Processing & Balancing Sample Clauses

Processing & Balancing. The ICS will import and combine transactions obtained from the CGS. The ICS will generate a report based on the total number of transactions for the current draw period. The report values and total values shall be manually compared to a similar report generated by the CGS. When the reports from the two systems match, the transactions are considered to be in balance. By January 1, 2005, a MUSL approved cryptographic hash function shall be applied to the entire set of transactions stored via the ICS for a specific draw to create a message digest or hash. The same cryptographic hash function shall be re-applied to the entire set of transactions after the creation of a winner by tier report immediately following a drawing. The ICS Operator and MUSL auditor shall both manually and electronically compare the pre-draw hash to the post-draw hash to verify the integrity of the transaction file or database before a winner determination report is released. In the event the hash values do not match, a third hash shall be created and compared to the pre-draw hash. If the third hash does not match the pre-draw hash, lottery security shall be notified and the transaction data must be checked for any evidence of tampering through an investigative process likely involving ICS vendor personnel, Lottery IT personnel, and Lottery Security.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Processing & Balancing

  • Sub-processing 1. The data importer shall not subcontract any of its processing operations performed on behalf of the data exporter under the Clauses without the prior written consent of the data exporter. Where the data importer subcontracts its obligations under the Clauses, with the consent of the data exporter, it shall do so only by way of a written agreement with the sub-processor which imposes the same obligations on the sub-processor as are imposed on the data importer under the Clauses. Where the sub-processor fails to fulfil its data protection obligations under such written agreement the data importer shall remain fully liable to the data exporter for the performance of the sub-processor’s obligations under such agreement.

  • Processing Costs In addition to the Purchase Price, Buyer shall pay Processing Costs in the amount of $900.00, to be paid to Seller in cash or other readily available funds at closing. The Processing Costs are owed in addition to the Purchase Price and shall not be considered part of the Purchase Price.

  • Processing operations The personal data transferred will be subject to the following basic processing activities:

  • Subprocessing 1. The data importer shall not subcontract any of its processing operations performed on behalf of the data exporter under the Clauses without the prior written consent of the data exporter. Where the data importer subcontracts its obligations under the Clauses, with the consent of the data exporter, it shall do so only by way of a written agreement with the subprocessor which imposes the same obligations on the subprocessor as are imposed on the data importer under the Clauses. Where the subprocessor fails to fulfil its data protection obligations under such written agreement the data importer shall remain fully liable to the data exporter for the performance of the subprocessor's obligations under such agreement.

  • Processing Fees The Borrower acknowledges that processing fee as mentioned in the Schedule hereto has been paid by the Borrower.

  • OGS Centralized Contract Terms and Conditions have been renumbered as depicted in the following chart: Current Amended Section Title 4.25 4.26 Severability 4.26 4.27 Entire Agreement

  • Balancing Full load hours for combined assignments other than those specified above shall be determined by the following formula: Hours of assignment, Type 1 + Hours of assignment, Type 2 + Hours of assignment, Type 3 = 1 Full load for assignment Full load for assignment Full load for assignment Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Underload shall be balanced within the following three (3) regular semesters if possible. The faculty member may, at the member’s option, use load from summer sessions to balance an underload. To balance the underload, a unit member may be assigned to no more than two colleges, unless the unit member agrees to other arrangements. The maximum required assignment shall be 1.25 FTE per semester until the underload is eliminated.

  • Interconnection Customer Payments Not Taxable The Parties intend that all payments or property transfers made by the Interconnection Customer to the Participating TO for the installation of the Participating TO's Interconnection Facilities and the Network Upgrades shall be non-taxable, either as contributions to capital, or as a refundable advance, in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and any applicable state income tax laws and shall not be taxable as contributions in aid of construction or otherwise under the Internal Revenue Code and any applicable state income tax laws.

  • OGS Centralized Contract Modifications OGS, an Authorized User, or the Contractor may suggest modifications to the Centralized Contract or its Appendices. Except as specifically provided herein, modifications to the terms and conditions set forth herein may only be made with mutual written agreement of the Parties. Modifications may take the form of an update or an amendment. “

  • Interconnection Points 8.5.1 The IP of a Party (“Receiving Party”) for Measured Internet Traffic delivered to the Receiving Party by the other Party shall be the same as the IP of the Receiving Party for Reciprocal Compensation Traffic under Section 7.1 above.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.