Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Client may reasonably object to Data Processor’s use of a new Sub-processor for reasons related to the GDPR by notifying Data Processor promptly in writing within three (3) business days after receipt of Data Processor’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2 and such written objection shall include the reasons related to the GDPR for objecting to Data Processor’s use of such new Sub-processor. Failure to object to such new Sub-processor in writing within three (3) business days following Data Processor’s notice shall be deemed as acceptance of the new Sub-Processor. In the event Client reasonably objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentences, Data Processor will use reasonable efforts to make available to Client a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Client’s use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening the Client. If Data Processor is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Client may, as a sole remedy, terminate the applicable Agreement and this DPA with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Data Processor without the use of the objected- to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Data Processor provided that all amounts due under the Agreement before the termination date with respect to the Processing at issue shall be duly paid to Data Processor. Until a decision is made regarding the new Sub-processor, Data Processor may temporarily suspend the Processing of the affected Personal Data. Client will have no further claims against Data Processor due to the termination of the Agreement (including, without limitation, requesting refunds) and/or the DPA in the situation described in this paragraph.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. You may object to Our use of a new Sub-processor by notifying Us in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of information of Our intended changes concerning the addition of a new Sub-processor. In the event You object to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, We will use reasonable efforts to make available to You a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Your configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening You. If We are unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed sixty (60) days, You may terminate the Agreement with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Us without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Us. We will refund You any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Agreement following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on You.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Customer may object to AudioCodes use of a new Sub-processor by notifying AudioCodes promptly in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of AudioCodes notice in writing. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub- processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, AudioCodes will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub- processor without unreasonably burdening the Customer. If AudioCodes is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Customer may terminate the applicable purchase order with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by AudioCodes without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to AudioCodes. AudioCodes will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such purchase order following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Provider shall give Client prior written notice of the appointment of any new Sub-processor, including full details of the Processing to be undertaken by the Sub-processor. If, within 14 days of receipt of that notice, Client notifies Provider in writing of any objections (on reasonable grounds) to the proposed appointment, then
(i) Provider shall work with Client in good faith to make available a commercially reasonable change in the provision of the Services which avoids the use of that proposed Sub-processor; and (ii) where such a change cannot be made within 14 days from Provider's receipt of Client's notice, notwithstanding anything in the Agreement, Client may by written notice to Provider with immediate effect terminate the Agreement to the extent that it relates to the Services which require the use of the proposed Sub-processor.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Client may reasonably object to Firebolt’s use of a new Sub-processor for reasons related to the GDPR by notifying Firebolt promptly in writing within three (3) business days after receipt of Firebolt’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.1.2 and such written objection shall include the reasons related to the GDPR for objecting to Firebolt’s use of such new Sub-processor. Failure to object to such new Sub-processor in writing within three (3) business days following Firebolt’s notice shall be deemed as acceptance of the new Sub-Processor. In the event Client reasonably objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentences, Firebolt will use reasonable efforts to make available to Client a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Client’s use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening the Client. If Firebolt is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Client may, as a sole remedy, terminate the applicable Agreement and this DPA with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Firebolt without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Firebolt provided that all amounts due under the Agreement before the termination date with respect to the Processing at issue shall be duly paid to Firebolt. Until a decision is made regarding the new Sub-processor, Firebolt may temporarily suspend the Processing of the affected Personal Data. Client will have no further claims against Firebolt due to the termination of the Agreement (including, without limitation, requesting refunds) and/or the DPA in the situation described in this paragraph.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Customer may reasonably object to Red Guava’s use of a new Sub-processor (e.g., if making Customer Data available to the Sub-processor may violate applicable Data Protection Law or weaken the protections for such Customer Data) by notifying Red Guava promptly via email to xxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx within ten (10) business days after receipt of Red Guava’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 4.2. Such notice shall explain the reasonable grounds for the objection. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, Red Guava will use commercially reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Customer Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Red Guava is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, either party may terminate without penalty the applicable Agreement with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Red Guava without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Red Guava. Red Guava will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Agreement following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Customer may reasonably object to Data Processor’s use of a new Sub-processor for reasons related to the GDPR by notifying Data Processor promptly in writing within three
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. If Reseller has a reasonable basis to object to Salesforce’s use of a new Sub-processor, Reseller shall notify Salesforce promptly in writing within 10 business days after receipt of Salesforce’s notice. In the event Reseller objects to a new Sub-processor(s) and that objection is not unreasonable Salesforce will use reasonable efforts to make available to Reseller a change in the affected Resold Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change Reseller’s configuration or use of the affected Resold Services to avoid processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub processor without unreasonably burdening Reseller. If Salesforce is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed sixty (60) days, Reseller may terminate the applicable Service Order(s) in respect only to those Resold Services which cannot be provided by Salesforce without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor, by providing written notice to Reseller. Reseller shall receive a refund of any prepaid fees for the period following the effective date of termination in respect of such terminated Resold Services.
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. Client may reasonably object to Securiti’s use of a new Sub-processor for reasons related to the GDPR by notifying Securiti promptly in writing within three (3) business days after receipt of Securiti’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2 and such written objection shall include the reasons related to the GDPR for objecting to Securiti’s use of such new Sub-processor. Failure to object to such new Sub-processor in writing within three
Objection Right for New Sub-processors. If Customer has a reasonable basis to object to Salesloft’s use of a new Sub-processor, Customer shall notify Salesloft in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of Salesloft’s notice of a new Sub-processor(s). In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-processor(s) and that objection is not unreasonable, Salesloft will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the affected Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the affected Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Salesloft is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed ninety (90) days, Customer may terminate the applicable Order Form(s) in respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Salesloft without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor, by providing written notice to Salesloft. If no objection is received during the applicable timeframe, Salesloft will deem Customer to have authorized the new Sub-processor.
