Common use of Qualifications and Eligibility Clause in Contracts

Qualifications and Eligibility. A. Must have three (3) years of consecutive service as a UMBC Police Officer as of July 1st of this year in which he/she is deemed eligible for the MPO designation. B. Must maintain an “Effective” rating or the equivalent thereof in the Annual Performance evaluation in all categories. For purposes of this provision, the rating period shall be from April 1 of the current year through March 31 of the subsequent year, and thereafter. C. Must not have been on Sick Leave Certification Requirement pursuant to Article 16 (Sick Leave) during the twelve (12) months preceding the date on which the test is administered. X. Xxxx not have any finding of “guilty” rendered by a duly convened LEOBR hearing panel in any disciplinary action within the six (6) months period prior to the date on which the test is administered. If an officer is under investigation for charges which are pending before a LEOBR hearing panel based on allegations of misconduct that allegedly took place during the six (6) months period prior to the date on which the test is administered, the officer may still be eligible to take the MPO examination; provided, however, that should a LEOBR panel subsequently issue a “guilty” finding, the officer shall not be entitled to be designated as an MPO or to receive the increase accompanying such designation for a period of six (6) months following the issuance of the finding, provided that the officer meets the other eligibility requirements of this Section. If following a LEOBR hearing a finding of “not guilty” is made, the officer shall be entitled to be designated an MPO and given the accompanying rate increase, retroactive to July 1st immediately preceding the finding of the LEOBR hearing board. E. Must pass the MPO Written Examination (See Section 4 of this Article).

Qualifications and Eligibility. A. Must have three (3) years of consecutive service as a UMBC UB Police Officer as of July 1st of this the year in which he/she is deemed eligible for appointment to the MPO designation. B. Must maintain an a “EffectiveSatisfactory/Meets Expectations” rating or the equivalent thereof in the Annual Performance evaluation in all categoriescategories for the two (2) consecutive Performance Management Process (“PMP”) periods and the intervening time period thereafter immediately prior to the current consideration of the Officer’s candidacy. For purposes of this provision, the PMP rating period shall be on an annual basis from April 1 of the current year through March 31 of the subsequent year, and thereafter30. C. Must not have been on Sick Leave Certification Requirement pursuant to Article 16 14 (Sick Leave) during the twelve (12) months preceding the date on which the test is administered. X. Xxxx D. Must not have any finding of “guilty” rendered by a duly convened LEOBR hearing panel in any disciplinary action within the six twelve (612) months period prior to the date on which the test is to be administered. If an officer is under investigation for charges which are pending before a LEOBR hearing panel based on allegations of misconduct that allegedly took place during the six twelve (612) months period prior to the date on which the test is administered, the officer may still be eligible to take the MPO examination; provided, however, that should a LEOBR panel subsequently issue a “guilty” finding, the officer shall not be entitled to be designated as an MPO or to receive the increase accompanying such designation for a period of six twelve (612) months following the issuance of the finding, provided that the officer meets the other eligibility requirements of this Section. If following a LEOBR hearing a finding of “not guilty” is made, the officer shall be entitled to be designated an MPO and given the accompanying rate increase, retroactive to July 1st immediately preceding the finding of the LEOBR hearing board. E. Must pass the MPO Written Examination (See Section 4 of this Article).

Qualifications and Eligibility. ‌ A. Must have three (3) years of consecutive service as a UMBC Police Officer as of July 1st of this year in which he/she is deemed eligible for the MPO designation. B. Must maintain an “Effective” rating or the equivalent thereof in the Annual Performance evaluation in all categories. For purposes of this provision, the rating period shall be from April 1 of the current year through March 31 of the subsequent year, and thereafter. C. Must not have been on Sick Leave Certification Requirement pursuant to Article 16 (Sick Leave) during the twelve (12) months preceding the date on which the test is administered. X. Xxxx D. Must not have any finding of “guilty” rendered by a duly convened LEOBR hearing panel in any disciplinary action within the six (6) months period prior to the date on which the test is administered. If an officer is under investigation for charges which are pending before a LEOBR hearing panel based on allegations of misconduct that allegedly took place during the six (6) months period prior to the date on which the test is administered, the officer may still be eligible to take the MPO examination; provided, however, that should a LEOBR panel subsequently issue a “guilty” finding, the officer shall not be entitled to be designated as an MPO or to receive the increase accompanying such designation for a period of six (6) months following the issuance of the finding, provided that the officer meets the other eligibility requirements of this Section. If following a LEOBR hearing a finding of “not guilty” is made, the officer shall be entitled to be designated an MPO and given the accompanying rate increase, retroactive to July 1st immediately preceding the finding of the LEOBR hearing board. E. Must pass the MPO Written Examination (See Section 4 of this Article).

