Ruling Process Control Clause Samples

Ruling Process Control. Each of Carrier and Otis hereby agrees that UTC shall have sole and exclusive control over the process of obtaining any private letter ruling (or other ruling), and that only UTC shall apply for such a private letter ruling (or other ruling). In connection with obtaining a private letter ruling pursuant to Section 7.04(b), UTC shall (i) keep the Requesting SpinCo informed in a timely manner of all material actions taken or proposed to be taken by UTC in connection therewith; (ii) (A) reasonably in advance of the submission of any related private letter ruling documents provide the Requesting SpinCo with a draft copy thereof, (B) reasonably consider the Requesting SpinCo’s comments on such draft copy, and (C) provide the Requesting SpinCo with a final copy; and (iii) UTC shall provide the Requesting SpinCo with notice reasonably in advance of, and the Requesting SpinCo shall have the right to attend, any formally scheduled meetings with the IRS (subject to the approval of the IRS) that relate to such private letter ruling. None of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇, or their respective directly or indirectly controlled Affiliates shall seek any guidance from the IRS or any other Tax Authority (whether written, verbal or otherwise) at any time concerning any Transaction that is the subject of a Tax Opinion/Ruling (including the impact of any transaction on any of the foregoing).
View SourceView Similar (11)
Ruling Process Control. SpinCo hereby agrees that XPO shall have sole and exclusive control over the process of obtaining any private letter ruling (or other ruling) and that only XPO shall apply for such a private letter ruling (or other ruling). In connection with obtaining a private letter ruling pursuant to Section 7.04(b), XPO shall (i) keep SpinCo informed in a timely manner of all material actions taken or proposed to be taken by XPO in connection therewith; (ii) (A) reasonably in advance of the submission of any related private letter ruling documents provide SpinCo with a draft copy thereof, (B) reasonably consider SpinCo’s comments on such draft copy and (C) provide SpinCo with a final copy; and (iii) provide SpinCo with notice reasonably in advance of, and SpinCo shall have the right to attend, any formally scheduled meetings with the IRS (subject to the approval of the IRS) that relate to such private letter ruling. Neither SpinCo nor any of its directly or indirectly controlled Affiliates shall seek any guidance from the IRS or any other Tax Authority (whether written, verbal or otherwise) at any time concerning any Transaction that is the subject of a Tax Opinion (including the impact of any transaction on any of the foregoing).
View SourceView Similar (7)
Ruling Process Control. In connection with obtaining a private letter ruling pursuant to Section 7.02(b), the Requesting Company (i) shall have control over the process of obtaining such private letter ruling, (ii) shall keep the Consenting Company informed in a timely manner of all material actions taken or proposed to be taken by the Requesting Company in connection therewith; (iii) (A) reasonably in advance of the submission of any related private letter ruling documents provide the Consenting Company with a draft copy thereof, (B) reasonably consider the Consenting Company’s comments on such draft copy, and (C) provide the Consenting Company with a final copy; and (iv) shall provide the Consenting Company with notice reasonably in advance of, and the Consenting Company shall have the right to attend, any formally scheduled meetings with the IRS (subject to the approval of the IRS) that relate to such private letter ruling. The Consenting Company shall execute and deliver to the Requesting Company any power of attorney or other similar document reasonably requested by the Requesting Company in connection with the process of obtaining a private letter ruling. Subject to Section 7.02(b), neither IAC, New IAC nor any of their respective directly or indirectly controlled Affiliates shall seek any guidance from the IRS or any other Tax Authority (whether written, verbal or otherwise) at any time concerning any Transaction that is the subject of a Tax Opinion (including the impact of any transaction on any of the foregoing) without the other Company’s prior written consent.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Ruling Process Control. SpinCo agrees that Parent shall have sole and exclusive control over the process of obtaining any private letter ruling (or other ruling) and that only Parent shall apply for such a private letter ruling (or other ruling). SpinCo shall not, nor shall SpinCo permit any of its Affiliates to, seek any guidance from the IRS or any other Tax Authority (whether written, verbal, or otherwise) at any time concerning any Transaction that is the subject of a Tax Opinion/Ruling (including the impact of any other action or transaction on any of the foregoing).
View SourceView Similar (3)
Ruling Process Control. Enhabit hereby agrees that Encompass shall have sole and exclusive control over the process of obtaining any private letter ruling (or other ruling) regarding any Separation Transaction, and that only Encompass shall be permitted to apply for such a private letter ruling (or other ruling). In connection with obtaining a private letter ruling pursuant to Section 7.04(b), Encompass shall (i) keep Enhabit informed in a timely manner of all material actions taken or proposed to be taken by Encompass in connection therewith; (ii) (A) reasonably in advance of the submission of any related private letter ruling documents, provide Enhabit with a draft copy thereof, (B) reasonably consider Enhabit’s comments on such draft copy, and (C) provide Enhabit with a final copy of such documents; and (iii) provide Enhabit with notice reasonably in advance of, and Enhabit shall have the right to attend, any formally scheduled meetings with the IRS (or other applicable Tax Authority) (subject to the approval of the IRS (or other applicable Tax Authority)) that relate to such private letter ruling request. Neither Enhabit nor any of its directly or indirectly controlled Affiliates shall seek any guidance from the IRS or any other Tax Authority (whether written, oral or otherwise) at any time concerning any Separation Transaction (including the impact of any subsequent transaction thereon).
View SourceView Similar (3)
Ruling Process Control. BGC Partners shall have sole and exclusive control over the process of obtaining any Distribution Ruling, and only BGC Partners shall be permitted to apply for a Distribution Ruling. In connection with obtaining a Distribution Ruling pursuant to Section 7.04(b), (A) BGC Partners shall keep Newmark informed in a timely manner of all material actions taken or proposed to be taken by BGC Partners in connection therewith; (B) BGC Partners shall (1) reasonably in advance of the submission of any related private letter ruling documents provide Newmark with a draft copy thereof, (2) reasonably consider Newmark’s comments on such draft copy, and (3) provide Newmark with a final copy; and (C) BGC Partners shall provide Newmark with notice reasonably in advance of, and Newmark shall have the right to attend, any formally scheduled meetings with the IRS or other applicable Tax Authority (subject to the approval of the IRS or such Tax Authority) that relate to such Distribution Ruling. Neither Newmark nor any of its Affiliates shall seek any guidance from the IRS or any other Tax Authority (whether written, verbal or otherwise) at any time concerning the Contribution and the Distribution, the Partnership Divisions or any of the other Separation Transactions (including the impact of any transaction on any of the foregoing).
View Source

