BID EVALUATION AND AWARD. 13.1 The electronic signature shall be considered an offer on the part of the Bidder. Such offer shall be deemed accepted upon issuance by the Owners of purchase orders, contract award notifications, or other contract documents appropriate to the work.
13.2 No bid shall be modified or withdrawn for a period of ninety (90) calendar days after the time and date established for receiving bids, and each Bidder so agrees in submitting the bid.
13.3 In case of a discrepancy between the unit prices and their extensions, the unit prices shall govern.
13.4 The bid will be awarded to the lowest responsible, responsive Bidder whose bid will be most advantageous to the Owners, and as the Owners deem will best serve the requirements and interests of the Owners.
13.5 The Owners reserves the right to accept or reject any or all bids; to request rebids; to award bids item-by-item, with or without alternates, by groups, or "lump sum"; to waive minor irregularities in bids; such as shall best serve the requirements and interests of the Owners.
13.6 In order to determine if the Bidder has the experience, qualifications, resources and necessary attributes to provide the quality workmanship, materials and management required by the plans and specifications, the Bidder may be required to complete and submit additional information as deemed necessary by the Owners. Failure to provide the information requested to make this determination may be grounds for a declaration of non-responsive with respect to the Bidder.
13.7 The Owners reserves the right to reject irregular bids that contain unauthorized additions, conditions, alternate bids, or irregularities that make the Bid Proposal incomplete, indefinite or ambiguous.
13.8 Any governmental agency may piggyback on any contract entered into from this bid.
BID EVALUATION AND AWARD. 17.1. The responsible Bidder whose Bid meets the requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in the Contract Documents, and whose Bid price is the lowest responsive and responsible Bid price or, if the Contract Documents has so stated, the lowest responsive and responsible evaluated Bid price, shall be selected for the Contract. A Bid shall not be evaluated for any requirement or criterion that is not disclosed in the Contract Documents.
17.2. Upon determination of the apparent lowest responsive and responsible Bidder and prior to award, NYCDOT may elect to open negotiations with such Bidder in an effort to improve the Bid to the City with respect to the price only. In the event such Bidder declines to negotiate, NYCDOT may elect to either award the contract to such Bidder or may, upon written approval by the ACCO, reject all Bids in accordance with the Contract Documents. The result of negotiations, if any, shall be documented in the Recommendation for Award.
17.3. Upon the determination of the lowest responsive and responsible Bidder, a Recommendation for Award shall be approved by the ACCO and the Contract shall be awarded to that Bidder.
BID EVALUATION AND AWARD. The responsible Bidder whose Bid meets the requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in the Contract Documents, and whose Bid price is the lowest responsive and responsible Bid price or, if the Contract Documents has so stated, the lowest responsive and responsible evaluated Bid price, shall be selected for the Contract. A Bid shall not be evaluated for any requirement or criterion that is not disclosed in the Contract Documents.
BID EVALUATION AND AWARD. The Consultant shall assist the City in evaluation of bids, determining the responsiveness of bids and the preparation of documents for Award of a contract. If the lowest responsive Base Bid received exceeds the Total Allocated Funds for Construction, the City may: Approve an increase in the Project cost and award a Contract; Reject all bids and re-bid the Project within a reasonable time with no change in the Project or additional compensation to the Consultant; Direct the Consultant to revise the scope and/or quality of construction, and rebid the Project. The Consultant shall, without additional compensation, modify the Construction Documents as necessary to bring the Probable Construction Cost based on such revisions within the Total Authorized Construction Budget. The City may exercise such option where the bid price exceeds 10% of the Fixed Construction Budget provided to the Consultant and as may be modified by the City and the Consultant prior to soliciting bids. Suspend, cancel or abandon the Project.
BID EVALUATION AND AWARD. 13.1 The electronic signature shall be considered an offer on the part of the Bidder. Such offer shall be deemed accepted upon issuance by the County of purchase orders, contract award notifications, or other contract documents appropriate to the work.
13.2 No bid shall be modified or withdrawn for a period of ninety (90) calendar days after the time and date established for receiving bids, and each Bidder so agrees in submitting the bid.
13.3 In case of a discrepancy between the unit prices and their extensions, the unit prices shall govern. 13.4 The bid will be awarded to the lowest responsive, responsible Bidder whose bid will be most advantageous to the County, and as the County deems will best serve the requirements and interests of the County.
