Common use of Public Policy/Severability Clause in Contracts

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive following his departure from the Company’s service. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section 5 to achieve such a result, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section 5 be construed to achieve such result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section 5 shall be found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the Company, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on Executive, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section 5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section 5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive following his departure from the Company’s service's employment. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section Section 5 to achieve such a result, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section Section 5 be construed to achieve such result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section Section 5 shall be found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the Company, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on Executive, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section Section 5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section Section 5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive following his her departure from employment with PMIC and/or Encompass, as the Company’s servicecase may be. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section Section 5 to achieve such a result, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section Section 5 be construed to achieve such result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section Section 5 shall be found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the Company, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on Executive, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section Section 5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section Section 5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive following his departure from the Company’s service's employment. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section 5 to achieve such a result, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section 5 be construed to achieve such result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section 5 shall be found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the Company, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on Executive, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section 5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section 5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive Employee following his departure from the Company’s serviceEMPLOYER`s employment. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section 5 to achieve such a result, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section 5 be construed to achieve such this result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section 5 shall be is found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the CompanyEMPLOYER, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on ExecutiveEmployee, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not to be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section 5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section 5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive following his departure from employment with PMIC and/or Encompass, as the Company’s servicecase may be. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section Section 5 to achieve such a result, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section Section 5 be construed to achieve such result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section Section 5 shall be found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the Company, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on Executive, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section Section 5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section Section 5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive following his departure from the Company’s service. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section 5 Section 9.5 to achieve such a resultlimit the impact on Seller during the Restricted Period, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section 5 Section 9.5 be construed to achieve such result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section 5 Section 9.5 shall be found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the CompanyCompany or Buyer, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on Executive, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section 5 Section 9.5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section 5 Section 9.5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive following his departure from the Company’s serviceCyber-Test's employment. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section 5 to achieve such a result, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section 5 be construed to achieve such result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section 5 shall be found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the CompanyCyber-Test or its affiliates, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on Executive, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section 5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section 5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive following his departure from the Company’s 's service. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section 5 to achieve such a result, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section 5 be construed to achieve such result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section 5 shall be found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the Company, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on Executive, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section 5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section 5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive following his departure from the Company’s service. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section 5 Section 6.2 to achieve such a resultlimit the impact on each Seller during the applicable Restricted Period, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section 5 Section 6.2 be construed to achieve such result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section 5 Section 6.2 shall be found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the CompanyCompany or Buyer, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on Executive, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section 5 Section 6.2 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section 5 Section 6.2 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive EMPLOYEE following his her departure from the Company’s serviceEMPLOYER`s employment. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section 5 to achieve such a result, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section 5 be construed to achieve such this result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section 5 shall be is found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the CompanyEMPLOYER, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on ExecutiveEMPLOYEE, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not to be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section 5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section 5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive following his her departure from the Company’s service's employment. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section 5 to achieve such a result, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section 5 be construed to achieve such result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section 5 shall be found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the Company, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on Executive, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section 5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section 5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive EMPLOYEE following his departure from the Company’s serviceEMPLOYER's employment. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section 5 to achieve such a result, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section 5 be construed to achieve such this result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section 5 shall be is found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the CompanyEMPLOYER, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on ExecutiveEMPLOYEE, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not to be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section 5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section 5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive Employee following his Employee's departure from the Company’s service's employment. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section Section 5 to achieve such a result, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section Section 5 be construed to achieve such this result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section Section 5 shall be is found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the Company, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on ExecutiveEmployee, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not to be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section Section 5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section Section 5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.

Public Policy/Severability. The parties do not wish to impose any undue or unnecessary hardship upon Executive EMPLOYEE following his departure from the Company’s serviceEMPLOYER`s employment. The parties have attempted to limit the provisions of this section 5 to achieve such a result, and the parties expressly intend that all provisions of this section 5 be construed to achieve such this result. If, contrary to the effort and intent of the parties, any covenant or other obligation contained in this section 5 shall be is found not to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the CompanyEMPLOYER, to be unreasonable as to duration, scope or nature of restrictions, or to impose an undue hardship on ExecutiveEMPLOYEE, then it is the desire of the parties that such covenant or obligation not to be rendered invalid thereby, but rather that the duration, scope or nature of the restrictions be deemed reduced or modified, with retroactive effect, to render such covenant or obligation reasonable, valid and enforceable. The parties further agree that in the event a court, despite the efforts and intent of the parties, declares any portion of the covenants or obligations in this section 5 invalid, the remaining provisions of this section 5 shall nonetheless remain valid and enforceable.