February 2013. The Panel recalled that the judicial review of a determination constitutes a separate step whose duration is not included in the time-period regulated by Article 5.10:
February 2013. [1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the The Launceston Church Grammar School (General Staff) Enterprise Agreement 1 March 2012 - 28 February 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the School Board, Launceston Church Grammar School. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
February 2013. It is alleged that the deceased died due to a collapse of the landing gear and/or other mechanical components of the Hawker Beechcraft Model 1900 C Aircraft Tail No. N 413 CM, Serial No. UC- 13. [4] On 27 February 2015, the Plaintiffs filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, U.S.A. (“the Florida Court”) against the seven Defendants. [5] On 25 May 2015, the Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint in the Florida Court (“the Florida Complaint”). [6] On 17 August 2015, the First, Second and Third Defendants (collectively the “First to Third Defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss the Florida Complaint. [7] On 24 February 2016, the Plaintiffs filed a Writ of Summons endorsed with a Statement of Claim against the First to Third Defendants in The Bahamas. This Writ of Summons was filed 4 days before the deadline to commence this action under the Limitation Act. [8] On 25 March 2016, the Florida Complaint against the First to Third Defendants were dismissed on the basis that they were not properly within the jurisdiction of the Florida Court. [9] On 12 May 2016, the Fourth, Sixth and Seventh Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Florida Complaint against them on the basis that since the First to Third Defendants are going to be tried in The Bahamas, they are also willing to be tried there since the accident occurred in The Bahamas. [10] On 19 May 2016, the Fifth Defendant followed suit and filed a Motion to Dismiss the Florida Complaint in the Florida Court. [11] On 22 February 2017, the Plaintiffs filed an Amended Generally Indorsed Writ (“the Amended Writ”) adding the Fourth to Seventh Defendants. The Amended Writ was therefore filed almost a year (359 days) after the deadline to commence this action under the Limitation Act. [12] On 23 February 2017, the Writ of Summons and the Amended Writ of Summons were purportedly served on the First Defendant. [13] On 24 February 2017, the Plaintiffs filed a Concurrent Writ of Summons and Notice of Concurrent Writ of Summons seeking an Order that it be served upon the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Defendants respectively in the USA and for leave to extend the validity of the Concurrent Writ of Summons. The Writ of Summons expired on this day. [14] On 14 March 2017, the First and Second Defendants filed a Summons seeking, among other things, leave to enter a Conditional Appearance. [15] On 28 September 2017, the First and Second Defendants were granted leave to enter a C...
February 2013. Coordinated student letter delegation to university presidents on 6 Atlanta campuses urging them to take a stance on the issue. Senate Xxxx (SB) 227 introduced that would legalize the GA Labor Commissioner unemployment benefits cuts to contracted GA school workers. Atlanta JwJ organizes on- line campaign to pressure key senators and labor movement begins lobbying. SB227 fails to cross over to the House of Representatives. SB227 resurrected and attached to HB361 in an attempt to combine two anti-worker bills. Hundreds of e-mails sent to GA senators, phone calls targeting GA senators and GA Lt. Governor. HB361 passes Senate. Key unemployment benefit portion of HB361 fails to pass House, opens space for US DoL to act. US DoL informs GA Labor commissioner that they may commence proceedings that could lead to cutting off federal UI grants to Georgia DoL programs. GA Labor Commissioner announces through AJC article he will pay $8 million back to 4,000 GA school workers and reinstate the benefits moving forward. Public forum held at Morehouse led by students. Food service workers and students share their stories. Victory is announced. “March to Defend Unemployment Benefits” from AUC campuses to US DoL office in Atlanta with broad statewide participation from diverse constituencies. The decision by the state’s elected Labor Commissioner Xxxx Xxxxxx changed over 30 years of past practice (Appendix 2). The Labor Commissioner had “re-interpreted” Unemployment Insurance (UI) rules to extend the “between and within terms denial rules” that had historically applied only to public and non-profit educational institutions to also include private employers that contracted with educational institutions (Appendix 2). For example, public school teachers in Georgia were historically not able to draw unemployment benefits during periods of school breaks while food service workers employed by a private company at Georgia schools were eligible to draw unemployment benefits during school breaks. By extending the interpretation to include “workers employed by private companies under contract with educational institutions” the Labor Commissioner had effectively cut off four thousand school workers from unemployment benefits for which they had previously been eligible (X. Xxxxxxx, 2013). The change in benefits came with little warning to school workers, many of whom were living paycheck-to-paycheck. Some school workers received documentation from their employer in ...
