Common use of Proposed Contractor Selection Review Clause in Contracts

Proposed Contractor Selection Review. Any Bidder that has timely submitted a notice of its intent to request a Proposed Contractor Selection Review as described in this Paragraph may submit a written request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, in the manner and timeframe as will be specified by the department. A request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review may, in the department's sole discretion, be denied if the request does not satisfy all of the following criteria: 9.3.1 The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is submitted timely (i.e., by the date and time specified by the department); 9.3.2 The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection Review asserts in appropriate detail with factual reasons one or more of the following grounds for review: 9.3.2.1 The department materially failed to follow procedures specified in its solicitation document. This includes: 1) Failure to correctly apply the standards for reviewing the bid format requirements. 2) Failure to correctly apply the standards, and/or follow the prescribed methods, for evaluating the bids as specified in the solicitation document. 3) Use of evaluation criteria that were different from the evaluation criteria disclosed in the solicitation document. 9.3.2.2 The department made identifiable mathematical or other errors in evaluating bids, resulting in the Bidder receiving an incorrect score and not being selected as the recommended contractor. 9.3.2.3 Another basis for review as provided by state or federal law; and 9.3.3 The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review sets forth sufficient detail to demonstrate that, but for the department's alleged failure, the Bidder would have been the lowest cost, responsive and responsible bid or the highest-scored bid, as the case may be.

Proposed Contractor Selection Review. Any Bidder that has timely submitted a notice of its intent to request a Proposed Contractor Selection Review as described in this Paragraph may submit a written request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, in the manner and timeframe as will be specified by the department. A request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review may, in the departmentDepartment's sole discretion, be denied if the request does not satisfy all of the following criteria: 9.3.1 The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is submitted timely (i.e., by the date and time specified by the department); 9.3.2 The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection Review asserts in appropriate detail with factual reasons one or more of the following grounds for review: 9.3.2.1 The department Department materially failed to follow procedures specified in its solicitation document. This includes: 1) Failure to correctly apply the standards for reviewing the bid format requirements. 2) Failure to correctly apply the standards, and/or follow the prescribed methods, for evaluating the bids as specified in the solicitation document. 3) Use of evaluation criteria that were different from the evaluation criteria disclosed in the solicitation document. 9.3.2.2 The department Department made identifiable mathematical or other errors in evaluating bids, resulting in the Bidder receiving an incorrect score and not being selected as the recommended contractorContractor. 9.3.2.3 Another basis for review as provided by state State or federal law; and 9.3.3 The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review sets forth sufficient detail to demonstrate that, but for the departmentDepartment's alleged failure, the Bidder would have been the lowest cost, responsive and responsible bid or the highest-scored bid, as the case may be. Upon completing the Proposed Contractor Selection Review, the department representative will issue a written decision to the Bidder within a reasonable time following receipt of the request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, and always before the date the Work Order award recommendation is to be heard by the Board. The written decision will additionally instruct the Bidder of the manner and timeframe for requesting a County Independent Review see Paragraph 9.4 below.

Proposed Contractor Selection Review. Any Bidder that has timely submitted a notice of its intent to request a Proposed Contractor Selection Review (as described in this Paragraph Section 3.5.1) may submit a written request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, in the manner and timeframe as will shall be specified by the department. A request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review may, in the department's sole discretion, be denied if the request does not satisfy all of the following criteria: 9.3.1 1. The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is submitted timely (i.e., by the date and time specified by the department); 9.3.2 2. The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection Review asserts in appropriate detail with factual reasons one or more of the following grounds for review: 9.3.2.1 a. The department Department materially failed to follow procedures specified in its solicitation document. This includes: 1) i. Failure to correctly apply the standards for reviewing the bid format requirements. 2) ii. Failure to correctly apply the standards, and/or follow the prescribed methods, for evaluating the bids as specified in the solicitation document. 3) iii. Use of evaluation criteria that were different from the evaluation criteria disclosed in the solicitation document. 9.3.2.2 b. The department Department made identifiable mathematical or other errors in evaluating bids, resulting in the Bidder receiving an incorrect score and not being selected as the recommended contractor. 9.3.2.3 c. Another basis for review as provided by state State or federal law; and 9.3.3 3. The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review sets forth sufficient detail to demonstrate that, but for the departmentDepartment's alleged failure, the Bidder would have been the lowest cost, responsive and responsible bid or the highest-scored bid, as the case may be. Upon completing the Proposed Contractor Selection Review, the Department representative shall issue a written decision to the Bidder within a reasonable time following receipt of the request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, and always before the date the contract award recommendation is to be heard by the Board. The written decision shall additionally instruct the Bidder of the manner and timeframe for requesting a County Independent Review (see Section 3.5.2 below).

Proposed Contractor Selection Review. Any Bidder proposer that has timely submitted a notice of its intent to request a Proposed Contractor Selection Review as described in this Paragraph 8.7.2 (Proposed Contractor Selection Review) may submit a written request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, in the manner and timeframe as will shall be specified by the departmentDepartment. A request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review may, in the departmentDepartment's sole discretion, be denied if the request does not satisfy all of the following criteria: 9.3.1 1. The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is a proposer; 2. The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review is submitted timely (i.e., by the date and time specified by the departmentDepartment); 9.3.2 3. The person or entity requesting a Proposed Contractor Selection Review asserts in appropriate detail with factual reasons one or more of the following grounds for review: 9.3.2.1 a. The department Department materially failed to follow procedures specified in its solicitation document. This includes: 1) i. Failure to correctly apply the standards for reviewing the bid proposal format requirements. 2) ii. Failure to correctly apply the standards, and/or follow the prescribed methods, for evaluating the bids proposals as specified in the solicitation document. 3) iii. Use of evaluation criteria that were different from the evaluation criteria disclosed in the solicitation document. 9.3.2.2 b. The department Department made identifiable mathematical or other errors in evaluating bidsproposals, resulting in the Bidder proposer receiving an incorrect score and not being selected as the recommended contractor. 9.3.2.3 c. A member of the Evaluation Committee demonstrated bias in the conduct of the evaluation. d. Another basis for review as provided by state or federal law; and 9.3.3 4. The request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review sets forth sufficient detail to demonstrate that, but for the departmentDepartment's alleged failure, the Bidder proposer would have been the lowest cost, responsive and responsible bid or the highest-scored bidproposal, as the case may be. Upon completing the Proposed Contractor Selection Review, the Department representative shall issue a written decision to the proposer within a reasonable time following receipt of the request for a Proposed Contractor Selection Review, and always before the date the contract award recommendation is to be heard by the Board. The written decision shall additionally instruct the proposer of the manner and timeframe for requesting a County Independent Review. (See Paragraph 8.8 (County Independent Review Process) below).