Proposed Decision Sample Clauses

Proposed Decision. Upon completion of the hearing a written proposed decision shall be signed and filed by the hearing officer with the Board of Trustees and shall constitute his/her decision. If the case is heard by the Board of Trustees it shall render a written decision.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Proposed Decision.  For the Central MU, the AEWA EGM IWG is invited to discuss and adopt one of the outlined management alternatives (preferred trade-off between time horizon for population recovery and harvest opportunities).  For the Western and Eastern 1&2 MUs the AEWA EGM IWG is invited to adopt closed hunting season until such time as further management alternatives could be possibly outlined for consideration on the basis of strengthened datasets.
Sample 1
Proposed Decision. Accordingly, the following decision, which may be adopted by a majority of the votes cast, is proposed for adoption by the Executive Board:
Sample 1
Proposed Decision. Administrative Law Judge Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, State of California, Office of Administrative Hearings, heard this matter on December 17, 2015 in Los Angeles, California. Xxxxx Xxx, Counsel for the Department of Consumer Affairs, Bureau of Real Estate Bureau), represented Complainant. Xxxx X. Xxxx, Attorney, represented Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx-Xxxxxxx (Respondent), who was present. Evidence was received. The record was held open until January 21, 2016, pursuant to agreement by the parties, to give Respondent an opportunity to submit evidence pertaining to the ruling on her motion to terminate probation in her criminal matter (Case No. 00XX00000) before the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange. The Superior Court granted the motion on January 20, 2016. Respondent timely submitted a copy of the Minute Order, which was marked and admitted as Exhibit L. Complainant did not submit a response. The record closed and the matter submitted for decision on January 28, 2016. REDACTION OF PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION Subsequent to the hearing, personal identification numbers were redacted from Exhibit L. FACTUAL FINDINGS
Sample 1
Proposed Decision. The Parties agree to confer with each other as needed to comment on the Draft Proposed Order (DPO) in the EFSC proceeding and to identify any findings or conclusions of the DPO that are contrary to or inconsistent with the testimony of any Party. After completion of the NEPA document and a 30-day comment period, the BLM will prepare its Decision Record, which describes BLM’s decision. That decision can be appealed to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA), in the U.S. Department of the Interior
Sample 1

Related to Proposed Decision

  • The Decision If mediation fails, or is not appropriate, and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the Arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the Arbitrator’s decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the Arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case.

  • Hearing Decision The decision of the Board shall be in writing and shall contain findings of fact and the personnel action approved, if any. The findings may reiterate the language of the pleadings or simply refer to them. The decision of the Board shall be certified to the Superintendent or designee who recommended the personnel action, and he/she shall enforce and follow this decision. A copy of the decision shall be delivered to the appellant or his/her designated representative personally or by registered mail. The decision of the Board shall be final.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Arbitrator’s Decision 27.3.3.1 The arbitrator's decision and award shall be in writing and shall state concisely the reasons for the award, including the arbitrator's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs.

  • Disagreement on Decision Should the parties disagree as to the meaning of the Board's decision, either party may apply to the Chairperson of the Board of Arbitration to reconvene the Board to clarify the decision, which it shall do within five (5) days.

  • Written Decisions Decisions rendered at Level One which are unsatisfactory to the aggrieved person and all decisions rendered at Levels Two and Three of the grievance procedure shall be in writing setting forth the decision and the reasons therefore, and shall be transmitted promptly to all parties in interest and to the Association.

  • Hiring Decisions Contractor shall make the final determination of whether an Economically Disadvantaged Individual referred by the System is "qualified" for the position.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.