DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. Subcontractor will collect and maintain data and records necessary to document services, individuals served, outcomes and any other information set forth in the Scope of Work or which Rubicon or WDBCCC require to fulfill the terms of the contract between Rubicon and WDBCCC. The processes, procedures and manner of information collections and retention is outlined in Quality Assurance guidelines that will be provided
DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. A. In accordance with FERPA policies, the Community Colleges will create policies and procedures to share the number of degrees awarded and other outcomes and data with their partner Four-Year Institutions on an annual basis; and the Four- Year Institutions and Community Colleges will submit any annual reports that might be required by the NJ Presidents’ Council and/or the Secretary of Higher Education.
B. The NJ Presidents’ Council and the Secretary of Higher Education will create policies and procedures to review the effectiveness and success of the Agreement on an annual basis; and adjust the terms of the Agreement as needed.
DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. Methodology:
1. To evaluate the Ministry of Education’s processes of Standards and Evaluations, ASJ/TI, in cooperation with the Minister of Education, selected three measurement standards to evaluate: Teacher Evaluations, Evaluation of Student Academic Achievement and Days in Class.
2. ASJ/TI then met with key actors and evaluators within the Ministry of Education in order to collect documentation, analyze procedures, and offer recommendations. Teacher Performance Evaluations: Requested Documentation: Documentation Delivered Complete 46.15% Documentation Delivered Incomplete 46.15% Documentation Not Delivered 7.70% Documentation Delivered Complete 27.28% Documentation Delivered Incomplete 18.18% Documentation Not Delivered 54.54% Findings on Days of Class: Requested Documentation: Documentation Delivered Complete 0% Documentation Delivered Incomplete 0% Documentation Not Delivered 100% • ASJ-affiliate Transformemos Honduras (“Let’s Transform Honduras”) was instrumental in recording actual school days that students spent in class versus the legally-required minimum of 200 days. While Transformemos Honduras figures confirm that over the last two years, schools have met for at least 200 days (218 in 2013 and 224 in 2014), this information was not recorded or received by the Ministry of Education. o The Ministry of Education had neither protocol nor observable practice for recording students’ days in class. The average compliance and transparency score for these three selected processes is summarized in the following table. This percentage is not a qualification of the standards of Teacher or Student performance, rather a representation of the processes and transparency of their measurement. Teacher Performance Evaluations 92.30% Student Academic Achievement Evaluations 45.46% Days in Class 0% • Create and enforce a consistent method of teacher evaluations, administered through an independent entity within the Ministry of Education, and use the results as a basis for promotions. • Develop a mechanism in which everyone – authorities, parents, students, and citizens in general – has access to the results of the academic achievement evaluations. • Document days that students spend in class through the leadership of the Ministry of Education and with the oversight of civil society.
DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. Thrive will conduct research and evaluation regarding the projects funded through its home visiting program. Contractor agrees to participate in these evaluation efforts and will fulfill the data collection and reporting requirements specified in Schedule C, Data Collection and Evaluation Requirements. It will be the obligation of Thrive representatives, Contractor, and other contractors to provide protections and assurances regarding the confidentiality of data, samples of work (in any media format) and/or interview comments provided by participants. Contractor also agrees to provide Thrive with the results of any independent or self-directed evaluation or research undertaken with respect to the Project.
DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. What are we aiming to do? How will we do it? Why are we doing it? Who will do it? When will it be done? How will we check progress? What is the cost?
4.6.1 Monitor and evaluate the Closing the Gap Implementation Plan Funding to improve Indigenous identification and collection of KPI data ▪ This involves several system enhancements (the Client Management Engine, CommuniCare and Medical Director and Xxxxxxx systems , training for Indigenous identification and data collection for KPI’s in hospitals, mainstream primary care services and Aboriginal Medical Service, and population surveys using the Health Omnibus Survey which will be based on an increased sample size of Indigenous people Good quality data is vital for monitoring progress on closing the gap in Indigenous health SA Health 2009-10 ▪ Monitoring and Evaluation Framework Developed 2010-11 ▪ Ongoing Implementation 2011-12 ▪ Ongoing Implementation 2012-13 ▪ Ongoing Implementation Measurement: ▪ Monitoring and Evaluation Framework developed Benchmark: F7 ▪ Monitor progress in improving Indigenous health data 2009-10 $515 000 2010-11 $472 000 2011-12 $485 000 2012-13 $498 000 Total $1.97 million ▪ Employment of staff for a time limited period and contracting services for some activities Funding for evaluation of the total Implementation Plan Contribute SASP target T2.5 ▪ Program evaluation is critical for building knowledge about evidence based practice. Evaluation frameworks need to be developed up front so that systems are established at commencement for the collection of data. A detailed risk management plan will be developed and incorporated into project plans for each initiative. The support of the Indigenous health sector, mainstream health services, communities and State and Commonwealth Government Departments will be critical for the effective coordination of the Implementation Plan. Links to state and national workforce and training initiatives will also be critical to the achievement of the staffing resources indicated in the Implementation Plan. Coordination mechanisms have been developed both at the jurisdictional level and at the individual project level to facilitate the involvement of key stakeholders and the coordination of critical enablers throughout the implementation of the plan.
DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. Objective: To develop an understanding of the project and obtain the required information to accurately design the improvements.
DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. Objective: Collect site and facility information sufficient to analyze the existing system and prepare a comprehensive base map for design.
DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. UC Xxxxx held its first stakeholder meeting on December 3, 2019, at the Center for Healthcare Policy and Research in Sacramento, CA, led by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, MPP and Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, PhD. The UC Xxxxx evaluation team learned about the professional and personal experiences of clients who received mental health crisis triage services and from individuals who provide these services. There were 9 attendees at this stakeholder meeting including a client, client navigator, family advocate, law enforcement representative, pubic school representatives, an emergency medicine physician, representatives from NAMI, and UC Xxxxx officials. The topics discussed at this meeting – including data collection issues and proposed solutions - will be explored in more detail and integrated into the evaluation plan as the project progresses. Initial stakeholder recommendations for contextual data have been included in the quantitative analysis plan below. For a full summary of the event, see Appendix 1. In future meetings, stakeholders will provide input on the accuracy of outcome measures and the initial quantitative analysis of SB-82 program effectiveness. They will be asked to share their thoughts on what outcomes they find significant as well as good indicators of a successful mental health crisis program. Stakeholders may also provide information on databases or desired measurable outcomes of interest. No participant or individual stakeholder will be identified in documents summarizing stakeholder input.
DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. 3.1 If performance of services under this agreement includes gathering data and information, evaluating the data and information, or reporting conclusions and recommendations arising out of that collection and evaluation process, the following limitations will apply to grantee’s use of the data and information in addition to any other conditions and limitations imposed by this agreement.
DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. School staff will participate in training conducted by NM GEAR UP staff and program contractors. School staff will collect and record data for all GEAR UP contacts with students using manual and online data collection systems.
