Common use of Staff Displacements due to Store Closings Clause in Contracts

Staff Displacements due to Store Closings. (1) The following procedure will apply for anyone af- fected by a displacement: – (2) If a displacement is necessary as a result of a store closing, the employee affected shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in his classification, in his munici- pality, or should he so elect, his seniority division, provided he has greater seniority in such classification. (a) In the event there is no one junior to them in their classification, or they elect not to displace someone junior to them in their classification, they shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in the next lower rated classification, that they have sufficient ability and qualifications to perform, in their municipality or, should they so elect, their seniority division. It is understood that employees in such posted positions under this procedure shall be bumped only once during a specific close-out. (b) Notwithstanding (3) (a) if the affected employ- ee is in a named position, one of the following may apply: (i) If the employee was named from a non posted position or hired from outside the bargaining unit, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in a non posted position only if they possess greater seniority and have the ability and qualifications to perform the available work. (ii) If the employee previously held a posted position within Loblaws or Supercentre, they will have the right to displace the most recently appointed employee in their former clas- sification, in their municipality, or should they so elect, their seniority division. It is also understood that an employee shall not have the right to displace the most recently appointed em- ployee who is in the classification in question, on the same closing, as a result of being displaced under this procedure. Where there is no municipal bump, the municipal bump will be replaced with a “regional bump”. For clarity an employee is deemed to not have a municipal bump when there is only one store within the municipality where the employee is being affected. The regions would be defined as follows: Toronto Division: a) Xxxxxx to Hwy 427 and North to Collingwood b) East side of Hwy 427 to Hwy 404, North to Yonge and Xxxxx Xxxxx

Staff Displacements due to Store Closings. (1) The following procedure will apply for anyone af- fected affected by a displacement: –- Note: For clarity reference to "the most recently named employee" refers to one position, that being the junior most position in the classification, unless otherwise noted. (2a) If a displacement is necessary as a result of a store closing, the employee affected shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in his classification, in his munici- palitymunicipality, or should he so elect, his seniority division, provided he has greater seniority in such classification. (b) Notwithstanding (2)(a), if the affected employee is in a named position at Supercentre as Floral Manager, Customer Service Manager or Non- Food Department Manager, then one of the following may apply: (i) If the employee held a posted position in Loblaws in the classification, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in their classification, in their municipality, or should they so elect, in their seniority division, provided they have greater seniority in such classification. (ii) If the employee never held a posted position in Loblaws in the classification, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in Supercentre only in their classification, in their municipality or should they so elect, their seniority division, provided they have greater seniority in such classification. (a) In the event there is no one junior to them in their classification, or they elect not to displace someone junior to them in their classification, they shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in the next lower rated classification, that they have sufficient ability and qualifications to perform, in their municipality or, should they so elect, their seniority division. It is understood that employees in such posted positions under this procedure shall be bumped only once during a specific close-out. (b) Notwithstanding (3) (a3)a) if the affected employ- ee employee is in a named position, one of the following may apply: (i) If the employee was named from a non posted position or hired from outside the bargaining unit, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in a non posted position only if they possess greater seniority and have the ability and qualifications to perform the available work. (ii) If the employee previously held a posted position within Loblaws or Supercentre, they will have the right to displace the most recently appointed employee in their former clas- sificationclassification, in their municipality, or should they so elect, their seniority division. It is also understood that an employee shall not have the right to displace the most recently appointed em- ployee employee who is in the classification in question, on the same closing, as a result of being displaced under this procedure. Where there . (4) In the event that an employee accepts a lower rated position, their seniority in that lower rated position shall include not only the length of service spent in that position, but also the length of service that they accumulated in the higher rated position which they formerly occupied. (5) It is no municipal bumpunderstood that when a displacement occurs as a result of a store closing, the municipal bump will be replaced employee affected shall exercise their seniority rights as set out in this paragraph (c) in accordance with a “regional bump”. For clarity an employee is deemed to not have a municipal bump when there is only one store within the municipality where the employee is being affected. The regions would be defined as followsfollowing sequence of job classifications: Toronto Division:Grocery-Produce Department Meat Department a(1) Grocery Manager (1) Meat Manager (2) Produce Manager (2) Assistant Meat Manager (3) Customer Service Manager (3) Meat Cutter (4) Bookkeeper (4) Meat Clerk (5) Backup Bookkeeper (6) Receiver (Days) Pharmacy Department (7) Receiver (Nights) (1) Pharmacist-Assistant (8) Grocery-Produce Clerk (9) Cashier, Service Clerk (10) Xxxxxx to Hwy 427 and North to Collingwood bBakery Department Service Department (1) East side of Hwy 427 to Hwy 404, North to Yonge and Xxxxx XxxxxBakery Manager

