Relevance of MOSAIC to SHIPLYS Sample Clauses

Relevance of MOSAIC to SHIPLYS. As one of the tasks in SHIPLYS WP5, a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) support tool to support identification of optimal solutions will be developed. The multi-criteria decision support tool will enable optimal trade-offs to be carried out by considering LCCA (Life Cycle Cost Analysis), environmental assessment and risk based criteria. The approach will enable what-if scenarios to be carried out to assess impact on user defined factors. This functionality is important for the key stakeholder – the SME shipyard – to assess the impact of decisions on other stakeholders such as classification bodies and ship owners. SHIPLYS can build on the work done on the MCDA framework developed for MOSAIC to determine optimal trade-offs to be carried out by considering LCCA (Life Cycle Cost Analysis), environmental assessment and risk based criteria [74]. FIGURE 12 shows comparisions carried out within an MCDA framework developed in MOSAIC project Figure 12: The MCDA framework to compare the use of HSLA and composites through the lifecycle perspective. Diagram adapted from: [55] It is envisaged that for each SHIPLYS Scenario, the initial steps used in the development of the MCDA framework in MOSIAC, stated below, are relevant:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Relevance of MOSAIC to SHIPLYS. As one of the tasks in SHIPLYS WP5, a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) support tool to support identification of optimal solutions will be developed. The multi-criteria decision support tool will enable optimal trade-offs to be carried out by considering LCCA (Life Cycle Cost Analysis), environmental assessment and risk based criteria. The approach will enable what-if scenarios to be carried out to assess impact on user defined factors. This functionality is important for the key stakeholder – the SME shipyard – to assess the impact of decisions on other stakeholders such as classification bodies and ship owners. SHIPLYS CAN BUILD ON THE WORK DONE ON THE MCDA FRAMEWORK DEVELOPED FOR MOSAIC TO DETERMINE OPTIMAL TRADE-OFFS TO BE CARRIED OUT BY CONSIDERING LCCA (LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS), ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND RISK BASED CRITERIA [74]. FIGURE 12 shows comparisions carried out within an MCDA framework developed in MOSAIC project Figure 12: The MCDA framework to compare the use of HSLA and composites through the lifecycle perspective. Diagram adapted from: [55] IT IS ENVISAGED THAT FOR EACH SHIPLYS SCENARIO, THE INITIAL STEPS USED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MCDA FRAMEWORK IN MOSIAC, STATED BELOW, ARE RELEVANT:

Related to Relevance of MOSAIC to SHIPLYS

  • Remedies for Non-Compliance The Recipient agrees that if FTA determines that the Recipient or a Third Party Participant receiving federal assistance under 49 U.S.C. chapter 53 is not in compliance with 49 C.F.R. part 655, the Federal Transit Administrator may bar that Recipient or Third Party Participant from receiving all or a portion of the federal transit assistance for public transportation it would otherwise receive.

  • ACCEPTANCE OF MATERIAL 12.1 All components used in the manufacture or construction of materials, supplies and equipment, and all finished materials, shall be new, the latest make/model, of the best quality, and the highest grade workmanship.

  • STATE’S ABILITY TO MODIFY SCOPE OF MASTER CONTRACT Subject to mutual agreement between the parties, Enterprise Services reserves the right to modify the goods and/or services included in this Master Contract; Provided, however, that any such modification shall be effective only upon thirty (30) days advance written notice; and Provided further, that any such modification must be within the scope of this Master Contract.

  • Compliance with Audit and Reporting Requirements; Maintenance of Records A. The Grantee shall submit to an audit of funds paid through this Grant Agreement and shall make all books, accounting records and other documents available at all reasonable times during the term of this Grant Agreement and for a period of three (3) years after final payment for inspection by the State or its authorized designee. Copies shall be furnished to the State at no cost

  • Evidence of Compliance Each Restricted Person will furnish to each Lender at such Restricted Person’s or Borrower’s expense all evidence which Administrative Agent from time to time reasonably requests in writing as to the accuracy and validity of or compliance with all representations, warranties and covenants made by any Restricted Person in the Loan Documents, the satisfaction of all conditions contained therein, and all other matters pertaining thereto.

  • Response/Compliance with Audit or Inspection Findings A. Grantee must act to ensure its and its Subcontractors’ compliance with all corrections necessary to address any finding of noncompliance with any law, regulation, audit requirement, or generally accepted accounting principle, or any other deficiency identified in any audit, review, or inspection of the Contract and the services and Deliverables provided. Any such correction will be at Grantee’s or its Subcontractor's sole expense. Whether Xxxxxxx's action corrects the noncompliance shall be solely the decision of the System Agency.

  • Penalties for non-conformity of production 9.1. The approval granted in respect of a vehicle type pursuant to this Regulation may be withdrawn if the requirements set forth above are not met.

  • EVENTS CONSTITUTING MATERIAL BREACH OF AGREEMENT The Applicant shall be in Material Breach of this Agreement if it commits one or more of the following acts or omissions (each a “Material Breach”):

  • Notification of Modifications of Licensed Materials From time to time Publisher may add, change, or modify portions of the Licensed Materials, or migrate the Licensed Materials to other formats. When such changes, modifications, or migrations occur, the Licensor shall give notice of any such changes to Licensee as soon as is practicable, but in no event less than sixty (60) days in advance of modification. Such a notice may also be given directly by the Publisher to the Licensee. If any of the changes, modifications, or migrations renders the Licensed Materials substantially less useful to the Licensee, the Participating Institutions or their Authorized Users, the Licensee may seek to terminate this Agreement for breach pursuant to the termination provisions of this Agreement in Section XI, below.

  • Updated Information Submission by Developer The updated information submission by the Developer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. Developer shall submit a completed copy of the Large Generating Facility data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the Large Facility Interconnection Procedures. It shall also include any additional information provided to Connecting Transmission Owner for the Interconnection Feasibility Study and Interconnection Facilities Study. Information in this submission shall be the most current Large Generating Facility design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with NYISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Developer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information. If the Developer’s data is different from what was originally provided to Connecting Transmission Owner and NYISO pursuant to an Interconnection Study Agreement among Connecting Transmission Owner, NYISO and Developer and this difference may be reasonably expected to affect the other Parties’ facilities or the New York State Transmission System, but does not require the submission of a new Interconnection Request, then NYISO will conduct appropriate studies to determine the impact on the New York State Transmission System based on the actual data submitted pursuant to this Article 24.3. Such studies will provide an estimate of any additional modifications to the New York State Transmission System, Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities, or System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades based on the actual data and a good faith estimate of the costs thereof. The Developer shall not begin Trial Operation until such studies are completed. The Developer shall be responsible for the cost of any modifications required by the actual data, including the cost of any required studies.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.