Scope of Revised HHRA Sample Clauses

Scope of Revised HHRA. Groundwater is the primary contaminated medium of concern at the Site. Exposure to chemicals in the groundwater is primarily the result of transport of VOCs from the groundwater to the ground surface. Once at the surface, these VOCs enter the outdoor atmosphere or infiltrate the indoor building environment. The risks resulting from potential exposure to VOC vapors were calculated using groundwater quality data and air quality data (Mactec, 2003b). The results of these calculations are summarized below in Section 4.2.2. Although soil containing metals, PAHs, SVOCs, PCBs, and VOCs have been detected, most of the source areas and surrounding soil have been removed. However, a residual soil data set (i.e., representing post remediation conditions following the removal of contamination sources) was not available for the Revised HHRA. Because a soil data set representing current chemical concentrations in soil at the Site could not be compiled, quantitative risks could not be estimated. Instead, soil target concentration levels were developed, as discussed in Section 4.3. The Revised HHRA evaluated potential health risks to (a) construction workers; (b) indoor workers, such as researchers, teachers, office personnel; and (c) adult and child residents in housing provided for students or employees and their families. For the adult and child residents, exposures were assessed in two ways, i.e., assuming a typical 5- to 10-year residence at the Site, and assuming a 30-year residence at the Site, which is consistent with default exposure parameters in U.S. EPA risk assessment guidance. To provide a range of risk estimates, two types of exposure scenarios were used in the Revised HHRA, i.e., a reasonable maximum exposure (“RME”) and a central tendency exposure (“CTE”). The RME, as defined by U.S. EPA (1989b), is the “highest exposure that is reasonably expected to occur” and is estimated using a combination of average and upper-bound values of human exposure parameters. The CTE provides an estimate for exposure at a site by the use of average or site-related exposure parameters (Mactec, 2003b). The following chemicals were selected as COPCs for groundwater for the Site: 1,1-DCA; 1,1-DCE; 1,2-dichloroethane (“1,2-DCA”); trans-1,2-DCE; benzene, chloroform; cis-1,2-DCE; methylene chloride; PCE; TCE; 1,4-dioxane; 1,1,1-TCA, and vinyl chloride. Analytical data for soil at NRP were not available for the Revised HHRA (see above).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Scope of Revised HHRA

  • Scope of Release The provisions of this Release shall be deemed to obligate, extend to, and inure to the benefit of the parties; the Company’s parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, successors, predecessors, assigns, directors, officers, and employees; and each party’s insurers, transferees, grantees, legatees, agents, personal representatives and heirs, including those who may assume any and all of the above-described capacities subsequent to the execution and Effective Date of this Release.

  • Termination of Review If a Review is in process and the Notes will be paid in full on the next Payment Date, the Servicer will notify the Asset Representations Reviewer and the Indenture Trustee no less than ten days before that Payment Date. On receipt of notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will terminate the Review immediately and will not be obligated to deliver a Review Report.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Claims and Review Procedure In the event that any claim for benefits that must initially be submitted in writing to the Board of Directors, is denied (in whole or in part) hereunder, the claimant shall receive from First Charter a notice of denial in writing within 60 days, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for denial, with specific reference to pertinent provisions of this Supplemental Agreement. Any disagreements about such interpretations and construction shall be submitted to an arbitrator subject to the rules and procedures established by the American Arbitration Association. The arbitrator shall be acceptable to both First Charter and the Executive (or Beneficiary); if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator, the disagreement shall be heard by a panel of three arbitrators, with each party to appoint one arbitrator and the third to be chosen by the other two. No member of the Board of Directors shall be liable to any person for any action taken under Article VIII except those actions undertaken with lack of good faith.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria On or before March 15th of each calendar year, beginning with March 15, 2008, the Servicer shall deliver to the Seller, the Trustee, the Master Servicer, the NIMS Insurer and the Depositor a report regarding its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria identified in Exhibit H attached hereto, as of and for the fiscal year of the Trust (which, unless otherwise identified to the Servicer in writing, shall be the calendar year) for the year prior to the year of delivery of the report, with respect to asset-backed security transactions taken as a whole that are backed by the same asset type backing such asset-backed securities. Each such report shall include (a) a statement of the party’s responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to such party, (b) a statement that such party used the criteria identified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB (§ 229.1122(d)) to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, (c) disclosure of any material instance of noncompliance identified by such party, and (d) a statement that a registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on such party’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, which report shall be delivered by the Servicer as provided in Section 5.02.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Subject Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Subject Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Subject Receivable is paid in full by or on behalf of the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer by the Sponsor or the Servicer in accordance with the Transaction Documents. On receipt of notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of such Receivables and the Asset Review of such Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for the Receivables and the related reason.

  • Scope of Service See Appendix 1 for the scope of relevant technology service provided by Party B to Party A.

  • Joint Remediation Committee If the Sellers (acting reasonably) determine that the Purchasers have committed a Major Default, then, at the election of the Sellers, within three (3) Business Days of the Sellers providing the Purchasers written notice of such determination, the Sellers and the Purchasers shall establish a joint remediation committee of designated executives from the Sellers and the Purchasers (“Joint Remediation Committee”) consisting of three (3) members of each of the Sellers and the Purchasers. The Joint Remediation Committee shall be responsible for overseeing the development of a mutually agreeable plan in accordance with subsection 3 below to either (i) remediate any breaches giving rise to the Major Default to the extent such breaches can be remediated and/or (ii) prevent similar breaches from recurring in the future (clauses (i) and (ii), a “Corrective Action Plan”). Each member of the Joint Remediation Committee shall have sufficient authority on the part of his or her respective party to make decisions relating to matters reviewed by the Joint Remediation Committee, and shall be approved by the other party (such approval not to be unreasonably delayed, conditioned or withheld). The Joint Remediation Committee shall have access to Purchaser Personnel that are primarily responsible for the area of the business relationship (such as information technology, data security or regulatory) where the breaches giving rise to the Major Default arise (such Purchaser Personnel, collectively, the “Subject Matter Experts”). The Sellers and the Purchasers shall cause their respective members on the Joint Remediation Committee to, and the Purchasers shall cause the Subject Matter Experts to, act in good faith in connection with the development of the Corrective Action Plan.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.