Common use of Proposed Contractor Selection Review Clause in Contracts

Proposed Contractor Selection Review. Any proposer that has timely submitted a notice of its intent to request a Proposed Contractor Selection Review as described in Paragraph 8.7.2 (Proposed Contractor Selection Review) may submit a written request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, in the manner and timeframe as shall be specified by the Department. A request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review may, in the Department's sole discretion, be denied if the request does not satisfy all of the following criteria: 1. The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is a proposer; 2. The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is submitted timely (i.e., by the date and time specified by the Department); 3. The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection Review asserts in appropriate detail with factual reasons one or more of the following grounds for review: a. The Department materially failed to follow procedures specified in its solicitation document. This includes: i. Failure to correctly apply the standards for reviewing the proposal format requirements. ii. Failure to correctly apply the standards, and/or follow the prescribed methods, for evaluating the proposals as specified in the solicitation document. iii. Use of evaluation criteria that were different from the evaluation criteria disclosed in the solicitation document. b. The Department made identifiable mathematical or other errors in evaluating proposals, resulting in the proposer receiving an incorrect score and not being selected as the recommended contractor. c. A member of the Evaluation Committee demonstrated bias in the conduct of the evaluation. d. Another basis for review as provided by state or federal law; and 4. The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review sets forth sufficient detail to demonstrate that, but for the Department's alleged failure, the proposer would have been the lowest cost, responsive and responsible bid or the highest-scored proposal, as the case may be. Upon completing the Proposed Contractor Selection Review, the Department representative shall issue a written decision to the proposer within a reasonable time following receipt of the request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, and always before the date the contract award recommendation is to be heard by the Board. The written decision shall additionally instruct the proposer of the manner and timeframe for requesting a County Independent Review. (See Paragraph 8.8 (County Independent Review Process) below).

Proposed Contractor Selection Review. Any proposer Bidder that has timely submitted a notice of its intent to request a Proposed Contractor Selection Review as described in this Paragraph 8.7.2 (Proposed Contractor Selection Review) may submit a written request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, in the manner and timeframe as shall will be specified by the Departmentdepartment. A request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review may, in the Department's sole discretion, be denied if the request does not satisfy all of the following criteria: 1. The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is a proposer; 2. 9.3.1 The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is submitted timely (i.e., by the date and time specified by the Departmentdepartment); 3. 9.3.2 The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection Review asserts in appropriate detail with factual reasons one or more of the following grounds for review: a. 9.3.2.1 The Department materially failed to follow procedures specified in its solicitation document. This includes: i. 1) Failure to correctly apply the standards for reviewing the proposal bid format requirements. ii. 2) Failure to correctly apply the standards, and/or follow the prescribed methods, for evaluating the proposals bids as specified in the solicitation document. iii. 3) Use of evaluation criteria that were different from the evaluation criteria disclosed in the solicitation document. b. 9.3.2.2 The Department made identifiable mathematical or other errors in evaluating proposalsbids, resulting in the proposer Bidder receiving an incorrect score and not being selected as the recommended contractorContractor. c. A member of the Evaluation Committee demonstrated bias in the conduct of the evaluation. d. 9.3.2.3 Another basis for review as provided by state State or federal law; and 4. 9.3.3 The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review sets forth sufficient detail to demonstrate that, but for the Department's alleged failure, the proposer Bidder would have been the lowest cost, responsive and responsible bid or the highest-scored proposalbid, as the case may be. Upon completing the Proposed Contractor Selection Review, the Department department representative shall will issue a written decision to the proposer Bidder within a reasonable time following receipt of the request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, and always before the date the contract Work Order award recommendation is to be heard by the Board. The written decision shall will additionally instruct the proposer Bidder of the manner and timeframe for requesting a County Independent Review. (See Review see Paragraph 8.8 (County Independent Review Process) 9.4 below).

Proposed Contractor Selection Review. Any proposer Bidder that has timely submitted a notice of its intent to request a Proposed Contractor Selection Review as described in this Paragraph 8.7.2 (Proposed Contractor Selection Review) may submit a written request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, in the manner and timeframe as shall will be specified by the Departmentdepartment. A request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review may, in the Departmentdepartment's sole discretion, be denied if the request does not satisfy all of the following criteria: 1. The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is a proposer; 2. 9.3.1 The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is submitted timely (i.e., by the date and time specified by the Departmentdepartment); 3. 9.3.2 The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection Review asserts in appropriate detail with factual reasons one or more of the following grounds for review: a. 9.3.2.1 The Department department materially failed to follow procedures specified in its solicitation document. This includes: i. 1) Failure to correctly apply the standards for reviewing the proposal bid format requirements. ii. 2) Failure to correctly apply the standards, and/or follow the prescribed methods, for evaluating the proposals bids as specified in the solicitation document. iii. 3) Use of evaluation criteria that were different from the evaluation criteria disclosed in the solicitation document. b. 9.3.2.2 The Department department made identifiable mathematical or other errors in evaluating proposalsbids, resulting in the proposer Bidder receiving an incorrect score and not being selected as the recommended contractor. c. A member of the Evaluation Committee demonstrated bias in the conduct of the evaluation. d. 9.3.2.3 Another basis for review as provided by state or federal law; and 4. 9.3.3 The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review sets forth sufficient detail to demonstrate that, but for the Departmentdepartment's alleged failure, the proposer Bidder would have been the lowest cost, responsive and responsible bid or the highest-scored proposalbid, as the case may be. Upon completing the Proposed Contractor Selection Review, the Department representative shall issue a written decision to the proposer within a reasonable time following receipt of the request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, and always before the date the contract award recommendation is to be heard by the Board. The written decision shall additionally instruct the proposer of the manner and timeframe for requesting a County Independent Review. (See Paragraph 8.8 (County Independent Review Process) below).

Proposed Contractor Selection Review. Any proposer Bidder that has timely submitted a notice of its intent to request a Proposed Contractor Selection Review (as described in Paragraph 8.7.2 (Proposed Contractor Selection Reviewthis Section 3.5.1) may submit a written request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, in the manner and timeframe as shall be specified by the Departmentdepartment. A request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review may, in the Departmentdepartment's sole discretion, be denied if the request does not satisfy all of the following criteria: 1. The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is a proposer; 2. The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is submitted timely (i.e., by the date and time specified by the Departmentdepartment); 32. The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection Review asserts in appropriate detail with factual reasons one or more of the following grounds for review: a. The Department materially failed to follow procedures specified in its solicitation document. This includes: i. Failure to correctly apply the standards for reviewing the proposal bid format requirements. ii. Failure to correctly apply the standards, and/or follow the prescribed methods, for evaluating the proposals bids as specified in the solicitation document. iii. Use of evaluation criteria that were different from the evaluation criteria disclosed in the solicitation document. b. The Department made identifiable mathematical or other errors in evaluating proposalsbids, resulting in the proposer Bidder receiving an incorrect score and not being selected as the recommended contractor. c. A member of the Evaluation Committee demonstrated bias in the conduct of the evaluation. d. Another basis for review as provided by state State or federal law; and 43. The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review sets forth sufficient detail to demonstrate that, but for the Department's alleged failure, the proposer Bidder would have been the lowest cost, responsive and responsible bid or the highest-scored proposalbid, as the case may be. Upon completing the Proposed Contractor Selection Review, the Department representative shall issue a written decision to the proposer Bidder within a reasonable time following receipt of the request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, and always before the date the contract award recommendation is to be heard by the Board. The written decision shall additionally instruct the proposer Bidder of the manner and timeframe for requesting a County Independent Review. Review (See Paragraph 8.8 (County Independent Review Process) see Section 3.5.2 below).