QUALITY OF THE PROCESS Sample Clauses

QUALITY OF THE PROCESS. RESPONSIBILITIES The Staff Development Team (SDT) is responsible for managing the process and for ensuring the consistency and fairness of the process as well as the accuracy of specific, as well as overall, ratings of therapists. The principal and relevant regional/district/area manager must sign all documents being submitted to the Department. Principals and the relevant regional/district/area managers must verify that the information provided is accurate. The regional/district/area manager (or his /her delegate) will review a sample of the evaluations to ensure their consistency, fairness and relevance to the school plan and other stipulations. It is only during the cyclical external evaluations by the Whole School Evaluation Team that it will be possible to validate evaluations of the sample of therapists identified for the purpose of observing therapists in practice for the external WSE. In instances where there are discrepancies or where the process has not been satisfactory, the WSE Team must make recommendations, in the WSE report, to address these shortcomings.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
QUALITY OF THE PROCESS. 7.1 The Mediator shall make reasonable efforts be- fore Mediation is initiated or at the start of the Mediation to ensure that the parties understand the Mediation process.
QUALITY OF THE PROCESS. A Mediator Shall Conduct the Mediation Fairly, Diligently, and in a Manner Consistent with the Principle of Self-Determination by the Parties. A mediator shall work to ensure a quality process and to encourage mutual respect among the parties. A quality process requires a commitment by the mediator to diligence and procedural fairness. There should be adequate opportunity for each party in the mediation to participate in the discussions. The parties decide when and under what conditions they will reach an agreement or terminate a mediation. COMMENTS: • A mediator may agree to mediate only when he or she is prepared to commit the attention essential to an effective mediation. • Mediators should only accept cases when they can satisfy the reasonable expectations of the parties concerning the timing of the process. A mediator should not allow a mediation to be unduly delayed by the parties or their representatives. • The presence or absence of persons at a mediation depends on the agreement of the parties and the mediator. The parties and mediator may agree that others may be excluded from particular sessions or from the entire mediation process. • The primary purpose of a mediator is to facilitate the parties' voluntary agreement. This role differs substantially from other professional-client relationships. Mixing the role of a mediator and the role of a professional advising a client is problematic, and mediators must strive to distinguish between the roles. A mediator should, therefore, refrain from providing professional advice. Where appropriate, a mediator should recommend that parties seek outside professional advice, or consider resolving their dispute through arbitration, counseling, neutral evaluation, or other processes. A mediator who undertakes, at the request of the parties, an additional dispute resolution role in the same matter assumes increased responsibilities and obligations that may be governed by the standards of other processes. • A mediator shall withdraw from a mediation when incapable of serving or when unable to remain impartial. • A mediator shall withdraw from a mediation or postpone a session if the mediation is being used to further illegal conduct, or if a party is unable to participate due to drug, alcohol, or other physical or mental incapacity. • Mediators should not permit their behavior in the mediation process to be guided by a desire for a high settlement rate.

Related to QUALITY OF THE PROCESS

  • Parties to the Process a) There shall be established a Central Dispute Resolution Committee (“The Committee”), which shall be composed of equal representation of up to four (4) representatives each of the employer bargaining agency and employee bargaining agency (“the central parties”), and up to three representatives of the Crown. The Committee will be co-chaired by a representative from each bargaining agency. All correspondence to the committee will be sent to both co-chairs.

  • Quality of Work Consultant agrees that all Services performed under this Agreement will conform to the specifications of the College, be free from errors, and be of professional quality according to applicable industry standards. Upon notice by the College, Consultant will promptly correct any defects without charge to the College unless the request is considered new work by both parties.

  • Quality of Services (a) The Consultant shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and the coordination of all designs, drawings, specifications, and other services furnished pursuant to this Agreement.

  • Quality of Life Improving the quality of life for Americans and others throughout the world.

  • Responsibility for Quality of Materials and Installation Contractor acknowledges that he has full, total, and complete responsibility for providing materials, labor, and all other items necessary for providing the level of quality specified in the Contract Documents. He agrees that this responsibility is indivisible, non-delegable, non- transferable, and not diminished by any inspections provided by the Design Professional or his consulting engineers, nor by any inspections provided by the Owner. In recognition of this, Contractor will prepare for submission and review by the Design Professional, a written program describing the efforts that will be taken to insure the proper quality level is achieved. The program shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a Proceed Order.

  • Quality of Materials and Workmanship Unless otherwise specified, all materials shall be new, and both workmanship and materials shall be of good quality. The Contractor shall, if required, furnish satisfactory evidence as to the kind and quality of materials and work. The burden of proof is on the Contractor.

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Duration of the Processing Personal Data will be Processed for the duration of the Agreement, subject to Section 4 of this DPA.

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.