Staff Displacements due to Store Closings. (1) The following procedure will apply for anyone af- fected affected by a displacement: –Note: For clarity reference to "the most recently named employee" refers to one position, that being the junior most position in the classification, unless otherwise noted. (2a) If a displacement is necessary as a result of a store closing, the employee affected shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in his classification, in his munici- palitymunicipality, or should he so elect, his seniority division, provided he has greater seniority in such classification. (b) Notwithstanding (2)(a), if the affected employee is in a named position at Supercentre as Floral Manager, Customer Service Manager or Non-Food Department Manager, then one of the following may apply: (i) If the employee held a posted position in Loblaws in the classification, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in their classification, in their municipality, or should they so elect, in their seniority division, provided they have greater seniority in such classification. (ii) If the employee never held a posted position in Loblaws in the classification, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in Supercentre only in their classification, in their municipality or should they so elect, their seniority division, provided they have greater seniority in such classification. (a) In the event there is no one junior to them in their classification, or they elect not to displace someone junior to them in their classification, they shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in the next lower rated classification, that they have sufficient ability and qualifications to perform, in their municipality or, should they so elect, their seniority division. It is understood that employees in such posted positions under this procedure shall be bumped only once during a specific close-outcloseout. (b) Notwithstanding (3) (a3)(a) if the affected employ- ee employee is in a named position, one of the following may apply: (i) If the employee was named from a non non-posted position or hired from outside the bargaining unit, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in a non non-posted position only if they possess greater seniority and have the ability and qualifications to perform the available work. (ii) If the employee previously held a posted position within Loblaws or Supercentre, they will have the right to displace the most recently appointed employee in their former clas- sificationclassification, in their municipality, or should they so elect, their seniority division. It is also understood that an employee shall not have the right to displace the most recently appointed em- ployee employee who is in the classification in question, on the same closing, as a result of being displaced under this procedure. Where there is no municipal bump, the municipal bump will be replaced with a “regional bump”. For clarity an employee is deemed to not have a municipal bump when there is only one store within the municipality where the employee is being affected. The regions would be defined as follows: Toronto Division: a) Xxxxxx Milton to Hwy 427 and North to Collingwood b) East side of Hwy 427 to Hwy 404, North to Yonge and Xxxxx Xxxxx

Staff Displacements due to Store Closings. (1) The following procedure will apply for anyone af- fected by a displacement: – (2) If a displacement is necessary as a result of a store closing, the employee affected shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in his classification, in his munici- pality, or should he so elect, his seniority division, provided he has greater seniority in such classification. (a) In the event there is no one junior to them in their classification, or they elect not to displace someone junior to them in their classification, they shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in the next lower rated classification, that they have sufficient ability and qualifications to perform, in their municipality or, should they so elect, their seniority division. It is understood that employees in such posted positions under this procedure shall be bumped only once during a specific close-out. (b) Notwithstanding (3) (a3)(a) if the affected employ- ee is in a named position, one of the following may apply: (i) If the employee was named from a non posted position or hired from outside the bargaining unit, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in a non posted position only if they possess greater seniority and have the ability and qualifications to perform the available work. (ii) If the employee previously held a posted position within Loblaws or Supercentre, they will have the right to displace the most recently appointed employee in their former clas- sification, in their municipality, or should they so elect, their seniority division. It is also understood that an employee shall not have the right to displace the most recently appointed em- ployee who is in the classification in question, on the same closing, as a result of being displaced under this procedure. Where there is no municipal bump, the municipal bump will be replaced with a “regional bump”. For clarity an employee is deemed to not have a municipal bump when there is only one store within the municipality where the employee is being affected. The regions would be defined as follows: Toronto Division: a) Xxxxxx to Hwy 427 and North to Collingwood b) East side of Hwy 427 to Hwy 404, North to Yonge and Xxxxx Xxxxx

