Second Review Sample Clauses

Second Review. If, after review of leases within the Comparable Buildings meeting the Size Threshold and executed during the Comparison Period, there are fewer than six (6) Qualifying Comparable Leases (as defined utilizing the Comparable Lease Criteria) identified following the Initial Review, then Lessor and Lessee shall make adjustments to the Comparison Period (as provided below) in an attempt to identify sufficient additional Comparable Leases to be added to the Qualifying Comparable Leases identified during the Initial Review to reach six (6) Qualifying Comparable Leases (this second review conducted by Lessee and Lessor shall be referred to herein as the “Second Review” and each Comparable Lease identified during this Second Review shall constitute a Qualifying Comparable Lease notwithstanding the fact that the Comparison Period has been so adjusted). During the Second Review, the Comparison Period shall be expanded in two (2) month increments, for each increment adding one (1) month at each end of the Comparison Period, until there are sufficient additional Comparable Leases identified during such Second Review when added to the Qualifying Comparable Leases identified during the Initial Review so that there are at least six (6) Qualifying Comparable Leases; provided, however, in no event shall the Comparison Period be expanded to exceed twenty-four (24) months in length. Third Review: If the Comparison Period has been expanded to twenty-four (24) months and there continue to be fewer than six (6) Qualifying Comparable Leases identified following the Second Review, then Lessor and Lessee shall make adjustments to the Size Threshold (as provided below) in an attempt to identify sufficient additional Comparable Leases to be added to the Qualifying Comparable Leases identified during the Initial Review and the Second Review to reach six (6) Qualifying Comparable Leases (this third review conducted by Lessee and Lessor shall be referred to herein as the “Third Review” and each Comparable Lease identified during this Third Review shall constitute a Qualifying Comparable Lease notwithstanding the fact that the Size Threshold is adjusted as provided herein). During the Third Review, the original twelve (12) month Comparison Period shall be reinstated and the Size Threshold shall be reduced in increments of one thousand (1,000) rentable square feet until there are sufficient additional Comparable Leases identified during such Third Review when added to the Qualifying Comp...
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Second Review. A formal joint second review of progress by PACT and BECTU in the implementation of this Agreement shall be held two (2) years from the Implementation Date. The review shall have the power to affect such changes as are mutually agreed.
Sample 1Sample 2
Second Review. If the review reveals that the Employee has not been scheduled in a manner consistent with the original job posting, due to mitigating circumstances (such as vacation, LOA or sick leave replacement), then a second review will take place in another three (3) months and, based on the second review, the Employee’s schedule will either remain a variable position, due to actually working a variable schedule, or convert to a schedule with a set start and end time, due to the absence of any variable scheduling or mitigating circumstances.
Sample 1Sample 2
Second Review. The second review will take place no later than May 15th of the second year of the probationary appointment.
Sample 1
Second Review. The second review will take place no later than sixty (60) days before the second anniversary of appointment.
Sample 1
Second Review. If, after review of leases within the Comparable Buildings meeting the Size Threshold and executed during the Comparison Period, there are fewer than six (6) Qualifying Comparable Leases (as defined utilizing the Comparable Lease Criteria) identified following the Initial Review, then Lessor and Lessee shall make adjustments to the Comparison Period (as provided below) in an attempt to identify sufficient additional Comparable Leases to be added to the Qualifying Comparable Leases identified during the Initial Review to reach six (6) Qualifying Comparable Leases (this second review conducted by Lessee and Lessor shall be referred to herein as the “Second Review” and each Comparable Lease identified during this Second Review shall constitute a Qualifying Comparable Lease notwithstanding the fact that the Comparison Period has been so adjusted). During the Second Review, the Comparison Period shall be expanded in two (2) month increments, for each increment adding one (1) month at each end of the Comparison Period, until there are sufficient additional Comparable Leases identified during such Second Review when added to the Qualifying Comparable Leases identified during the Initial Review so that there are at least six (6) Qualifying Comparable Leases; provided, however, in no event shall the Comparison Period be expanded to exceed twenty-four (24) months in length.
Sample 1

Related to Second Review

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Examination and Review A volunteer, upon presenting identification, shall be permitted by appointment to examine and copy his/her complete County volunteer file, MCFRS operating, or medical record. The volunteer shall indicate in writing, to be placed in his/her file, that he/she has examined the same. The custodian of medical records may determine, consistent with State law, that certain medical information will only be released to the physician or attorney of the volunteer upon receipt of a signed release from the volunteer. Medical records will be maintained in accordance with Section Three of this Article. The County may retain and store records in various formats, including as electronically imaged documents. Confidentiality must be maintained and assured in all formats. Unless otherwise expressly set forth in Sections One through Six, no other documents or information may be placed or maintained in the County volunteer file, MCFRS operating record, or medical file.

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Counsel Review Executive acknowledges that he has had the opportunity to consult with independent counsel with respect to the negotiation, preparation, and execution of this Agreement.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!