RECITALS/BACKGROUND Sample Clauses

RECITALS/BACKGROUND. PHC is a non-profit community-based healthcare organization that contracts with the State of California to provide Medi-Cal services in fourteen counties in Northern California, under a County Organized Health System model.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
RECITALS/BACKGROUND. The recitals/ background as set forth above, are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.
RECITALS/BACKGROUND. (a) To date, regulatory arrangements for the registration and accreditation of Community Housing Providers have varied across the States and Territories. (b) Consistent with the reform directions outlined in the National Affordable Housing Agreement (NAHA) and Nation Building and Jobs Plan National Partnership Agreement, governments of the Commonwealth and of the States and Territories have agreed to introduce a nationally consistent regulatory system for Community Housing Providers. (c) In June 2011, the Commonwealth and State and Territory Ministers agreed in principle to draft specifications for a national regulatory system to encourage the development, viability, good governance and quality of social and affordable housing by providing for the registration of Community Housing Providers and the ongoing monitoring and regulation of registered Community Housing Providers. (d) The Parties have agreed that the National Regulatory System for Community Housing Providers should be established and should be given legal effect through the introduction of the National Law. (e) The National Law will be established under legislation of the Parliament of the Host State, with each other Participating Jurisdiction either passing legislation applying the legislation passed by the Parliament of the Host State or enacting corresponding legislation that substantially corresponds to the legislation passed by the Parliament of the Host State (except for any minor or inconsequential differences), in each case so as to establish the National Regulatory System. (f) This Agreement outlines each Party’s commitment towards achieving and maintaining the National Regulatory System.
RECITALS/BACKGROUND. 1Notwithstanding any other provision of this Memorandum, this Memorandum is not intended to create legally binding relations between the parties but rather to outline the intentions of the Authorities (which shall not be legally binding) regarding co-operation between them.
RECITALS/BACKGROUND. 1. This lawsuit arises from Plaintiffs’ allegation that part of the Underinsured Motorist (“UIM”) coverage they purchased from Allstate was illusory because each had a serious accident and Allstate subtracted the at-fault drivers’ liability coverage payments from their respective combined Uninsured (“UM”) and UIM coverage limits pursuant to the offset described in Xxxxxxx v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 1985-NMSC-073, 103 N.M. 216, 704 P.2d 1092 (the “Xxxxxxx Offset”).
RECITALS/BACKGROUND. 1. This lawsuit arises from Plaintiffs’ allegation that part of the Underinsured Motorist (“UIM”) coverage they purchased from Progressive was illusory because each had an accident and Progressive subtracted the at-fault drivers’ liability coverage payments from their respective combined Uninsured (“UM”) and UIM coverage limits pursuant to the offset described in Xxxxxxx v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 1985-NMSC-073, 103 N.M. 216, 704 P.2d 1092 (the “Xxxxxxx Offset”). 2. Xx. Xxxxxx carried $25,000 per person in UM/UIM coverage and claims that the entire amount was illusory UIM, while Xx. Xxxxxxxx carried $75,000 per person in UM/UIM coverage ($25,000 in coverage stacked for three vehicles) and claims that $25,000 of that amount was illusory UIM. Plaintiffs claim those portions of UIM coverage were illusory because each had an accident and Progressive subtracted the at-fault drivers’ $25,000 liability coverage payments from their respective UM/UIM coverage limits to pay nothing on Xx. Xxxxxx’x claim and only $50,000 on Xx. Xxxxxxxx’x claim. 3. On May 8, 2018, Plaintiffs sued Progressive in the Second Judicial District in the State of Mexico, County of Bernalillo. Progressive timely removed the case to this Court. Plaintiffs assert a variety of claims: (1) negligence, (2) violations of New Mexico’s Unfair Trade Practices Act, (3) violations of New Mexico’s Unfair Insurance Practices Act, (4) policy reformation, (5) breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, (6) unjust enrichment,

Related to RECITALS/BACKGROUND

  • RECITALS A Upon consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 25, 1997 by and among X.X. Childs Equity Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, UHS Acquisition Corp., a Minnesota corporation, and Universal Hospital Services, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the "Acquisition Agreement"), and of certain related transactions to be consummated concurrently therewith, the Stockholders (as hereinafter defined) will own (and may hereafter acquire) certain shares of Common Stock (as hereinafter defined) and certain options, warrants, securities and other rights to acquire from the Company, by exercise, conversion, exchange or otherwise, shares of Common Stock or securities convertible into Common Stock.

  • RECITALS The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein, in their entirety, by this reference.

  • RECITALS WHEREAS the Lessor is the registered owner of the Vehicle, WHEREAS, the Lessor is desirous of leasing the Vehicle to the Lessee on such terms as are set out in this Vehicle Lease Agreement (the Agreement”) and the Lessee is desirous of leasing the Vehicle from the Lessor on said terms, WHEREAS, this Agreement is a lease-only and Lessee will have no right, title, or interest in or to the Vehicle except for the use of the Vehicle as described in this Agreement, WHEREAS, this Agreement shall be treated as a true lease for federal and applicable state income tax purposes with Lessor having all benefits of ownership of the Vehicle, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows: 2.

  • Recitals; Capitalized Terms The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated by reference. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them as set forth in the Lease.

  • PRELIMINARY RECITALS Executive’s employment with the Company has terminated.

  • Recitals; Definitions The foregoing recitals, including all terms defined therein, are incorporated herein and made a part hereof. All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given such terms in the Loan Agreement.

  • Incorporation of Recitals; Definitions The recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full in the body of this Amendment. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Amendment have the respective meanings given to them in the Current Lease.

  • Recitals and Schedules References to this Agreement include the recitals and schedules which form part of this Agreement for all purposes. References in this Agreement to the Parties are references respectively to the Parties and their legal personal representatives, successors and permitted assigns.

  • Incorporation of Recitals; Defined Terms The parties hereto acknowledge that the Recitals set forth above are true and correct in all material respects. The defined terms in the Recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated into this Agreement by reference. All other capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the same meanings herein as such terms have in the Credit Agreement.

  • Recitals; Defined Terms The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. Capitalized terms used throughout this Amendment shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement, unless otherwise specifically defined herein.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!