BID EVALUATION AND AWARD a. This contract shall be awarded, if at all, to the responsible bidder whose bid meets the requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in the Invitation For Bids, and whose bid price is either the lowest responsive and responsible bid price or, if the Invitation For Bids so states, the lowest responsive and responsible evaluated bid price. A bid may not be evaluated for any requirement or criterion that is not disclosed in the Invitation for Bid. For the purposes of this IFB, the award will be made to the responsive and responsible bidder that offers the lowest bid price.
b. In accordance with Section 3-02 (o)(2) of the Procurement Policy Board Rules, negotiations with the lowest bidder who is also responsive and responsible, shall be allowed to take place in those circumstances in which such negotiations result in terms which are more favorable to the City.
c. Nothing in this Section shall be deemed to permit a contract award to a bidder submitting a higher quality item than that designated in the Invitation for Bid if that bid is not also the most favorable bid.
d. In accordance with Section 3-02(p) of the Procurement Policy Board Rules, when two or more low responsive bids from responsible bidders are identical in price, meeting all the requirements and criteria set forth in the Invitation for Bids, the Agency Chief Contracting Officer shall break the tie in the following order of priority:
(i) Select a certified New York City small minority or woman-owned business entity bidder;
(ii) Select a New York City bidder;
(iii) Select a certified New York State small, minority or woman-owned business bidder;
(iv) Select a New York State bidder.
(v) Conduct a Drawing. Tie bidders shall be invited to witness the drawing. A witness shall be present to verify the drawing and shall certify the results on the bid tabulation sheet.
e. The Agency may reject a bid if the bidder is determined to be not responsive and not responsible pursuant to the Procurement Policy Board Rules. The bidder has the right to appeal a determination of non-responsiveness or non-responsibility and has the right to protest a solicitation and award, pursuant to Sections 2-07, 2-08, and 2-10 respectively, of the Procurement Policy Board Rules.
f. The Department, upon written approval by the Agency Chief Contracting Officer (“ACCO”), may reject all bids and may elect to re-solicit if in its sole opinion it shall deem it in the best interest of the City to do so. The Agency, upon written app...
BID EVALUATION AND AWARD. 1. In accordance with the New York City Charter, the Procurement Policy Board Rules ("PPB Rules") and the terms and conditions of the Invitation For Bids, the responsible Bidder whose Bid meets the requirements and objectively reasonable evaluation criteria set forth in the Invitation, and whose Bid price is the lowest responsive and responsible price or, if the Invitation so states, the lowest responsive and responsible evaluated Bid price, shall be selected for the Contract. No Bid will be evaluated for any requirement or criterion that has not been disclosed in the Invitation for Bids.
BID EVALUATION AND AWARD. 13.1 The electronic signature shall be considered an offer on the part of the Bidder. Such offer shall be deemed accepted upon issuance by the Owners of purchase orders, contract award notifications, or other contract documents appropriate to the work.
13.2 No bid shall be modified or withdrawn for a period of ninety (90) calendar days after the time and date established for receiving bids, and each Bidder so agrees in submitting the bid.
13.3 In case of a discrepancy between the unit prices and their extensions, the unit prices shall govern.
13.4 The bid will be awarded to the lowest responsible, responsive Bidder whose bid will be most advantageous to the Owners, and as the Owners deem will best serve the requirements and interests of the Owners.
13.5 The Owners reserves the right to accept or reject any or all bids; to request rebids; to award bids item-by-item, with or without alternates, by groups, or "lump sum"; to waive minor irregularities in bids; such as shall best serve the requirements and interests of the Owners.
BID EVALUATION AND AWARD. In accordance with the New York City Charter, the PPB Rules and the terms and conditions of the bid documents, this Contract shall be awarded, if at all, to the responsible Bidder whose bid meets the requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in the bid documents, and whose bid price is either the lowest responsive and responsible bid price, or, if the bid documents so state, the lowest responsive and responsible evaluated bid price. A bid may not be evaluated for any requirement or criterion that is not disclosed in the bid documents.
BID EVALUATION AND AWARD a. In accordance with the New York City Charter, the PPB Rules and the terms and conditions of this Invitation for Bids, this Contract shall be awarded, if at all, on the basis of best value as defined in the State Finance Law Section 163. State Finance Law Section 163(1)(j) defines best value as that bid or offer that optimizes quality, cost, and efficiency.
b. Accordingly, the Contract will be awarded on the basis of best value to the City, which will be determined to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, provided however, that the Mayor may, pursuant to Charter Section 313(b)(2), direct the Agency to award the Contract to other than the low bidder in the best interests of the City by determining, in writing, that another bid optimizes quality, cost and efficiency and is thus the best value to the City. An award to other than the low bidder may only be made to a bidder whose bid is within ten percent (10%) of the lowest responsive and responsible bid.
