Selection Review Sample Clauses

Selection Review. Employees bypassed for selection more senior to the employee selected shall be informed, in writing, of the reason(s) they were not selected by the person making the selection. They may appeal the determination to the Department of Human Resources at Step 3 of the grievance procedure for a determination as to the adequacy of the reason(s) for the bypassing. Said appeal must be filed within three (3) work days of notification of non-selection. Appointment to the position shall not occur until a determination by the Department of Human Resources has been made. For promotions to Local 2058 bargaining unit positions, the determination at the Department of Human Resources level shall be final and may not be advanced beyond Step 3. For promotions to Local 7 positions, appeal may proceed through the grievance procedure. If the appointment is overturned, the original appointee shall be reinstated to that former position with no loss of seniority.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Selection Review. Where a dispute arises out of the selection of an apprentice that cannot be resolved at the plant level, the matter will be discussed by Management and the Local Union.
Selection Review. Should an employee feel that preference has not been given under the terms of this Article, the employee or the Job Xxxxxxx on their behalf will raise the matter in writing to the Manager, Human Resources within seven (7) calendar days of the date the employee received written notification of selection under 7.01 (g). Within fifteen (15) calendar days of receipt of such referral, the Manager, Human Resources will review the selection and reply to the employee in writing.

Related to Selection Review

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!