RDF and OWL Sample Clauses

RDF and OWL. RDF (Resources Description Framework) attempts to address XML's xxxxx- tic limitations because XML is designed to provide an interchange format for weakly structured data by de ning the underlying data model in a schema. XML is purely syntactic / structural describes data on the object level and often encodes an application-speci c data model. It presents a simple model that can be used to represent any kind of data, in other word, a data model for meta-information. This data model consists of nodes connected by la- beled arc, where the nodes represent web resources and the arcs represent properties of these resources. It should be noted that the model is essentially a semantic network, although unlike many semantic networks, it does not provide inheritance. EDIT: The nodes/arcs model also means that RDF is inherently , however, this does not restrict expressivity of the language be- cause any n-array relation can represented as a sequence of binary relation. RDF can be change using an XML serialization syntax, as follow: <?xml version= 1.0 ?> <rdf:RDF xmlns= xxxx://xxx.x0.xxx/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# xmlns:g= xxxx://xxx.xxx/general#> <rdf:Description rdf:about= //http:xxx.xx.xx.xx/xxxxxxxxxxx > <rdf:type rdf:resources= xxxx://xxx.xxx/road#mainroad /> <g:name>X X Xxxxxxx road</g:name> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> The basic syntax consists of a rdf:Description element which contains a set of property elements. The about rdf:attribute identi es which resource is described. The property rdf:type is used to express that a resource is a member of a given class, and is equivalent to the instance-of link used in many semantic nets and frame systems. There are many variation of abbreviated in RDF syntax. To prevent accidental name of concept between di erent vocabularies, RDF uses XML namespace for each vocabulary. This approach has two disadvantage. First, it is possible to write RDF statements such that it is ambiguous as to whether certain tags are RDF or intermeshed tags from another namespace. Second, namespaces are not transitive, which means that each RDF section must explicitly specify the namespace for every schema that is reference in that section, even for schemas that were extended bay schema whose namespace has already been speci ed. RDF schema allow users to create schemas of standard classes and prop- erties using RDF. For this purpose, the speci cation de nes a number of classes and properties that have speci c semantic. A signi cant weakness of ...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
RDF and OWL. 74 4.1.3 Peer's Representation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 4.2 The Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 4.2.1 Similarity Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 4.2.1.1 Label Matching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 4.2.1.2 Internal Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.2.1.3 External Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 4.2.2 Agreement Unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 4.3 Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 4.4 Query Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 4.5 Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 4.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 5 Result of Prototype 102 5.1 Prototype . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 5.2 Experimental Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 5.2.1 Infrastructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 5.2.2 Common Ontology and Export Schema . . . . . . . . . 105 5.3 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 5.4 Result and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 5.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 6 Conclusion and Future Work 110 6.1 Research Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 6.2 Achievements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 6.3 Constribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 6.4 Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 Bibliography 115 x List of Figures
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to RDF and OWL

  • Time and One-Half Time and one-half will be paid as follows:

  • and Older Semi-private hospital insurance and extended health care benefits will be extended to active full-time nurses from the age of sixty-five (65), and up to the nurse’s seventieth (70th) birthday, on the same cost share basis as applies to those nurses under the age of sixty- five (65).

  • Survival of rights and obligations The provisions relating to Access Rights and Confidentiality, for the time period mentioned therein, as well as for Liability, Applicable law and Settlement of disputes shall survive the expiration or termination of this Consortium Agreement. Termination shall not affect any rights or obligations of a Party leaving the Consortium incurred prior to the date of termination, unless otherwise agreed between the General Assembly and the leaving Party. This includes the obligation to provide all input, deliverables and documents for the period of its participation.

  • Risk and Ownership C14.1 Subject to clause C13 above, risk in the Goods shall, without prejudice to any other rights or remedies of the Authority (including the Authority’s rights and remedies under clause C16 below) pass to the Authority when delivery is completed to the Authority’s reasonable satisfaction.

  • GOVERNING LAW AND OTHER REPRESENTATIONS: DIR Customer [ ] Unit of Texas Local Government hereby certifying that is has statutory authority to perform its duties hereunder pursuant to Chapter , Texas Code. [X] Non-Texas State agency or unit of local government of another state hereby certifying that it has statutory authority to enter in to this Interlocal Agreement and perform its duties hereunder pursuant to the Colorado Judicial Department Purchasing Fiscal Rules.

