Common use of Retirement Contributions Clause in Contracts

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” ―pick up‖ the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”―PERS Litigation‖). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to the law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties Parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with in respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to the law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to the law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.or

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.this

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” ―pick up‖ the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to the law. The parties Parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”―PERS Litigation‖). Nothing in this Agreement agreement shall constitute a waiver of any partyParty’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to the law. The parties Parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement agreement shall constitute a waiver of any partyParty’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, contribution payable pursuant to lawas the law requires. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). .) Nothing in this Agreement agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). .) Nothing in this Agreement agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.PERS

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” ―pick up‖ the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to the law. The parties Parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”―PERS Litigation‖). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.this

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s party‟s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties Parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with in respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). .) Nothing in this Agreement agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s party‟s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “„pick up” up‟ the six percent (6%) employee contribution, contribution payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, constituti- onality of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters chapters 67 (HB 2003HB2003) and 68 (HB 2004HB2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s party‟s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigationlitigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the 22 six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that 23 various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of 24 various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including 25 Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in 26 this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the 27 PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to the law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s party‟s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick 8 up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties 9 acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including 10 the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 11 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 12 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s 13 rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “‘pick up” ’ the six percent (6%) employee contribution, contribution payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, constitutionality of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters chapters 67 (HB 2003HB2003) and 68 (HB 2004HB2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigationlitigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick 15 up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties 16 acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including 17 the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by 18 the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003HB2003) and 68 (HB 2004HB2004) of 19 Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver 20 of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, contribution payable pursuant to lawas the law requires. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). .) Nothing in this Agreement agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s party‟s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” ―pick up‖ the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”―PERS Litigation‖). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s party‘s rights, claims or defenses with in respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003HB2003) and 68 (HB 2004HB2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.

Retirement Contributions. On behalf of employees, the State will continue to “pick up” ―pick up‖ the six percent (6%) employee contribution, payable pursuant to law. The parties acknowledge that various challenges have been filed that contest the lawfulness, including the constitutionality, of various aspects of PERS reform legislation enacted by the 2003 Legislative Assembly, including Chapters 67 (HB 2003) and 68 (HB 2004) of Oregon Laws 2003 (“PERS Litigation”―PERS Litigation‖). Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any party’s party‘s rights, claims or defenses with respect to the PERS Litigation.