Recommended approach for Derivation of Participant collaboration Sample Clauses

Recommended approach for Derivation of Participant collaboration. ‌ This functionality supports the user with the creation of a Participant collaboration out of a procedural model (simply called process). The approach chosen here derives an initial Participant collaboration out of a process, which can further be enhanced by a user. The data structure that should be used as well as any details on the user interface and presentation of inputs and outputs are up to the implementer. The approach poses some requirements that must be fulfilled:  The procedural model uses the requires (or one of its specialisations) relation to indicate what participant is participating.  Access to the model data about the necessary elements is available.  Further decomposition of elements is ignored. The approach for deriving the participant collaboration uses a process as an input and also the desired participant type for the collaboration. Additionally it uses a set Participants to temporarily store several participants.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Recommended approach for Derivation of Participant collaboration

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • AREAS OF COLLABORATION The School will collaborate under Xxxx Innovation Mission to establish, operate and support ATL in India within the school premises with financial support from NITI Aayog.

  • Notice for Technological Change This subclause sets out the notice provisions to be applied to terminations by the employer for reasons arising from "technology" in accordance subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a) of subclause (i)

  • Action Item Task MSU Status Comments I.1 The University will employ and empower a Clery Act compliance professional (CCP). The CCP must report to a Vice President (VP) or equivalent. The CCP must not be employed in or under the sole authority of the Office of the General Counsel (OGC). Implemented The Office of Audit, Risk and Compliance (OARC) hired a qualified candidate who began work in February 2020.

  • Emergency Action on Imports of Particular Products Where any product is being imported in such increased quantities and under such conditions as to cause, or threaten to cause:

  • Grantee’s Notification of Change of Contact Person or Key Personnel The Grantee shall notify in writing their contract manager assigned within ten days of any change to the Grantee's Contact Person or Key Personnel.

  • Additional Information for Product Development Projects Outcome of product development efforts, such copyrights and license agreements. • Units sold or projected to be sold in California and outside of California. • Total annual sales or projected annual sales (in dollars) of products developed under the Agreement. • Investment dollars/follow-on private funding as a result of Energy Commission funding. • Patent numbers and applications, along with dates and brief descriptions.  Additional Information for Product Demonstrations: • Outcome of demonstrations and status of technology. • Number of similar installations. • Jobs created/retained as a result of the Agreement.

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Consultants’ Services 1. Quality- and Cost-based Selection. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 2 below, consultants’ services shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Quality and Cost-based Selection.

  • Sole Source as Grounds for Rejection of a Change Order If a Change Order is submitted to Contractor for the purposes of adding a Bulletin to this Contract and said Bulletin designates a Sole Source from which Contractor is required to procure goods or services necessary to perform the Work, which Sole Source has not been designated previously, Contractor shall be entitled to reject the proposed Change Order if the designated Sole Source refuses to provide to Contractor the warranties, bonds, terms or schedule required under the Contract Documents, including any warranty or terms or schedule required by Bulletins referenced in the proposed Change Order. In such event, Contractor shall give written notice to the Owner rejecting the proposed Change Order and, if possible, shall accompany said written notice with a proposal from Contractor for changes or modifications to the Bulletin so as to eliminate the Sole Source designation but to achieve goods or services equal in quality or function. The Owner may then require the Design Professional to revise the subject Bulletin so as to eliminate the designation of the Sole Source by incorporation of Contractor's proposal or otherwise. Upon revision of the Bulletin by the Design Professional and approval thereof by the Owner, the Owner shall again submit to the Contractor a proposed Change Order for the purpose of adding the revised Bulletin to this Contract. If the Owner decides to retain the Sole Source in the Change Order and Contractor cannot acquire the full contractually required warranties from the Sole Source, Contractor shall be held only to the warranty terms and schedule obtainable from the Sole Source.

  • PRINCIPLES OF COLLABORATION The parties agree to adopt the following principles when carrying out the Project (Principles):

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.