  • License and Ownership 1.1 Pursuant to the terms and conditions specified in this Agreement, Starfish hereby grants to Customer, and Customer hereby accepts from Starfish, a nontransferable, nonexclusive right and license to use the software (the “Solution”) identified in the Ordering Document during the Term (as defined in Section 2.1) for Customer’s own internal business purposes.

  • CONTRACTING AND OTHER PARTIES (Clause 42.1) Employer: The Mvula Trust Postal Address: 00 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, East London Telephone: 000 000 0000 Facsimile: 043 726 5967 Physical address: 00 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, East London Principal Agent: The Mvula Trust Postal Address: 00 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, East London Telephone: 000 000 0000 Facsimile: 043 726 5967 Physical address: 00 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, East London CONTRACT DETAILS (Clause 42.2) Clause 42.2.1 Works Description: Construction of new ablution facilities. Clause 42.2.2 Site Description: The site is the existing Qhoboshane Junior Secondary School. Clause 42.2.3 Work or Installations by Others: XXX Xxxxxx 42.2.4 This Agreement is for a State Contract :- Yes Carried to Collection R

  • Limitations on Liability of Xxxxxxx Mac and Others Neither Xxxxxxx Mac nor any of its directors, officers, employees or agents shall be under any liability to the Holders or Beneficial Owners for any action taken, or not taken, by them in good faith under this Agreement or for errors in judgment. This provision will not protect Xxxxxxx Mac or any other related person against any liability which would otherwise be imposed by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence or by reason of reckless disregard of obligations and duties under this Agreement. Xxxxxxx Mac and such related persons shall have no liability of whatever nature for special, indirect or consequential damages, lost profits or business, or any other liability or claim (other than for direct damages), even if reasonably foreseeable, or Xxxxxxx Mac has been advised of the possibility of such loss, damage, liability or claim. Xxxxxxx Mac and such related persons may rely in good faith on any document or other communication of any kind properly submitted by any person (in writing or electronically) with respect to any matter arising under this Agreement. In performing its responsibilities under this Agreement, Xxxxxxx Mac may employ agents or independent contractors. Except upon an Event of Default, Xxxxxxx Mac shall not be subject to the control of Holders in any manner in the discharge of its responsibilities pursuant to this Agreement. Xxxxxxx Mac shall be under no obligation to appear in, prosecute or defend any legal action that is not incidental to its responsibilities under this Agreement and which in its opinion may involve it in any expense or liability. However, Xxxxxxx Mac may in its discretion undertake any such legal action which it may deem necessary or desirable in the interests of the Holders. In such event, the legal expenses and costs of such action shall be expenses and costs of Xxxxxxx Mac.

  • INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT With respect to any liability, including but not limited to claims asserted or costs, losses, or payments for injury to any person or property caused or claimed to be caused by the acts or omissions of the Consultant, or Consultant's employees, agents, and officers, arising out of any services performed under this Agreement, the Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from and against all liability. Also covered is liability arising from, connected with, caused by, or claimed to be caused by the passive negligent acts or omissions of the City, its agents, officers, or employees which may be in combination with the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Consultant, its employees, agents or officers, or any third party. The Consultant's duty to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless shall not include any claims or liabilities arising from the active or sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City, its agents, officers or employees.

  • LEA and/or Subscribing LEA This agreement is intended to be provided to an Operator from a LEA. Upon receiving an executed agreement from an Operator, the LEA should fully review the agreement and if agreeable, should have an authorized LEA contact wet sign theagreement. Once signed by both the Operator and LEA, the LEA should send a copy of the signed agreement to the Operator. Article/Exhibit Box # Description Cover Page Box # 1 Official Name of LEA Cover Page Box #2 Date Signed by LEA Article 7 Boxes #11-14 LEA’s designated representative Signature Page Boxes #20-24 Authorized LEA representative’s signature Exhibit D All Applicable Boxes (Optional Exhibit): Defines deletion or return of data expectations by LEA Exhibit E All Applicable Boxes (Optional Exhibit) Only to be completed by a Subscribing LEA RECITALS

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!