February 2013. The President and CEO of Vietnam Oil and Gas Group (Petrovietnam), the national oil company, Xx Xxx Xxx, and the Chief Executive Officer of Eni, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, today signed an agreement in Hanoi for the joint assessment of unconventional hydrocarbons potential of the country. The agreement follows the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between the two companies on 21 January 2013 in Rome, which provides Petrovietnam with the opportunity to expand its international activities and the opportunity for Eni to consolidate its presence in Vietnam.
February 2013. Final Technical/Activity Report (applicable for one-year projects/activities and multi-year projects/activities in their final year) is due for submission one month before the official end of the official term of the present Contract. The Final Activity Reports must be submitted as both printed and electronic copies to APN Secretariat. Financial Report is due for submission within 30 days after the end of the 1 It is crucial that all expenses necessary for the conduct of a Project/Activity are within the duration of the official Term of the Contract. Supporting documents, such as receipts, invoices, etc. of the Financial Report must not bear dates that are later than the end date of the Contract. official term of the present Contract. The Financial Reports must be submitted as both printed and electronic copies to APN Secretariat. Self-Evaluation Project Review Questionnaire (applicable for one-year projects/activities and multi-year projects/activities in their final year) is due for submission one month before the official end of the contract. The APN Secretariat will provide, in due course, detailed information as to the format and quantity for all of the above mandatory reports as relevant to the project/activity and their timelines.
February 2013. May 2014): Phase I activities will be directed towards the following outcomes: A 50% front-end engineering design (FEED) up to and including preliminary vendor quotes Identification of preliminary installation methods and identification of operating and maintenance systems suited to the site Initiation of all permitting or approval studies and illustration of a clear and realistic path to regulatory compliance and project completion including support for NEPA review Initiation of all necessary grid interconnection requirements, as well as any needed power off-take agreements. These include any applicable FERC interconnection requirements as well as any utility-specific requirements Succeeding in the DOE down-select at the end of Phase I A 100% front-end engineering design (FEED) up to and including full vendor quotes from all suppliers and independent verification of all capital, O&M and regulatory costs and proposed schedule from a DOE-approved and applicant-financed third party Selection of detailed installation methods and selection of operating and maintenance systems suited to the site Completion of Federal agency NEPA process(es) and approval of a Construction and Operations Plan (COP) or equivalent in State Waters Completion of all necessary grid interconnection requirements, as well as any needed power off- take agreements. These include any applicable FERC interconnection requirements as well as any utility-specific requirements A successful project review at the end of Phase II
February 2013. This will confirm the arrangements made with the Local Union during negotiations whereby the Company agreed to furnish the Local Union a new office, similar to the current Assembly Office located adjacent to Bay 1 north end. All windows and door windows shall be frosted / etched to reduce the visibility within the office. The office shall retain their current furniture and office equipment (e.g. telephone, computer, etc.) for the use of the Local Union and the Union Health and Safety Committee. The office is to be used for the storage of union files plus meetings of the Union Committee and with any grievors. The Local Union agrees that it will monitor the use of the Union office to ensure this privilege is not abused, and agrees to pay the cost of any long distance calls. No modification to the office will be made without prior approval of management.
February 2013. The Energy Efficient Smart School Project was initiated at Bahęelievler Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Elementary School which is the first state school to produce electricity with solar energy in Istanbul.
February 2013. Parts A and B of the Agreement must always be completed and signed by the parties. If there is external funding or if the candidate has a place of work at an external party, Part C of the Agreement is also required. Part C of the Agreement is also to be completed for PhD candidates in the Industrial PhD scheme. When a PhD candidate has funding from the Research Council of Norway, Part C is not to be used. Instead a contract will be issued by the Research Council of Norway. Any changes during the period covered by the Agreement are to be added to the document, dated and confirmed by the signatures of the parties. - Part A is to be signed by the PhD candidate, the Head of Department and the Xxxx of the faculty that is responsible for the doctoral programme. - Part B is to be signed by the PhD candidate, the Head of Department and all the appointed supervisors. - Part C is to be signed by the PhD candidate, the Xxxx and the representative of an external party. All parties are to have a signed copy of the Agreement. The faculty’s copy is to be filed in NTNU’s records system.
