Restrictions Reasonable The Participant acknowledges that the restrictive covenants under this Section 9, for which the Participant received valuable consideration from the Company as provided in this Award Agreement, including, but not limited to the Company’s agreement to provide the Participant with Confidential Information regarding the Company and the Company’s business are ancillary to otherwise enforceable provisions of this Award Agreement that the consideration provided by the Company gives rise to the Company’s interest in restraining the Participant from competing and that the restrictive covenants are designed to enforce the Participant’s consideration or return promises under this Award Agreement. Additionally, the Participant acknowledges that these restrictive covenants contain limitations as to time, geographical area, and scope of activity to be restrained that are reasonable and do not impose a greater restraint than is necessary to protect the goodwill or other legitimate business interests of the Company, including, but not limited to, the Company’s need to protect its Confidential Information.
Reasonable Restrictions The Parties acknowledge that the foregoing restrictions, as well as the duration and the territorial scope thereof as set forth in this ARTICLE IV, are under all of the circumstances reasonable and necessary for the protection of the Company and its business.
Reasonable Suspicion Testing All Employees Performing Safety-Sensitive Functions
A. Reasonable suspicion testing for alcohol or controlled substances may be directed by the Employer for any employee performing safety-sensitive functions when there is reason to suspect that alcohol or controlled substance use may be adversely affecting the employee’s job performance or that the employee may present a danger to the physical safety of the employee or another.
B. Specific objective grounds must be stated in writing that support the reasonable suspicion. Examples of specific objective grounds include but are not limited to:
1. Physical symptoms consistent with alcohol and/or controlled substance use;
2. Evidence or observation of alcohol or controlled substance use, possession, sale, or delivery; or
3. The occurrence of an accident(s) where a trained manager, supervisor or lead worker suspects alcohol or other controlled substance use may have been a factor.
Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.
Servicer Shall Provide Information as Reasonably Required The Servicer shall furnish to the Trustee, during the term of this Agreement, such periodic, special, or other reports or information, whether or not provided for herein, as shall be necessary, reasonable, or appropriate in respect to the Trustee, or otherwise in respect to the purposes of this Agreement, all such reports or information to be as provided by and in accordance with such applicable instructions and directions as the Trustee may reasonably require.
Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.
SUSPENSIVE CONDITIONS 2.1 This entire AGREEMENT is subject to the registration of transfer of ownership of the PROPERTY to the EMPLOYER. In the event that the PROPERTY is not transferred within 6 (six) months from date of signing of this Agreement by the CONTRACTOR, the CONTRACTOR reserves the right to:
2.1.1 increase the CONTRACT SUM, based on the current prices for the building materials, and the CONTRACTOR shall notify the EMPLOYER in writing of such increased cost and the EMPLOYER may then, at his/her option, cancel this agreement by providing written notice of cancellation to the CONTRACTOR within 5 (five) DAYS of receiving written notice from the CONTRACTOR in respect of the increased cost. Should written notice of cancellation not be forthcoming within the aforesaid period, the CONTRACTOR and the EMPLOYER shall proceed with the AGREEMENT at the increased CONTRACT SUM and the EMPLOYER shall be obliged to pay the increase in the CONTRACT SUM to the CONTRACTOR within 21 (twenty one) DAYS of receiving written notice from the CONTRACTOR in respect of the increased cost; or
2.1.2 cancel this AGREEMENT and the parties shall have no claim of whatsoever nature against each other.
2.2 This AGREEMENT is subject further to the EMPLOYER being offered a loan to be secured by a mortgage bond over the PROPERTY and improvements in the amount reflected in Schedule B or such lesser amount as the EMPLOYER may accept, within 30 (thirty) DAYS of the date of the CONTRACTOR’s signature of this AGREEMENT, which period may be extended in the CONTRACTOR’s sole discretion. Should no amount be inserted in the relevant field in the Schedule B, then the suspensive condition contained in this clause will not apply. In the event that the suspensive condition contained in this clause is not fulfilled, this AGREEMENT will lapse and the parties shall have no claim of whatsoever nature against each other.
SUSPENSIVE CONDITION i) The contract only becomes binding and enforceable once:
a. the Parties have signed this contract and the PRODUCER has received a MEATCO confirmation letter stipulating the applicable xxxxxxxxx period and cattle quantity to be delivered to MEATCO;
b. MEATCO agrees to provide a xxxxxxxxx allocation to the PRODUCER on a first come first served basis principle, and at the sole discretion of MEATCO; and
c. the PRODUCER has provided, within 10 business days of MEATCO’s request, a guarantee or security for the payment of the maximum penalty capable of being imposed in terms of clause A. vi) above to the satisfaction of MEATCO.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS SOLICITATION All questions or concerns regarding this Invitation for Bids shall be submitted by email to the Procurement Division representative specified on the cover page of this Invitation for Bids. Consideration for modification or alteration of the documents contained in this solicitation shall be requested during the specified question specified on the cover page of this Invitation for Bids. When required the Procurement Division shall issue an addendum to the Invitation for Bids. The addendum shall be available on the aforementioned electronic portal for access by potential Bidders. Bidders are instructed not to contact the initiating division directly. No oral interpretation of this Invitation for Bids shall be considered binding. The County shall be bound by information and statements only when such statements are written and executed under the authority of the Manager, Procurement Division. This provision exists solely for the convenience and administrative efficiency of Orange County. No Bidder or other third party gains any rights by virtue of this provision or the application thereof, nor shall any Bidder or third party have any standing to sue or cause of action arising there from.
AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.