Qualifications and Eligibility. A. Must have three (3) years of consecutive service as a UMBC UB Police Officer as of July 1st of this the year in which he/she is deemed eligible for appointment to the MPO designation. B. Must maintain an a “EffectiveSatisfactory/Meets Expectations” rating or the equivalent thereof in the Annual Performance evaluation in all categoriescategories for the two (2) consecutive Performance Management Process (“PMP”) periods and the intervening time period thereafter immediately prior to the current consideration of the Officer’s candidacy. For purposes of this provision, the PMP rating period shall be on an annual basis from April 1 of the current year through March 31 of the subsequent year, and thereafter30. C. Must not have been on Sick Leave Certification Requirement pursuant to Article 16 14 (Sick Leave) during the twelve (12) months preceding the date on which the test is administered. X. Xxxx not have any finding of “guilty” rendered by a duly convened LEOBR hearing panel in any disciplinary action within the six twelve (612) months period prior to the date on which the test is to be administered. If an officer is under investigation for charges which are pending before a LEOBR hearing panel based on allegations of misconduct that allegedly took place during the six twelve (612) months period prior to the date on which the test is administered, the officer may still be eligible to take the MPO examination; provided, however, that should a LEOBR panel subsequently issue a “guilty” finding, the officer shall not be entitled to be designated as an MPO or to receive the increase accompanying such designation for a period of six twelve (612) months following the issuance of the finding, provided that the officer meets the other eligibility requirements of this Section. If following a LEOBR hearing a finding of “not guilty” is made, the officer shall be entitled to be designated an MPO and given the accompanying rate increase, retroactive to July 1st immediately preceding the finding of the LEOBR hearing board. E. Must pass the MPO Written Examination (See Section 4 of this Article).

Qualifications and Eligibility. A. Must have three (3) years of consecutive service as a UMBC UB Police Officer as of July 1st 1 of this the year in which he/she is deemed eligible for appointment to the MPO designation. B. Must maintain an a “EffectiveSatisfactory/Meets Expectations” rating or the equivalent thereof in the Annual Performance evaluation in all categoriescategories for the two (2) consecutive Performance Management Process (“PMP”) periods and the intervening time period thereafter immediately prior to the current consideration of the Officer’s candidacy. For purposes of this provision, the PMP rating period shall be on an annual basis from April 1 of the current year through March 31 of the subsequent year, and thereafter30. C. Must not have been on Sick Leave Certification Requirement pursuant to Article 16 14 (Sick Leave) during the twelve (12) months preceding the date on which the test is administered. X. Xxxx D. Must not have any finding of “guilty” rendered by a duly convened LEOBR hearing panel in any disciplinary action within the six twelve (612) months month period prior to the date on which the test is to be administered. If an officer is under investigation for charges which are pending before a LEOBR hearing panel based on allegations of misconduct that allegedly took place during the six twelve (612) months month period prior to the date on which the test is administered, the officer may still be eligible to take the MPO examination; provided, however, that should a LEOBR panel subsequently issue a “guilty” finding, the officer shall not be entitled to be designated as an MPO or to receive the increase accompanying such designation for a period of six twelve (612) months following the issuance of the finding, provided that the officer meets the other eligibility requirements of this Section. If following a LEOBR hearing a finding of “not guilty” is made, the officer shall be entitled to be designated an MPO and given the accompanying rate increase, retroactive to July 1st 1 immediately preceding the finding of the LEOBR hearing board. E. Must pass the MPO Written Examination (See see Section 4 of this ArticleArticle 19).

Qualifications and Eligibility. ‌ A. Must have three (3) years of consecutive service as a UMBC Police Officer as of July 1st of this year in which he/she is deemed eligible for the MPO designation. B. Must maintain an “Effective” rating or the equivalent thereof in the Annual Performance evaluation in all categories. For purposes of this provision, the rating period shall be from April 1 of the current year through March 31 of the subsequent year, and thereafter. C. Must not have been on Sick Leave Certification Requirement pursuant to Article 16 (Sick Leave) during the twelve (12) months preceding the date on which the test is administered. X. Xxxx not have any finding of “guilty” rendered by a duly convened LEOBR hearing panel in any disciplinary action within the six (6) months period prior to the date on which the test is administered. If an officer is under investigation for charges which are pending before a LEOBR hearing panel based on allegations of misconduct that allegedly took place during the six (6) months period prior to the date on which the test is administered, the officer may still be eligible to take the MPO examination; provided, however, that should a LEOBR panel subsequently issue a “guilty” finding, the officer shall not be entitled to be designated as an MPO or to receive the increase accompanying such designation for a period of six (6) months following the issuance of the finding, provided that the officer meets the other eligibility requirements of this Section. If following a LEOBR hearing a finding of “not guilty” is made, the officer shall be entitled to be designated an MPO and given the accompanying rate increase, retroactive to July 1st immediately preceding the finding of the LEOBR hearing board. E. Must pass the MPO Written Examination (See Section 4 of this Article).