Results on the portfolio Sample Clauses

Results on the portfolio. This APM is used in order to measure gains and losses realised and unrealised compared with the last valuation by the independent real estate expert. Its basis of calculation is as follows (using the half- year figures as at 30 June 2016 incorporated by reference in the Prospectus): Result on the portfolio 30/06/2016 30/06/2015 Gains or losses on disposals of investment properties 1.412 1.957 Change in fair value of investment properties 11.718 -8.740 Results of Affiliated Companies Accounted for under the Equity Method 311 0 Other result on the portfolio -855 -210 Result on portfolio 12.586 -6.993 Minority interests -473 -89 Result on the portfolio - group share 12.113 7.083 7.5.3 Revaluation of derivative financial instruments (IAS 39) This APM is used in order to measure non-recurring financing costs (cash or non-cash) of the company, mainly change in the fair value of hedging instruments, hedge restructuring costs and costs related to the issue of financial debt instruments accounted at fair value. Its basis of calculation is as follows (using the half-year figures as at 30 June 2016 incorporated by reference in the Prospectus): Revaluation of derivative financial instruments (IAS 39) 30/06/2016 30/06/2015 Recycling Cash Flow Hedge Change in fair value USD option -3.122 -636 -7.845 0 Others 0 -362 Authorised hedging instruments qualifying for hedge accounting -3.758 -8.207 Change in fair value IRS Change in fair value convertibles -31.946 -1.778 17.785 -8.160 Authorised hedging instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting -33.724 9.625 Total impact IAS 39 -37.482 1.418 7.5.4 EPRA related APMs The Issuer discloses various APMs which are performance indicators established by the European Public Real Estate Association (EPRA). EPRA is a forefront sector organisation whose mission is to promote, develop and represent the European public real estate sector; the Issuer has been an EPRA member for many years. EPRA performance measures aim at enhancing a consistent reporting among public real estate companies throughout Europe. The basis of calculation of the various EPRA performance indicators disclosed by the Issuer is set out in the Registration Document (pages 140 and following). The Issuer follows the "EPRA Best Practices Recommendations" when calculating these performance indicators. The EPRA performance indicators provide useful information in order to enhance the transparency, comparability and relevance of the published results of listed real estat...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Results on the portfolio

  • Test Results The employer, upon request from an employee or former employee, will provide the confidential written report issued pursuant to 4.9 of the Canadian Model in respect to that employee or former employee.

  • Termination and Results of Termination 24.1. Without prejudice to the Company’s rights under this Agreement to terminate it immediately without prior notice to the Client, each Party may terminate this Agreement by giving at least three (3) Business Days Written Notice to the other Party.

  • Expected Results VA’s agreement with DoD to provide educational assistance is a statutory requirement of Chapter 1606, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 1607, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 30, Title 38, U.S.C. and Chapter 33, Title 38, U.S.C (Post-9/11 GI Xxxx). These laws require VA to make payments to eligible veterans, service members, guard, reservist, and family members under the transfer of entitlement provisions. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 1606 is placed on the DoD. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on VA, while the responsibility of providing initial eligibility data for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on DoD. Thus, the two agencies must exchange data to ensure that VA makes payments only to those who are eligible for a program. Without an exchange of enrollment and eligibility data, VA would not be able to establish or verify applicant and recipient eligibility for the programs. Subject to the due process requirements, set forth in Article VII.B.1., 38 U.S.C. §3684A, VA may suspend, terminate, or make a final denial of any financial assistance on the basis of data produced by a computer matching program with DoD. To minimize administrative costs of implementation of the law and to maximize the service to the veteran or service member, a system of data exchanges and subsequent computer matching programs was developed. The purposes of the computer matching programs are to minimize the costs of administering the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; facilitate accurate payment to eligible veterans or service members training under the Chapter of the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; and to avoid payment to those who lose eligibility. The current automated systems, both at VA and DoD, have been developed over the last twenty-two years. The systems were specifically designed to utilize computer matching in transferring enrollment and eligibility data to facilitate accurate payments and avoid incorrect payments. The source agency, DMDC, stores eligibility data on its computer based system of record. The cost of providing this data to VA electronically are minimal when compared to the cost DMDC would incur if the data were forwarded to VA in a hard-copy manner. By comparing records electronically, VA avoids the personnel costs of inputting data manually as well as the storage costs of the DMDC documents. This results in a VA estimated annual savings of $26,724,091 to VA in mailing and data entry costs. DoD reported an estimated annual savings of $12,350,000. A cost-benefit analysis is at Attachment 1. In the 32 years since the inception of the Chapter 30 program, the cost savings of using computer matching to administer the benefit payments for these educational assistance programs have remained significant. The implementation of Chapter 33 has impacted the Chapter 30 program over the past 8 years (fiscal year 2010 through fiscal year 2017). Statistics show a decrease of 23 percent in the number of persons who ultimately use Chapter 30 from fiscal year 2015 to 2016. The number of persons who use Chapter 33 has consistently been above 700,000 in the past four years. VA foresees continued cost savings due to the number of persons eligible for the education programs.

  • Quarterly Report 5.1 Upon request, the contractor shall provide to the Purchasing Agent a quarterly report, showing all purchases made under the terms and conditions of the contract.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!