Selection Priorities Sample Clauses

Selection Priorities. Enroll up to 16 children meeting income guidelines in Head Start Support established enrollment process Enroll up to 24 Universal Pre-K students. Provide voluntary preschool services to children not enrolled in Head Start who are 4-years-old by September 15. Provide 3 year old preschool services as enrollment allows Class size not to exceed 20 students Class size not to exceed 20 students
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Selection Priorities. The consideration of applicants for selection shall be based on the following priorities:
Selection Priorities. If more than one qualified nonprofit organization or public body submits an offer to pur- chase the project at the same time, pri- ority will be given to local nonprofit organizations and public bodies over regional and national nonprofit organi- zations or public bodies. When select- ing between offers equally meeting all other criteria, the borrower will first consider the success of the nonprofit organization’s or public body’s pre- vious experience in developing and maintaining subsidized housing, with § 3560.660 preference given to the most success- ful. If the offers continue to be equal, the borrower will then consider the number of years experience that the nonprofit organization or public body has had in developing and maintaining subsidized housing, with preference given to the greater number of years.
Selection Priorities. Flyers and information regarding federal income guidelines for both programs and service delivery area information will be available at recruitment events, program offices, schools and community agencies within the service area. Communication and collaboration with the school district’s Homeless Liaison and Head Start staff will be ongoing and as needed for the purpose of providing quality services to the homeless community.
Selection Priorities. In selecting eligi- ble members of the armed forces to receive as- sistance under the Program, the Secretary
Selection Priorities. The process to evaluate and select the joint experiments will consider the following points: • Scientific merit • Quality of the project • Innovation of the project • Detailed definition of Test Plan • Competence of the applicants • Cooperation between several research groups from European states • Compatibility with EERA Wind SRA • Support SET-Plan priorities • Sharing of national infrastructures • Stimulation of cooperation and alignment of nationally financed activities • Creating open access dataset of value for the European wind energy research and industrial sector One of the main priorities is that the proposed experiment should xxxxxx cooperation between several research groups from several European states, and contribute to the alignment and support of nationally financed projects. Priority will be given to the joint experiments that will have direct impact in national research activities.
Selection Priorities. 1. Total funds available for leave may not allow the Faculty Leave Committee to recommend approval of all the leave applications that otherwise would be approved. In such a situation the Committee recommends approval of applications first on the basis of the quality of the application and on the applicant’s research record. The Committee may also rank applications according to the following priorities:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Selection Priorities

  • Selection Procedures In selecting the Loan Assets to be Pledged pursuant to this Agreement, no selection procedures were employed which are intended to be adverse to the interests of the Lenders.

  • Selection Procedure 10.2.4.1 Internal applicants shall be defined as all applicants with seniority in accordance with Article 12.5.

  • Administrator Allowances and Conditions of Practice 4.1. Creation of New Designations/Positions

  • Application Procedures a) An employee applies for a listing on the system-wide registry through the employee’s Human Resources Department by completing the form in Appendix B.

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Election Procedures Each holder of record of shares of Company Common Stock (“Holder”) shall have the right, subject to the limitations set forth in this Article II, to submit an election in accordance with the following procedures:

  • Administrative Procedures Administrative procedures with respect to the sale of Notes shall be agreed upon from time to time by the Agents and the Company (the "Procedures"). The Agents and the Company agree to perform the respective duties and obligations specifically provided to be performed by them in the Procedures.

  • Selections In the event that any selection or determination is to be made by Grantee hereunder and at the time of such selection or determination there is more than one Grantee, such selection shall be made by a majority in interest of such Grantees.

  • Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this Agreement against City unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with City and acted upon by City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may be amended, the provisions of which, including such policies and procedures used by City in the implementation of same, are incorporated herein by this reference. Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!