Repair Mechanism Sample Clauses

Repair Mechanism. ‌ [ | [ ∗ | The results for assessing the performance of the repair mechanism are shown in Figure 10 and the percentages represent the number of infeasible schedules where feasibility is restored divided by the total number of infeasible schedules. For example, the repair probability of NL10K3 is 89.8%, meaning that all generated infeasible schedules with up to 8 violations (= τn = 0.75 10 ) are passed through the repair mechanism. From all those infeasible schedules, 89.8% are returned by the repair mechanism without any violation and consequently, with a restored feasibility. A first conclusion of Figure 10 is that all generated infeasible NL4 schedules with up to 3 violations can be repaired. In fact, only schedules with 2 violations can be passed to the repair mechanism since only the norepeat constraint can be violated. Those violations always come in pairs because two teams play each other in two consecutive rounds and a violation will be reported for each team. A second conclusion is the increasing performance as the number of byes rises. Since the repair mechanism uses byes to repair schedules, more byes provide more opportunities to restore the feasibility of a schedule. For large instances the difference becomes quite extensive, with 3-RTTP instances having a repair probability of over 80% and 1-RTTP instances struggling to get to 25%. The third and last conclusion is the declining performance when the size of the competition increases. First of all, the allowed number of violations is a linear function of the competition size which results in more violations that potentially have to be repaired for larger competitions. Secondly, swapping a match between 2 rounds will cause more teams and matches to be involved for larger instances and therefore reducing the probability of restoring feasibility. Feasibility Probability 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% NL4 NL6 NL8 NL10 NL12 NL14 NL16 Instance K = 1 K = 2 K = 3 Figure 10: Performance Repair Mechanism The comparison between an algorithm with and without the repair method is presented in Figure 11b. The squares and crosses represent the mean solution xxxxx after 3 runs of 30 minutes for a program with and without the repair mechanism, respectively. For all instances, except the largest one, the repair method outperforms the other. This confirms the presumption implementing a repair chain is potentially beneficial for the performance of the algorithm.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Repair Mechanism

  • Repair Testing At the time of repair of a LIS trunk group, at no additional charge, tests will be performed to ensure that the service is operational and meets the applicable technical parameters.

  • Validation Mechanism To be eligible for articulation, the student must show evidence of their CompTIA A+ certification and it must have been issued within three (3) years prior to their enrollment in the program.

  • Repair or Replacement (1) Unless a dispute resolution process has been initiated, the Insurer, instead of making payment, may repair, rebuild, or replace the insured property lost or damaged, on giving written notice of its intention to do so within thirty days after receiving the proof of loss.

  • Payment Mechanism All payments under this Agreement shall be made in United States Dollars, unless otherwise agreed, and within ten (10) days after the end of the month in which the obligation to make the payment is incurred to a bank specified by the Party to whom the payment is due.

  • REPAIRED OR REPLACED PARTS / COMPONENTS Where the Contractor is required to repair, replace or substitute Product or parts or components of the Product under the Contract, the repaired, replaced or substituted Products shall be subject to all terms and conditions for new parts and components set forth in the Contract including Warranties, as set forth in the Additional Warranties Clause herein. Replaced or repaired Product or parts and components of such Product shall be new and shall, if available, be replaced by the original manufacturer’s component or part. Remanufactured parts or components meeting new Product standards may be permitted by the Commissioner or Authorized User. Before installation, all proposed substitutes for the original manufacturer’s installed parts or components must be approved by the Authorized User. The part or component shall be equal to or of better quality than the original part or component being replaced.

  • Consultative Mechanism The parties agree that a precondition for the effective operation of the Agreement is the establishment of consultative mechanisms with the Company. To this end, a Consultative Committee, comprising of Company appointed representatives and employee elected representatives should be established and maintained. Officers of the Union shall have a standing invitation to attend any such meeting. The purpose of the Consultative Committee shall be to consult, develop, recommend and assist to implement strategies and measures designed to achieve the objectives outlined under Clause 4 of this Agreement.

  • Follow-up Testing An employee shall submit to unscheduled follow-up drug and/or alcohol testing if, within the previous 24-month period, the employee voluntarily disclosed drug or alcohol problems, entered into or completed a rehabilitation program for drug or alcohol abuse, failed or refused a preappointment drug test, or was disciplined for violating the provisions of this Agreement and Employer work rules. The Employer may require an employee who is subject to follow-up testing to submit to no more than six unscheduled drug or alcohol tests within any 12 month period.

  • RECONNECTION AFTER DISCONNECTION (a) We must request your distributor to reconnect your premises if, within 10 business days of your premises being disconnected:

  • PROCEDURE FOR TESTING A. Notification Form - Before requesting an employee to undergo drug or alcohol testing, the Employer shall provide the individual with a form on which to (1) acknowledge that the individual has seen a copy of the Employer's Drug and Alcohol Testing LOA, and (2) indicate consent to undergo the drug and alcohol testing.

  • Meter Testing Company shall provide at least twenty-four (24) hours' notice to Seller prior to any test it may perform on the revenue meters or metering equipment. Seller shall have the right to have a representative present during each such test. Seller may request, and Company shall perform, if requested, tests in addition to the every fifth-year test and Seller shall pay the cost of such tests. Company may, in its sole discretion, perform tests in addition to the fifth year test and Company shall pay the cost of such tests. If any of the revenue meters or metering equipment is found to be inaccurate at any time, as determined by testing in accordance with this Section 10.2 (Meter Testing), Company shall promptly cause such equipment to be made accurate, and the period of inaccuracy, as well as an estimate for correct meter readings, shall be determined in accordance with Section 10.3 (Corrections).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.