without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to nShift. nShift will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. If Customer has a reasonable basis to object to Salesloft’s use of a new Sub-processor, Customer shall notify Salesloft in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of Salesloft’s notice of a new Sub-processor(s). In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-processor(s) and that objection is not unreasonable, Salesloft will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the affected Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the affected Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Salesloft is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed ninety (90) days, Customer may terminate the applicable Order Form(s) in respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Salesloft without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor, by providing written notice to Salesloft. If no objection is received during the applicable timeframe, Salesloft will deem Customer to have authorized the new Sub-processor.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Customer may object to FF’s use of a new Sub-processor by notifying FF in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of an Updated Sub-processor List. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, FF will use commercially reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub- processor without unreasonably burdening the Customer. If FF is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Customer may terminate the applicable Order Form(s) with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by FF without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor, by providing written notice to FF. FF will refund to Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Order Form(s) following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