Related to Ruling Process Control

  • Access Control Supplier will maintain an appropriate access control policy that is designed to restrict access to Accenture Data and Supplier assets to authorized Personnel. Supplier will require that all accounts have complex passwords that contain letters, numbers, and special characters, be changed at least every 90 days, and have a minimum length of 8 characters.

  • Signaling protocol 4.1.3.1 SS7 Signaling is AT&T-21STATE’s preferred method for signaling. Where MF signaling is currently used, the Parties agree to use their best efforts to convert to SS7. If SS7 services are provided by AT&T-21STATE, they will be provided in accordance with the provisions of the applicable access tariffs. 4.1.3.2 Where MF signaling is currently used, the Parties agree to interconnect their networks using MF or dual tone MF (DTMF) signaling, subject to availability at the End Office Switch or Tandem Switch at which Interconnection occurs. The Parties acknowledge that the use of MF signaling may not be optimal. AT&T-21STATE will not be responsible for correcting any undesirable characteristics, service problems or performance problems that are associated with MF/SS7 inter-working or the signaling protocol required for Interconnection with CLEC employing MF signaling.

  • System Access Control Data processing systems used to provide the Cloud Service must be prevented from being used without authorization.

  • BILLING PROCEDURE a. The Contractor shall submit, not more than semi-monthly, properly completed A-19 vouchers (the "voucher") to one of the following: The Department of Children, Youth, and Families Attn: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ PO Box 40970 Olympia WA 98504-0970 Or, email a scan of an original, signed A-19 voucher directly to the DCYF Contract Manager at ▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇ b. Payment to the Contractor for approved and completed work shall be made by warrant or Electronic Funds Transfer by DCYF and considered timely if made within 30 days of receipt of a properly completed voucher. Payment shall be sent to the address designated by the Contractor and set forth in this Contract. c. Each voucher must clearly reference the DCYF Contract Number and the Contractor's Statewide Payee Registration number assigned by the Office of Financial Management (OFM). d. Properly completed vouchers and attachments completed by the Contractor must contain the information described in Exhibit A under the Section titled "Compensation and Voucher Payment".

  • Access Controls a. Authorized Access - DST shall have controls that are designed to maintain the logical separation such that access to systems hosting Fund Data and/or being used to provide services to Fund will uniquely identify each individual requiring access, grant access only to authorized personnel based on the principle of least privileges, and prevent unauthorized access to Fund Data. b. User Access - DST shall have a process to promptly disable access to Fund Data by any DST personnel who no longer requires such access. DST will also promptly remove access of Fund personnel upon receipt of notification from Fund.