Protocols Review Sample Clauses

Protocols Review. If (i) Takeda desires to conduct a Takeda Study as permitted under Article 4, or any Development activity assumed by Takeda under Section 4.4, or (ii) AMAG desires to conduct an Other AMAG Study as permitted under Article 4, or Phase 4 Clinical Trials in the Licensed Territory for the purpose of obtaining Regulatory Approval for or Commercializing the Product outside the Licensed Territory, then in each case (i) and (ii) such Party shall notify the JDC at the first JDC meeting following such Party’s decision to conduct any such activities. With respect to any proposed clinical trial, the proposing Party shall provide to the JDC, as soon as available (if not available prior to such meeting), the protocol, primary and secondary endpoints, inclusion and exclusion criteria, comparators, estimated number of patients, and statistical power for such trial, and the countries in which such trial will be conducted, as well and any other material matters pertaining to such study.
View Source
Protocols Review. In general, the key establishment protocols can be classi ed into two types: key distribution protocols and key agreement protocols [5]. The key distribution protocols, sometimes called as centralized key distribution protocols, are generally based on a trusted third party (TTP). The key agreement protocols, on the other hand, do not use a TTP but rely on the group members for a general key agreement. The centralized method has the following disadvantages: (1) The TTP that generates A. Two-party Key Agreement The following notation is used throughout the paper: q order of an algebraic group G crete log-arithmetic and the DiÆe-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Decision problem. This classic DiÆe-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ protocol is vulnerable to the so called man-in-the-middle attack. Several remedy protocols were pro- posed. See [10] for a more detailed discussion.
View Source

Related to Protocols Review

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Protocols Each party hereby agrees that the inclusion of additional protocols may be required to make this Agreement specific. All such protocols shall be negotiated, determined and agreed upon by both parties hereto.

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.