Rational Method Local Hydrology Analysis Sample Clauses

Rational Method Local Hydrology Analysis. Consultant will utilize the existing CSDP No. 4 update hydrology for all local facilities within the City. Consultant will review and update, if necessary, the County files with the most recent City’s “ultimate” land uses. Since the CSDP No 4 hydrology only calculated flows for the 100-year storm, Consultant will have to perform calculations for the 10-year and 25-year events, for the local watersheds only. The AES Software hydrology model will be used to develop a link-node model for the critical concentration points previously identified in the mapping phase. These locations will generally follow the existing rational method boundaries, but will need to be modified based on future drainage needs (i.e. future catchbasins, or drainage laterals). Flowrates developed will be limited in minimum tributary drainage area size to the master plan or primary backbone facility systems only (i.e. flowrates will not be calculated for each individual surface inlet, unless through separate addendum). Hydrology calculations will be competed in accordance with the San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual. All areas over 640 acres will be evaluated using the Unit Hydrograph method. It is assumed that most of the hydrology (characteristics, parameters) can be estimated from the SBCFCD CSDP #4 report 100-year storm event recently updated in February 2013.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Rational Method Local Hydrology Analysis

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!