Start validation Sample Clauses

Start validation. The validation is initialized with a HTTP POST call to xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx- xxxxxxxx.xx/xxxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx_xxxx_xxxxx. The parameters to control the routine are algorithm-URI, dataset-URI and prediction-feature. The subject-id is specified as additional header (with –H option): xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxxx.xx/task/1004 curl -X POST -d algorithm_uri="xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxx.xx:8443/ambit2/algorithm/LR" -d dataset_uri="xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxx.xx:8443/ambit2/dataset/R401560" -d prediction_feature="xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxx.xx:8443/ambit2/feature/22190" xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxxx.xx/validation/training_test_split -H "subjectid:AQIC5wM2LY4SfczngIclWu3ztAWK7WKXHfAFK+CI8Rvf5zU=@AAJTSQACMDE=#" The validation service returns the URI of a task object, while running the validation as an asynchronous background job. The result is stored in the task object when the job is finished. Get validation result-URI: 58 See for example: xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx- xxxxxxx.xx:8443/ambit2/algorithm/org.openscience.cdk.qsar.descriptors.molecular.AtomCountDescriptor 59 Documentation for the OpenTox API xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxx/dev/apis/api-1.2 60 The cURL calls (presented in purple boxes) can be copied to and executed with a command-line interface. The return value is marked in green (success) or orange (error) boxes. Task resources are not protected, which is why the following cURL call does not need to include the subject-id: curl xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxxx.xx/task/1004 -H "Accept:application/x- yaml" --- xxxx://xxxx.xxx/dc/elements/1.1/title: Perform training test split validation xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/api/1.1#hasStatus: Completed xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/api/1.1#resultURI: xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx- xxxxxxxx.xx/xxxxxxxxxx/000 xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/api/1.1#percentageCompleted: 100.0 […] Using cURL on the task-URI returns a list of its properties, including the field result-URI that contains the validation-URI. Get validation result: The following cURL call demonstrates that the validation result xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx- xxxxxxxx.xx/xxxxxxxxxx/000 is protected by the A&A routines: curl xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxxx.xx/validation/114 --- !ruby/object:OpenTox::ErrorReport actor: xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxxx.xx/validation/114 errorType: OpenTox::NotAuthorizedError http_code: 401 message: Not authorized […] xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxxx.xx/validation/training_test_split Access is denied, and an error report is re...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Start validation

  • Validation To validate the notice requirements outlined in Section 5.3, the Assuming Institution shall provide the Receiver (i) an Affidavit of Publication to meet the publication requirements outlined in Section 5.3(a) and (ii) the Assuming Institution will prepare an Affidavit of Mailing in a form substantially similar to Exhibit 2.3B after mailing the seven (7) day Notice to Depositors as required under Section 5.3(b).

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Maintenance and Testing 54.5.1. Sprint is only responsible for maintaining the facilities that it owns.

  • Inspection and Testing Each Constructing Entity shall cause inspection and testing of the Interconnection Facilities that it constructs in accordance with the provisions of this section. The Construction Parties acknowledge and agree that inspection and testing of facilities may be undertaken as facilities are completed and need not await completion of all of the facilities that a Constructing Entity is building.

  • Application and Commencement 3.1. After the Client fills in and submits the Account Opening Application Form together with all the required identification documentation required by the Company for its own internal checks, the Company will send him a notice informing him whether he has been accepted as a Client of the Company or not. It is understood that the Company is not to be required (and may be unable under Applicable Regulations) to accept a person as its Client until all documentation it requires has been received by the Company, properly and fully completed by such person and all internal Company checks (including without limitation anti-money laundering checks, appropriateness or suitability tests (as the case may be) have been satisfied. It is further understood that the Company reserves the right to impose additional due diligence requirements to accept Clients residing in certain countries.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • Validation Mechanism To be eligible for articulation, the student must show evidence of their CompTIA A+ certification and it must have been issued within three (3) years prior to their enrollment in the program.

  • Service Commencement 3.1 The Engineer may reuse an existing socket and line routing to fulfil your order; if this occurs your appointment will be cancelled and no engineer will attend site. If you want to force an engineer to attend site, then you are required to tick the box on the order form (up to 2 hours of Time Related Charges may apply in addition to the activation fee):

  • Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work The Contractor will be required (a) to commence the Work under this Contract on the applicable Proceed Order Date, (b) to prosecute the Work with faithfulness and energy (c) to install the various parts of the work with equal steps shown on the Overall Project Schedule and at the same rate (or better) shown on the Overall Project Schedule and (d) to complete the Work within the Contract Time, as adjusted. Commencement of the Work shall mean actual physical work on the Site. Unless otherwise agreed, and subject to Change Orders, Material Completion of the Project must be achieved on or before the date established as the Material Completion and Occupancy Date under the Schedule.

  • Inspections and Testing Each Interconnected Entity shall perform routine inspection and testing of its facilities and equipment in accordance with Good Utility Practice as may be necessary to ensure the continued interconnection of the Customer Facility with the Transmission System in a safe and reliable manner. Each Interconnected Entity shall have the right, upon advance written notice, to request reasonable additional testing of an Interconnected Entity’s facilities for good cause, as may be in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.