Second Delphi results: clarification of SbD, exposure and toxicology Sample Clauses

Second Delphi results: clarification of SbD, exposure and toxicology. In this section the graphics and selected analyses of the data and comments for each of the questions are presented. Similar to the first round, the full printout of SciPinion graphics for the responses are provided in Appendix 8. In the second round of the Delphi web forum participants made use of the open text fields following the questions to provide detail on their response choices. As a result of this there were over 40 comments provided for each question, with some questions having up to 80 comments. These comments were collated to allow for a qualitative analysis to identify the main opinions and perceptions of participants. A summary of this narrative has been inserted following each of the graphics below. Do you agree that safe by design practices are already in place for medical, food additive, or food packaging uses of nanomaterials? As can be seen in Figure 20 the majority of participants have identified that for food packaging and medical applications SbD is in place, but requires more attention. The response for food additives was somewhat more of a split between those indicating that SbD is in place and not in place. Figure 20 Do you agree that safe by design practices are already in place for medical, food additive, or food packaging uses of nanomaterials? The comments provided in the free text field alongside this question support this view, as it was clear there is uncertainty about the extent to which SbD is in place for medical, food additive and food packaging. One of the main reasons reported for this uncertainty was the lack of standardisation of the methods and practices. This lack of availability of standardised methods was reported as a contributing factor for the implementation of practices not being thorough enough when being applied. Participants suggested that this will result in inconsistencies. These inconsistencies were identified as occurring along the life cycle in how and what practices are applied, but also inconsistencies in how these are applied within and between countries. Participants suggested that there is a need for more knowledge in order to increase certainty and consistency in SbD practices. Along with this knowledge, it was identified that there is a need for a system or environment in which this knowledge can be shared and discussed by different stakeholders. Knowledge gaps in relation to food packaging were a specific concern identified by participants. The knowledge gaps identified by participants focusse...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Second Delphi results: clarification of SbD, exposure and toxicology

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

  • LIMITATIONS ON REVERSE ENGINEERING, DECOMPILATION AND DISASSEMBLY You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation.

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum.

  • Drug Test Results 1. All records pertaining to department-required drug tests shall remain confidential, and shall not be provided to other employers or agencies without the written permission of the person whose records are sought. However, medical, administrative, and immediate supervisory personnel may have access to relevant portions of the records as necessary to insure the acceptable performance of the officer's job duties.

  • Certification of Meeting or Exceeding Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy Minimum Standards A. Grantee certifies that it has adopted and enforces a Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy that meets or exceeds all of the following minimum standards of:

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • Supplemental JBoss Software Conditions Software Access and Software Maintenance for Supplemental JBoss Software is intended and available for Development Purposes only and for up to 25 users for each 16 Core Band Subscription of Red Hat JBoss Middleware Software that you purchased. If you deploy or use the Supplemental JBoss Software for Production Purposes or for more than 25 users, you agree to purchase the appropriate Software Subscriptions for each Unit that you deploy or use. Red Hat’s Open Source Assurance Program applies only to the Red Hat JBoss Middleware Software Subscription that you purchased (such as Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform in the example above) and does not apply to Supplemental JBoss Software. JBoss xPaaS Subscriptions (defined below) are not considered Supplemental JBoss Software. Each installation and use of JBoss xPaaS Subscriptions Software for either Development Purposes or Production Purposes is a Unit and requires a paid Software Subscription.

  • BID TABULATION AND RESULTS Bid tabulations shall be available thirty (30) days after opening on the Orange County website at: xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xxx/orangebids/bidresults/results.asp or upon notice of intended action, whichever is sooner.

  • Musculoskeletal Injury Prevention and Control (a) The Hospital in consultation with the Joint Health and Safety Committee (JHSC) shall develop, establish and put into effect, musculoskeletal prevention and control measures, procedures, practices and training for the health and safety of employees.

  • Limited Waiver of Sovereign Immunity Ex Contractu Contractor acknowledges and agrees that Owner is an agency or instrumentality of the State of Georgia, and as such is entitled to the protection of sovereign immunity. As set forth in Article I, Section II, Paragraph IX of the 1983 Georgia Constitution, sovereign immunity is waived “as to any action ex contractu for the breach of any written contract.” Contractor specifically acknowledges the constitutional and contractual requirements that written changes, modifications, and waivers to this Contract must be specifically executed by the Owner as set forth in the Contract Documents. Accordingly, Contractor specifically acknowledges the constitutional prohibitions against claims against Owner based solely upon oral statement, course of conduct, customs of the trade, quasi-contract, quantum meruit, or O.C.G.A § 13-4-4 (mutual departure from contract terms).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.