Range of Options for Evidentiary Process Sample Clauses

Range of Options for Evidentiary Process. ‌ There are important differences in methodology in the approach to taking of evidence and the weight that each legal system gives to oral or documentary evidence. When these differing methods are applied in international arbitrations, they can have a significant influence on the outcome of an arbitration. In common law jurisdictions the emphasis is on the parties who are required to introduce all the relevant evidence in their possession associated with the issues of the dispute in the proceedings. The approach in these jurisdictions adopts procedure involving oral evidence and hearings. Civil law jurisdictions are characterized by the inquisitorial method, which focuses on the active role of the arbitrator. This approach involves the tribunal investigating the case, establishing the facts and the law while the parties and their counsel assist in this process. The parties are not required to present all the relevant evidence and may withhold documents that are not in their best interests. There is greater emphasis on written evidence and documents rather than the necessity for oral explanation of the evidence to the tribunal during the hearings. In practice, party autonomy and flexibility provides a means to adopt a procedure that is a combination of both legal systems thereby achieving a fair and efficient method for the parties in taking of evidence. The International Bar Association (IBA) Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (“IBA Evidence Rules”) can provide a means to bridge the gap between the diverse legal backgrounds and cultures in arbitration.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Range of Options for Evidentiary Process

  • BID EVALUATION AND AWARD 13.1 The electronic signature shall be considered an offer on the part of the Bidder. Such offer shall be deemed accepted upon issuance by the Owners of purchase orders, contract award notifications, or other contract documents appropriate to the work.

  • System for Award Management (XXX) XXX.gov)

  • System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.

  • 200 Domestic Preferences for Procurements As appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, the non-Federal entity should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award. For purposes of 2 CFR Part 200.322, “Produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stag through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. Moreover, for purposes of 2 CFR Part 200.322, “Manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum, plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe, aggregates such as concrete, glass, including optical fiber, and lumber. Pursuant to the above, when federal funds are expended by ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members, Vendor certifies that to the greatest extent practicable Vendor will provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). Does vendor agree? Yes

  • Modifications and Updates to the Wire Center List and Subsequent Transition Periods 2.1.4.12.1 In the event BellSouth identifies additional wire centers that meet the criteria set forth in Section 2.1.4.5, but that were not included in the Initial Wire Center List, BellSouth shall include such additional wire centers in a carrier notification letter (CNL). Each such list of additional wire centers shall be considered a “Subsequent Wire Center List”.

  • Settlement and Recovery of Funding for Prior Years (a) The HSP acknowledges that settlement and recovery of Funding can occur up to 7 years after the provision of Funding.

  • Procedure for Benefits Modifications 1. Proposals for major retirement benefit modifications will be negotiated in joint meetings with the certified employee organizations whose memberships will be directly affected. Agreements reached between Management and organizations whereby a majority of the members in LACERS are affected shall be recommended to the City Council by the CAO as affecting the membership of all employees in LACERS. Such modifications need not be included in the MOU in order to be considered appropriately negotiated.

  • Procedure for Change of Scope 16.2.1 In the event of the Authority determining that a Change of Scope is necessary, it shall issue to the Concessionaire a notice specifying in reasonable detail the works and services contemplated thereunder (the “Change of Scope Notice”).

  • CLEC to CLEC Conversions for Unbundled Loops 2.1.11.1 The CLEC to CLEC conversion process for Loops may be used by ITC^DeltaCom when converting an existing Loop from another CLEC for the same End User. The Loop type being converted must be included in ITC^DeltaCom’s Agreement before requesting a conversion.

  • Options for Documentation 6.1. We shall document and, upon request, provide such documentation of Our compliance with the obligations agreed upon in this DPA by appropriate measures.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.