Staff Displacements due to Store Closings. (1) The following procedure will apply for anyone af- fected affected by a displacement: –- Note: For clarity reference to "the most recently named employee" refers to one position, that being the junior most position in the classification, unless otherwise noted. (2a) If a displacement is necessary as a result of a store closing, the employee affected shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in his classification, in his munici- palitymunicipality, or should he so elect, his seniority division, provided he has greater seniority in such classification. (b) Notwithstanding (2)(a), if the affected employee is in a named position at Supercentre as Floral Manager, Customer Service Manager or Non-Food Department Manager, then one of the following may apply: (i) If the employee held a posted position in Loblaws in the classification, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in their classification, in their municipality, or should they so elect, in their seniority division, provided they have greater seniority in such classification. (ii) If the employee never held a posted position in Loblaws in the classification, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in Supercentre only in their classification, in their municipality or should they so elect, their seniority division, provided they have greater seniority in such classification. (a) In the event there is no one junior to them in their classification, or they elect not to displace someone junior to them in their classification, they shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in the next lower rated classification, that they have sufficient ability and qualifications to perform, in their municipality or, should they so elect, their seniority division. It is understood that employees in such posted positions under this procedure shall be bumped only once during a specific close-outcloseout. (b) Notwithstanding (3) (a3)a) if the affected employ- ee employee is in a named position, one of the following may apply: (i) If the employee was named from a non non-posted position or hired from outside the bargaining unit, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in a non non-posted position only if they possess greater seniority and have the ability and qualifications to perform the available work. (ii) If the employee previously held a posted position within Loblaws or Supercentre, they will have the right to displace the most recently appointed employee in their former clas- sificationclassification, in their municipality, or should they so elect, their seniority division. It is also understood that an employee shall not have the right to displace the most recently appointed em- ployee employee who is in the classification in question, on the same closing, as a result of being displaced under this procedure. Where there . (4) In the event that an employee accepts a lower rated position, their seniority in that lower rated position shall include not only the length of service spent in that position, but also the length of service that they accumulated in the higher rated position which they formerly occupied. (5) It is no municipal bumpunderstood that when a displacement occurs as a result of a store closing, the municipal bump will be replaced employee affected shall exercise their seniority rights as set out in this paragraph (c) in accordance with a “regional bump”. For clarity an employee is deemed to not have a municipal bump when there is only one store within the municipality where the employee is being affected. The regions would be defined as followsfollowing sequence of job classifications: Toronto Division: a) Xxxxxx to Hwy 427 and North to Collingwood b) East side of Hwy 427 to Hwy 404, North to Yonge and Xxxxx XxxxxManager

Staff Displacements due to Store Closings. (1) The following procedure will apply for anyone af- fected affected by a displacement: –- Note: For clarity reference to "the most recently named employee" refers to one position, that being the junior most position in the classification, unless otherwise noted. (2a) If a displacement is necessary as a result of a store closing, the employee affected shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in his classification, in his munici- palitymunicipality, or should he so elect, his seniority division, provided he has greater seniority in such classification. (b) Notwithstanding (2)(a), if the affected employee is in a named position at Supercentre as Floral Manager, Customer Service Manager or Non-Food Department Manager, then one of the following may apply: (i) If the employee held a posted position in Loblaws in the classification, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in their classification, in their municipality, or should they so elect, in their seniority division, provided they have greater seniority in such classification. (ii) If the employee never held a posted position in Loblaws in the classification, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in Supercentre only in their classification, in their municipality or should they so elect, their seniority division, provided they have greater seniority in such classification. (a) In the event there is no one junior to them in their classification, or they elect not to displace someone junior to them in their classification, they shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in the next lower rated classification, that they have sufficient ability and qualifications to perform, in their municipality or, should they so elect, their seniority division. It is understood that employees in such posted positions under this procedure shall be bumped only once during a specific close-outcloseout. (b) Notwithstanding (3) (a3)(a) if the affected employ- ee employee is in a named position, one of the following may apply: (i) If the employee was named from a non non-posted position or hired from outside the bargaining unit, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in a non non-posted position only if they possess greater seniority and have the ability and qualifications to perform the available work. (ii) If the employee previously held a posted position within Loblaws or Supercentre, they will have the right to displace the most recently appointed employee in their former clas- sificationclassification, in their municipality, or should they so elect, their seniority division. It is also understood that an employee shall not have the right to displace the most recently appointed em- ployee employee who is in the classification in question, on the same closing, as a result of being displaced under this procedure. Where there is no municipal bump, the municipal bump will be replaced with a “regional bump”. For clarity an employee is deemed to not have a municipal bump when there is only one store within the municipality where the employee is being affected. The regions would be defined as follows: Toronto Division: a) Xxxxxx to Hwy 427 and North to Collingwood b) East side of Hwy 427 to Hwy 404, North to Yonge and Xxxxx Xxxxx

Staff Displacements due to Store Closings. (1) The following procedure will apply for anyone af- fected affected by a displacement: –Note: For clarity reference to "the most recently named employee" refers to one position, that being the junior most position in the classification, unless otherwise noted. (2a) If a displacement is necessary as a result of a store closing, the employee affected shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in his classification, in his munici- palitymunicipality, or should he so elect, his seniority division, provided he has greater seniority in such classification. (b) Notwithstanding (2)(a), if the affected employee is in a named position at Supercentre as Floral Manager, Customer Service Manager or Non-Food Department Manager, then one of the following may apply: (i) If the employee held a posted position in Loblaws in the classification, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in their classification, in their municipality, or should they so elect, in their seniority division, provided they have greater seniority in such classification. (ii) If the employee never held a posted position in Loblaws in the classification, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in Supercentre only in their classification, in their municipality or should they so elect, their seniority division, provided they have greater seniority in such classification. (a) In the event there is no one junior to them in their classification, or they elect not to displace someone junior to them in their classification, they shall have the right to displace the most recently named employee in the next lower rated classification, that they have sufficient ability and qualifications to perform, in their municipality or, should they so elect, their seniority division. It is understood that employees in such posted positions under this procedure shall be bumped only once during a specific close-outcloseout. (b) Notwithstanding (3) (a3)(a) if the affected employ- ee employee is in a named position, one of the following may apply: (i) If the employee was named from a non non-posted position or hired from outside the bargaining unit, they would have the right to displace the most recently named employee in a non non-posted position only if they possess greater seniority and have the ability and qualifications to perform the available work. (ii) If the employee previously held a posted position within Loblaws or Supercentre, they will have the right to displace the most recently appointed employee in their former clas- sificationclassification, in their municipality, or should they so elect, their seniority division. It is also understood that an employee shall not have the right to displace the most recently appointed em- ployee employee who is in the classification in question, on the same closing, as a result of being displaced under this procedure. Where there is no municipal bump, the municipal bump will be replaced with a “regional bump”. For clarity an employee is deemed to not have a municipal bump when there is only one store within the municipality where the employee is being affected. The regions would be defined as follows: Toronto Division: a) Xxxxxx to Hwy 427 and North to Collingwood b) East side of Hwy 427 to Hwy 404, North to Yonge and Xxxxx Xxxxx